Cargando…

Multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses

To interact with machines, from computers to cars, we need to monitor multiple sensory stimuli, and respond to them with specific motor actions. It has been shown that our ability to react to a sensory stimulus is dependent on both the stimulus modality, as well as the spatial compatibility of the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dechaux, A., Haytam-Mahsoub, M., Kitazaki, M., Lagarde, J., Ganesh, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24028-5
_version_ 1784837085949067264
author Dechaux, A.
Haytam-Mahsoub, M.
Kitazaki, M.
Lagarde, J.
Ganesh, G.
author_facet Dechaux, A.
Haytam-Mahsoub, M.
Kitazaki, M.
Lagarde, J.
Ganesh, G.
author_sort Dechaux, A.
collection PubMed
description To interact with machines, from computers to cars, we need to monitor multiple sensory stimuli, and respond to them with specific motor actions. It has been shown that our ability to react to a sensory stimulus is dependent on both the stimulus modality, as well as the spatial compatibility of the stimulus and the required response. However, the compatibility effects have been examined for sensory modalities individually, and rarely for scenarios requiring individuals to choose from multiple actions. Here, we compared response time of participants when they had to choose one of several spatially distinct, but compatible, responses to visual, tactile or simultaneous visual and tactile stimuli. We observed that the presence of both tactile and visual stimuli consistently improved the response time relative to when either stimulus was presented alone. While we did not observe a difference in response times of visual and tactile stimuli, the spatial stimulus localization was observed to be faster for visual stimuli compared to tactile stimuli.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9691706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96917062022-11-26 Multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses Dechaux, A. Haytam-Mahsoub, M. Kitazaki, M. Lagarde, J. Ganesh, G. Sci Rep Article To interact with machines, from computers to cars, we need to monitor multiple sensory stimuli, and respond to them with specific motor actions. It has been shown that our ability to react to a sensory stimulus is dependent on both the stimulus modality, as well as the spatial compatibility of the stimulus and the required response. However, the compatibility effects have been examined for sensory modalities individually, and rarely for scenarios requiring individuals to choose from multiple actions. Here, we compared response time of participants when they had to choose one of several spatially distinct, but compatible, responses to visual, tactile or simultaneous visual and tactile stimuli. We observed that the presence of both tactile and visual stimuli consistently improved the response time relative to when either stimulus was presented alone. While we did not observe a difference in response times of visual and tactile stimuli, the spatial stimulus localization was observed to be faster for visual stimuli compared to tactile stimuli. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9691706/ /pubmed/36424417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24028-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Dechaux, A.
Haytam-Mahsoub, M.
Kitazaki, M.
Lagarde, J.
Ganesh, G.
Multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses
title Multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses
title_full Multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses
title_fullStr Multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses
title_full_unstemmed Multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses
title_short Multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses
title_sort multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24028-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dechauxa multisensoryfeedbackimprovesspatiallycompatiblesensorimotorresponses
AT haytammahsoubm multisensoryfeedbackimprovesspatiallycompatiblesensorimotorresponses
AT kitazakim multisensoryfeedbackimprovesspatiallycompatiblesensorimotorresponses
AT lagardej multisensoryfeedbackimprovesspatiallycompatiblesensorimotorresponses
AT ganeshg multisensoryfeedbackimprovesspatiallycompatiblesensorimotorresponses