Cargando…

Semi-automatic segmentation of the fetal brain from magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND: Volumetric measurements of fetal brain maturation in the third trimester of pregnancy are key predictors of developmental outcomes. Improved understanding of fetal brain development trajectories may aid in identifying and clinically managing at-risk fetuses. Currently, fetal brain struct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jianan, Nichols, Emily S., Mueller, Megan E., de Vrijer, Barbra, Eagleson, Roy, McKenzie, Charles A., de Ribaupierre, Sandrine, Duerden, Emma G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1027084
_version_ 1784837165643988992
author Wang, Jianan
Nichols, Emily S.
Mueller, Megan E.
de Vrijer, Barbra
Eagleson, Roy
McKenzie, Charles A.
de Ribaupierre, Sandrine
Duerden, Emma G.
author_facet Wang, Jianan
Nichols, Emily S.
Mueller, Megan E.
de Vrijer, Barbra
Eagleson, Roy
McKenzie, Charles A.
de Ribaupierre, Sandrine
Duerden, Emma G.
author_sort Wang, Jianan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Volumetric measurements of fetal brain maturation in the third trimester of pregnancy are key predictors of developmental outcomes. Improved understanding of fetal brain development trajectories may aid in identifying and clinically managing at-risk fetuses. Currently, fetal brain structures in magnetic resonance images (MRI) are often manually segmented, which requires both time and expertise. To facilitate the targeting and measurement of brain structures in the fetus, we compared the results of five segmentation methods applied to fetal brain MRI data to gold-standard manual tracings. METHODS: Adult women with singleton pregnancies (n = 21), of whom five were scanned twice, approximately 3 weeks apart, were recruited [26 total datasets, median gestational age (GA) = 34.8, IQR = 30.9–36.6]. T2-weighted single-shot fast spin echo images of the fetal brain were acquired on 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners. Images were first combined into a single 3D anatomical volume. Next, a trained tracer manually segmented the thalamus, cerebellum, and total cerebral volumes. The manual segmentations were compared with five automatic methods of segmentation available within Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) and FMRIB’s Linear Image Registration Tool (FLIRT) toolboxes. The manual and automatic labels were compared using Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs). The DSC values were compared using Friedman’s test for repeated measures. RESULTS: Comparing cerebellum and thalamus masks against the manually segmented masks, the median DSC values for ANTs and FLIRT were 0.72 [interquartile range (IQR) = 0.6–0.8] and 0.54 (IQR = 0.4–0.6), respectively. A Friedman’s test indicated that the ANTs registration methods, primarily nonlinear methods, performed better than FLIRT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Deformable registration methods provided the most accurate results relative to manual segmentation. Overall, this semi-automatic subcortical segmentation method provides reliable performance to segment subcortical volumes in fetal MR images. This method reduces the costs of manual segmentation, facilitating the measurement of typical and atypical fetal brain development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9692018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96920182022-11-26 Semi-automatic segmentation of the fetal brain from magnetic resonance imaging Wang, Jianan Nichols, Emily S. Mueller, Megan E. de Vrijer, Barbra Eagleson, Roy McKenzie, Charles A. de Ribaupierre, Sandrine Duerden, Emma G. Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Volumetric measurements of fetal brain maturation in the third trimester of pregnancy are key predictors of developmental outcomes. Improved understanding of fetal brain development trajectories may aid in identifying and clinically managing at-risk fetuses. Currently, fetal brain structures in magnetic resonance images (MRI) are often manually segmented, which requires both time and expertise. To facilitate the targeting and measurement of brain structures in the fetus, we compared the results of five segmentation methods applied to fetal brain MRI data to gold-standard manual tracings. METHODS: Adult women with singleton pregnancies (n = 21), of whom five were scanned twice, approximately 3 weeks apart, were recruited [26 total datasets, median gestational age (GA) = 34.8, IQR = 30.9–36.6]. T2-weighted single-shot fast spin echo images of the fetal brain were acquired on 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners. Images were first combined into a single 3D anatomical volume. Next, a trained tracer manually segmented the thalamus, cerebellum, and total cerebral volumes. The manual segmentations were compared with five automatic methods of segmentation available within Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) and FMRIB’s Linear Image Registration Tool (FLIRT) toolboxes. The manual and automatic labels were compared using Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs). The DSC values were compared using Friedman’s test for repeated measures. RESULTS: Comparing cerebellum and thalamus masks against the manually segmented masks, the median DSC values for ANTs and FLIRT were 0.72 [interquartile range (IQR) = 0.6–0.8] and 0.54 (IQR = 0.4–0.6), respectively. A Friedman’s test indicated that the ANTs registration methods, primarily nonlinear methods, performed better than FLIRT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Deformable registration methods provided the most accurate results relative to manual segmentation. Overall, this semi-automatic subcortical segmentation method provides reliable performance to segment subcortical volumes in fetal MR images. This method reduces the costs of manual segmentation, facilitating the measurement of typical and atypical fetal brain development. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9692018/ /pubmed/36440277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1027084 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Nichols, Mueller, de Vrijer, Eagleson, McKenzie, de Ribaupierre and Duerden. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Wang, Jianan
Nichols, Emily S.
Mueller, Megan E.
de Vrijer, Barbra
Eagleson, Roy
McKenzie, Charles A.
de Ribaupierre, Sandrine
Duerden, Emma G.
Semi-automatic segmentation of the fetal brain from magnetic resonance imaging
title Semi-automatic segmentation of the fetal brain from magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Semi-automatic segmentation of the fetal brain from magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Semi-automatic segmentation of the fetal brain from magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Semi-automatic segmentation of the fetal brain from magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Semi-automatic segmentation of the fetal brain from magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort semi-automatic segmentation of the fetal brain from magnetic resonance imaging
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1027084
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjianan semiautomaticsegmentationofthefetalbrainfrommagneticresonanceimaging
AT nicholsemilys semiautomaticsegmentationofthefetalbrainfrommagneticresonanceimaging
AT muellermegane semiautomaticsegmentationofthefetalbrainfrommagneticresonanceimaging
AT devrijerbarbra semiautomaticsegmentationofthefetalbrainfrommagneticresonanceimaging
AT eaglesonroy semiautomaticsegmentationofthefetalbrainfrommagneticresonanceimaging
AT mckenziecharlesa semiautomaticsegmentationofthefetalbrainfrommagneticresonanceimaging
AT deribaupierresandrine semiautomaticsegmentationofthefetalbrainfrommagneticresonanceimaging
AT duerdenemmag semiautomaticsegmentationofthefetalbrainfrommagneticresonanceimaging