Cargando…

Wound Healing Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Transethosomal Gel, I Optimal Optimization, Histological and In Vivo Evaluation

This study aimed to make a formulation and statistical optimization of transethosomal formulations of rosuvastatin (ROS) to enhance its topical wound healing efficiency. Design-Expert(®) software was used to employ I optimal design. The formulation variables in the study were surfactant concentratio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaki, Randa Mohammed, Seshadri, Vidya Devanathadesikan, Mutayran, Alanoud S., Elsawaf, Lara A., Hamad, Abubaker M., Almurshedi, Alanood S., Yusif, Rehab Mohammad, Said, Mayada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36432712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112521
_version_ 1784837248874708992
author Zaki, Randa Mohammed
Seshadri, Vidya Devanathadesikan
Mutayran, Alanoud S.
Elsawaf, Lara A.
Hamad, Abubaker M.
Almurshedi, Alanood S.
Yusif, Rehab Mohammad
Said, Mayada
author_facet Zaki, Randa Mohammed
Seshadri, Vidya Devanathadesikan
Mutayran, Alanoud S.
Elsawaf, Lara A.
Hamad, Abubaker M.
Almurshedi, Alanood S.
Yusif, Rehab Mohammad
Said, Mayada
author_sort Zaki, Randa Mohammed
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to make a formulation and statistical optimization of transethosomal formulations of rosuvastatin (ROS) to enhance its topical wound healing efficiency. Design-Expert(®) software was used to employ I optimal design. The formulation variables in the study were surfactant concentration (%w/v), ethanol concentration (%w/v) and surfactant type (span 60 or tween 80), while the dependent responses were entrapment efficiency percent (EE%), vesicle size (VS) and zeta potential (ZP). The numerical optimization process employed by the design expert software resulted in an optimum formula composed of 0.819439 (%w/v) span 60, 40 (%w/v) ethanol and 100 mg lecithin with a desirability of 0.745. It showed a predicted EE% value of 66.5517 vs. 277.703 nm and a ZP of −33. When it was prepared and validated, it showed less than a 5% deviation from the predicted values. The optimum formula was subjected to further characterizations, such as DSC, XRD, TEM, in vitro release, the effect of aging and wound healing efficiency. The DSC thermogram made a confirmation of the compatibility of ROS with the ingredients used in the formulation. XRD showed the encapsulation of ROS in the transethosomal vesicles. The TEM image pointed out the spherical nature of the nanovesicles with the absence of aggregation. Additionally, the optimum formula revealed an enhancement of drug release in comparison with the drug suspension. It also showed good stability for one month. Furthermore, it revealed good wound healing efficiency when compared with the standard silver sulphadiazine (1% w/w) ointment or the drug-loaded gel, which could be related to the enhanced penetration of the nanosized vesicles of TESMs into the skin, which enhances the wound healing process. So, it could be regarded as a promising carrier of ROS for the treatment of chronic wounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9692372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96923722022-11-26 Wound Healing Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Transethosomal Gel, I Optimal Optimization, Histological and In Vivo Evaluation Zaki, Randa Mohammed Seshadri, Vidya Devanathadesikan Mutayran, Alanoud S. Elsawaf, Lara A. Hamad, Abubaker M. Almurshedi, Alanood S. Yusif, Rehab Mohammad Said, Mayada Pharmaceutics Article This study aimed to make a formulation and statistical optimization of transethosomal formulations of rosuvastatin (ROS) to enhance its topical wound healing efficiency. Design-Expert(®) software was used to employ I optimal design. The formulation variables in the study were surfactant concentration (%w/v), ethanol concentration (%w/v) and surfactant type (span 60 or tween 80), while the dependent responses were entrapment efficiency percent (EE%), vesicle size (VS) and zeta potential (ZP). The numerical optimization process employed by the design expert software resulted in an optimum formula composed of 0.819439 (%w/v) span 60, 40 (%w/v) ethanol and 100 mg lecithin with a desirability of 0.745. It showed a predicted EE% value of 66.5517 vs. 277.703 nm and a ZP of −33. When it was prepared and validated, it showed less than a 5% deviation from the predicted values. The optimum formula was subjected to further characterizations, such as DSC, XRD, TEM, in vitro release, the effect of aging and wound healing efficiency. The DSC thermogram made a confirmation of the compatibility of ROS with the ingredients used in the formulation. XRD showed the encapsulation of ROS in the transethosomal vesicles. The TEM image pointed out the spherical nature of the nanovesicles with the absence of aggregation. Additionally, the optimum formula revealed an enhancement of drug release in comparison with the drug suspension. It also showed good stability for one month. Furthermore, it revealed good wound healing efficiency when compared with the standard silver sulphadiazine (1% w/w) ointment or the drug-loaded gel, which could be related to the enhanced penetration of the nanosized vesicles of TESMs into the skin, which enhances the wound healing process. So, it could be regarded as a promising carrier of ROS for the treatment of chronic wounds. MDPI 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9692372/ /pubmed/36432712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112521 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zaki, Randa Mohammed
Seshadri, Vidya Devanathadesikan
Mutayran, Alanoud S.
Elsawaf, Lara A.
Hamad, Abubaker M.
Almurshedi, Alanood S.
Yusif, Rehab Mohammad
Said, Mayada
Wound Healing Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Transethosomal Gel, I Optimal Optimization, Histological and In Vivo Evaluation
title Wound Healing Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Transethosomal Gel, I Optimal Optimization, Histological and In Vivo Evaluation
title_full Wound Healing Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Transethosomal Gel, I Optimal Optimization, Histological and In Vivo Evaluation
title_fullStr Wound Healing Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Transethosomal Gel, I Optimal Optimization, Histological and In Vivo Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Wound Healing Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Transethosomal Gel, I Optimal Optimization, Histological and In Vivo Evaluation
title_short Wound Healing Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Transethosomal Gel, I Optimal Optimization, Histological and In Vivo Evaluation
title_sort wound healing efficacy of rosuvastatin transethosomal gel, i optimal optimization, histological and in vivo evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36432712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112521
work_keys_str_mv AT zakirandamohammed woundhealingefficacyofrosuvastatintransethosomalgelioptimaloptimizationhistologicalandinvivoevaluation
AT seshadrividyadevanathadesikan woundhealingefficacyofrosuvastatintransethosomalgelioptimaloptimizationhistologicalandinvivoevaluation
AT mutayranalanouds woundhealingefficacyofrosuvastatintransethosomalgelioptimaloptimizationhistologicalandinvivoevaluation
AT elsawaflaraa woundhealingefficacyofrosuvastatintransethosomalgelioptimaloptimizationhistologicalandinvivoevaluation
AT hamadabubakerm woundhealingefficacyofrosuvastatintransethosomalgelioptimaloptimizationhistologicalandinvivoevaluation
AT almurshedialanoods woundhealingefficacyofrosuvastatintransethosomalgelioptimaloptimizationhistologicalandinvivoevaluation
AT yusifrehabmohammad woundhealingefficacyofrosuvastatintransethosomalgelioptimaloptimizationhistologicalandinvivoevaluation
AT saidmayada woundhealingefficacyofrosuvastatintransethosomalgelioptimaloptimizationhistologicalandinvivoevaluation