Cargando…

Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Exercise-stress testing is recommended in case of uncertainty; however, this approach is time-consuming and costly. Since preserved EF does not represent normal systolic function, we hypothesized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Backhaus, Sören J., Uzun, Harun, Rösel, Simon F., Schulz, Alexander, Lange, Torben, Crawley, Richard J., Evertz, Ruben, Hasenfuß, Gerd, Schuster, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36423376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104334
_version_ 1784837126876037120
author Backhaus, Sören J.
Uzun, Harun
Rösel, Simon F.
Schulz, Alexander
Lange, Torben
Crawley, Richard J.
Evertz, Ruben
Hasenfuß, Gerd
Schuster, Andreas
author_facet Backhaus, Sören J.
Uzun, Harun
Rösel, Simon F.
Schulz, Alexander
Lange, Torben
Crawley, Richard J.
Evertz, Ruben
Hasenfuß, Gerd
Schuster, Andreas
author_sort Backhaus, Sören J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Exercise-stress testing is recommended in case of uncertainty; however, this approach is time-consuming and costly. Since preserved EF does not represent normal systolic function, we hypothesized comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of cardiac hemodynamic forces (HDF) may identify functional abnormalities in HFpEF. METHODS: The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03260621) prospectively recruited 75 patients with exertional dyspnea, preserved EF (≥50%) and signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e’ ≥8) on echocardiography. Patients underwent rest and exercise-stress right heart catheterisation, echocardiography and CMR. The final study cohort consisted of 68 patients (HFpEF n = 34 and non-cardiac dyspnea n = 34 according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)). HDF assessment included left ventricular (LV) longitudinal, systolic peak and impulse, systolic/diastolic transition, E-wave deceleration as well as A-wave acceleration forces. Follow-up after 24 months evaluated cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation (CVH) – only two patients were lost to follow-up. FINDINGS: HDF assessment revealed impairment of LV longitudinal function in patients with HFpEF compared to non-cardiac dyspnoea (15.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.035), attributable to impairment of systolic peak (38.6% vs 51.6%, p = 0.003) and impulse (20.8% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.009) forces as well as late diastolic filling (−3.8% vs −5.4%, p = 0.029). Early diastolic filling was impaired in HFpEF patients identified at rest compared with patients identified during stress only (7.7% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.004). Impaired systolic peak was associated with CVH (HR 0.95, p = 0.016), and was superior to LV global longitudinal strain assessment in prediction of CVH (AUC 0.76 vs. 0.61, p = 0.048). INTERPRETATION: Assessment of HDF indicates impairment of LV systolic ejection force in HFpEF which is associated with cardiovascular events. FUNDING: 10.13039/100010147German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9691873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96918732022-11-26 Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial Backhaus, Sören J. Uzun, Harun Rösel, Simon F. Schulz, Alexander Lange, Torben Crawley, Richard J. Evertz, Ruben Hasenfuß, Gerd Schuster, Andreas eBioMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Exercise-stress testing is recommended in case of uncertainty; however, this approach is time-consuming and costly. Since preserved EF does not represent normal systolic function, we hypothesized comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of cardiac hemodynamic forces (HDF) may identify functional abnormalities in HFpEF. METHODS: The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03260621) prospectively recruited 75 patients with exertional dyspnea, preserved EF (≥50%) and signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e’ ≥8) on echocardiography. Patients underwent rest and exercise-stress right heart catheterisation, echocardiography and CMR. The final study cohort consisted of 68 patients (HFpEF n = 34 and non-cardiac dyspnea n = 34 according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)). HDF assessment included left ventricular (LV) longitudinal, systolic peak and impulse, systolic/diastolic transition, E-wave deceleration as well as A-wave acceleration forces. Follow-up after 24 months evaluated cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation (CVH) – only two patients were lost to follow-up. FINDINGS: HDF assessment revealed impairment of LV longitudinal function in patients with HFpEF compared to non-cardiac dyspnoea (15.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.035), attributable to impairment of systolic peak (38.6% vs 51.6%, p = 0.003) and impulse (20.8% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.009) forces as well as late diastolic filling (−3.8% vs −5.4%, p = 0.029). Early diastolic filling was impaired in HFpEF patients identified at rest compared with patients identified during stress only (7.7% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.004). Impaired systolic peak was associated with CVH (HR 0.95, p = 0.016), and was superior to LV global longitudinal strain assessment in prediction of CVH (AUC 0.76 vs. 0.61, p = 0.048). INTERPRETATION: Assessment of HDF indicates impairment of LV systolic ejection force in HFpEF which is associated with cardiovascular events. FUNDING: 10.13039/100010147German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK). Elsevier 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9691873/ /pubmed/36423376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104334 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Backhaus, Sören J.
Uzun, Harun
Rösel, Simon F.
Schulz, Alexander
Lange, Torben
Crawley, Richard J.
Evertz, Ruben
Hasenfuß, Gerd
Schuster, Andreas
Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial
title Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial
title_full Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial
title_fullStr Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial
title_short Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial
title_sort hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hfpef: a case-control substudy from the hfpef stress trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36423376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104334
work_keys_str_mv AT backhaussorenj hemodynamicforceassessmentbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhfpefacasecontrolsubstudyfromthehfpefstresstrial
AT uzunharun hemodynamicforceassessmentbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhfpefacasecontrolsubstudyfromthehfpefstresstrial
AT roselsimonf hemodynamicforceassessmentbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhfpefacasecontrolsubstudyfromthehfpefstresstrial
AT schulzalexander hemodynamicforceassessmentbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhfpefacasecontrolsubstudyfromthehfpefstresstrial
AT langetorben hemodynamicforceassessmentbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhfpefacasecontrolsubstudyfromthehfpefstresstrial
AT crawleyrichardj hemodynamicforceassessmentbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhfpefacasecontrolsubstudyfromthehfpefstresstrial
AT evertzruben hemodynamicforceassessmentbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhfpefacasecontrolsubstudyfromthehfpefstresstrial
AT hasenfußgerd hemodynamicforceassessmentbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhfpefacasecontrolsubstudyfromthehfpefstresstrial
AT schusterandreas hemodynamicforceassessmentbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhfpefacasecontrolsubstudyfromthehfpefstresstrial