Cargando…
Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The multifactorial Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) breast cancer risk prediction model has been recently extended to consider all established breast cancer risk factors. We assessed the clinical validity of the model in a large...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2022-108806 |
_version_ | 1784837113587433472 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Xin Eriksson, Mikael Czene, Kamila Lee, Andrew Leslie, Goska Lush, Michael Wang, Jean Dennis, Joe Dorling, Leila Carvalho, Sara Mavaddat, Nasim Simard, Jacques Schmidt, Marjanka K Easton, Douglas F Hall, Per Antoniou, Antonis C |
author_facet | Yang, Xin Eriksson, Mikael Czene, Kamila Lee, Andrew Leslie, Goska Lush, Michael Wang, Jean Dennis, Joe Dorling, Leila Carvalho, Sara Mavaddat, Nasim Simard, Jacques Schmidt, Marjanka K Easton, Douglas F Hall, Per Antoniou, Antonis C |
author_sort | Yang, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The multifactorial Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) breast cancer risk prediction model has been recently extended to consider all established breast cancer risk factors. We assessed the clinical validity of the model in a large independent prospective cohort. METHODS: We validated BOADICEA (V.6) in the Swedish KARolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA) cohort including 66 415 women of European ancestry (median age 54 years, IQR 45–63; 816 incident breast cancers) without previous cancer diagnosis. We calculated 5-year risks on the basis of questionnaire-based risk factors, pedigree-structured first-degree family history, mammographic density (BI-RADS), a validated breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 313-SNPs, and pathogenic variant status in 8 breast cancer susceptibility genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, RAD51C, RAD51D and BARD1. Calibration was assessed by comparing observed and expected risks in deciles of predicted risk and the calibration slope. The discriminatory ability was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Among the individual model components, the PRS contributed most to breast cancer risk stratification. BOADICEA was well calibrated in predicting the risks for low-risk and high-risk women when all, or subsets of risk factors are included in the risk prediction. Discrimination was maximised when all risk factors are considered (AUC=0.70, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.73; expected-to-observed ratio=0.88, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.04; calibration slope=0.97, 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.99). The full multifactorial model classified 3.6% women as high risk (5-year risk ≥3%) and 11.1% as very low risk (5-year risk <0.33%). CONCLUSION: The multifactorial BOADICEA model provides valid breast cancer risk predictions and a basis for personalised decision-making on disease prevention and screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9691822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96918222022-11-26 Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study Yang, Xin Eriksson, Mikael Czene, Kamila Lee, Andrew Leslie, Goska Lush, Michael Wang, Jean Dennis, Joe Dorling, Leila Carvalho, Sara Mavaddat, Nasim Simard, Jacques Schmidt, Marjanka K Easton, Douglas F Hall, Per Antoniou, Antonis C J Med Genet Cancer Genetics BACKGROUND: The multifactorial Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) breast cancer risk prediction model has been recently extended to consider all established breast cancer risk factors. We assessed the clinical validity of the model in a large independent prospective cohort. METHODS: We validated BOADICEA (V.6) in the Swedish KARolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA) cohort including 66 415 women of European ancestry (median age 54 years, IQR 45–63; 816 incident breast cancers) without previous cancer diagnosis. We calculated 5-year risks on the basis of questionnaire-based risk factors, pedigree-structured first-degree family history, mammographic density (BI-RADS), a validated breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 313-SNPs, and pathogenic variant status in 8 breast cancer susceptibility genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, RAD51C, RAD51D and BARD1. Calibration was assessed by comparing observed and expected risks in deciles of predicted risk and the calibration slope. The discriminatory ability was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Among the individual model components, the PRS contributed most to breast cancer risk stratification. BOADICEA was well calibrated in predicting the risks for low-risk and high-risk women when all, or subsets of risk factors are included in the risk prediction. Discrimination was maximised when all risk factors are considered (AUC=0.70, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.73; expected-to-observed ratio=0.88, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.04; calibration slope=0.97, 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.99). The full multifactorial model classified 3.6% women as high risk (5-year risk ≥3%) and 11.1% as very low risk (5-year risk <0.33%). CONCLUSION: The multifactorial BOADICEA model provides valid breast cancer risk predictions and a basis for personalised decision-making on disease prevention and screening. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9691822/ /pubmed/36162852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2022-108806 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Cancer Genetics Yang, Xin Eriksson, Mikael Czene, Kamila Lee, Andrew Leslie, Goska Lush, Michael Wang, Jean Dennis, Joe Dorling, Leila Carvalho, Sara Mavaddat, Nasim Simard, Jacques Schmidt, Marjanka K Easton, Douglas F Hall, Per Antoniou, Antonis C Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study |
title | Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study |
title_full | Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study |
title_short | Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study |
title_sort | prospective validation of the boadicea multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study |
topic | Cancer Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2022-108806 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangxin prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT erikssonmikael prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT czenekamila prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT leeandrew prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT lesliegoska prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT lushmichael prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT wangjean prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT dennisjoe prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT dorlingleila prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT carvalhosara prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT mavaddatnasim prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT simardjacques prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT schmidtmarjankak prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT eastondouglasf prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT hallper prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy AT antoniouantonisc prospectivevalidationoftheboadiceamultifactorialbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelinalargeprospectivecohortstudy |