Cargando…
Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation (rTMS), are well-known non-pharmacological approaches to improve both motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with neurodegenerative disorders. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36430251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232213775 |
_version_ | 1784837293298679808 |
---|---|
author | Guidetti, Matteo Bertini, Alessandro Pirone, Francesco Sala, Gessica Signorelli, Paola Ferrarese, Carlo Priori, Alberto Bocci, Tommaso |
author_facet | Guidetti, Matteo Bertini, Alessandro Pirone, Francesco Sala, Gessica Signorelli, Paola Ferrarese, Carlo Priori, Alberto Bocci, Tommaso |
author_sort | Guidetti, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation (rTMS), are well-known non-pharmacological approaches to improve both motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with neurodegenerative disorders. Their use is of particular interest especially for the treatment of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), as well as axial disturbances in Parkinson’s (PD), where conventional pharmacological therapies show very mild and short-lasting effects. However, their ability to interfere with disease progression over time is not well understood; recent evidence suggests that NIBS may have a neuroprotective effect, thus slowing disease progression and modulating the aggregation state of pathological proteins. In this narrative review, we gather current knowledge about neuroprotection and NIBS in neurodegenerative diseases (i.e., PD and AD), just mentioning the few results related to stroke. As further matter of debate, we discuss similarities and differences with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)—induced neuroprotective effects, and highlight possible future directions for ongoing clinical studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9692544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96925442022-11-26 Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction? Guidetti, Matteo Bertini, Alessandro Pirone, Francesco Sala, Gessica Signorelli, Paola Ferrarese, Carlo Priori, Alberto Bocci, Tommaso Int J Mol Sci Review Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation (rTMS), are well-known non-pharmacological approaches to improve both motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with neurodegenerative disorders. Their use is of particular interest especially for the treatment of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), as well as axial disturbances in Parkinson’s (PD), where conventional pharmacological therapies show very mild and short-lasting effects. However, their ability to interfere with disease progression over time is not well understood; recent evidence suggests that NIBS may have a neuroprotective effect, thus slowing disease progression and modulating the aggregation state of pathological proteins. In this narrative review, we gather current knowledge about neuroprotection and NIBS in neurodegenerative diseases (i.e., PD and AD), just mentioning the few results related to stroke. As further matter of debate, we discuss similarities and differences with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)—induced neuroprotective effects, and highlight possible future directions for ongoing clinical studies. MDPI 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9692544/ /pubmed/36430251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232213775 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Guidetti, Matteo Bertini, Alessandro Pirone, Francesco Sala, Gessica Signorelli, Paola Ferrarese, Carlo Priori, Alberto Bocci, Tommaso Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction? |
title | Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction? |
title_full | Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction? |
title_fullStr | Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction? |
title_full_unstemmed | Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction? |
title_short | Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction? |
title_sort | neuroprotection and non-invasive brain stimulation: facts or fiction? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36430251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232213775 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guidettimatteo neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction AT bertinialessandro neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction AT pironefrancesco neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction AT salagessica neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction AT signorellipaola neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction AT ferraresecarlo neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction AT priorialberto neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction AT boccitommaso neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction |