Cargando…

Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?

Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation (rTMS), are well-known non-pharmacological approaches to improve both motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with neurodegenerative disorders. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guidetti, Matteo, Bertini, Alessandro, Pirone, Francesco, Sala, Gessica, Signorelli, Paola, Ferrarese, Carlo, Priori, Alberto, Bocci, Tommaso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36430251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232213775
_version_ 1784837293298679808
author Guidetti, Matteo
Bertini, Alessandro
Pirone, Francesco
Sala, Gessica
Signorelli, Paola
Ferrarese, Carlo
Priori, Alberto
Bocci, Tommaso
author_facet Guidetti, Matteo
Bertini, Alessandro
Pirone, Francesco
Sala, Gessica
Signorelli, Paola
Ferrarese, Carlo
Priori, Alberto
Bocci, Tommaso
author_sort Guidetti, Matteo
collection PubMed
description Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation (rTMS), are well-known non-pharmacological approaches to improve both motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with neurodegenerative disorders. Their use is of particular interest especially for the treatment of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), as well as axial disturbances in Parkinson’s (PD), where conventional pharmacological therapies show very mild and short-lasting effects. However, their ability to interfere with disease progression over time is not well understood; recent evidence suggests that NIBS may have a neuroprotective effect, thus slowing disease progression and modulating the aggregation state of pathological proteins. In this narrative review, we gather current knowledge about neuroprotection and NIBS in neurodegenerative diseases (i.e., PD and AD), just mentioning the few results related to stroke. As further matter of debate, we discuss similarities and differences with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)—induced neuroprotective effects, and highlight possible future directions for ongoing clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9692544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96925442022-11-26 Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction? Guidetti, Matteo Bertini, Alessandro Pirone, Francesco Sala, Gessica Signorelli, Paola Ferrarese, Carlo Priori, Alberto Bocci, Tommaso Int J Mol Sci Review Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation (rTMS), are well-known non-pharmacological approaches to improve both motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with neurodegenerative disorders. Their use is of particular interest especially for the treatment of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), as well as axial disturbances in Parkinson’s (PD), where conventional pharmacological therapies show very mild and short-lasting effects. However, their ability to interfere with disease progression over time is not well understood; recent evidence suggests that NIBS may have a neuroprotective effect, thus slowing disease progression and modulating the aggregation state of pathological proteins. In this narrative review, we gather current knowledge about neuroprotection and NIBS in neurodegenerative diseases (i.e., PD and AD), just mentioning the few results related to stroke. As further matter of debate, we discuss similarities and differences with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)—induced neuroprotective effects, and highlight possible future directions for ongoing clinical studies. MDPI 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9692544/ /pubmed/36430251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232213775 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Guidetti, Matteo
Bertini, Alessandro
Pirone, Francesco
Sala, Gessica
Signorelli, Paola
Ferrarese, Carlo
Priori, Alberto
Bocci, Tommaso
Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?
title Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?
title_full Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?
title_fullStr Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?
title_full_unstemmed Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?
title_short Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?
title_sort neuroprotection and non-invasive brain stimulation: facts or fiction?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36430251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232213775
work_keys_str_mv AT guidettimatteo neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction
AT bertinialessandro neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction
AT pironefrancesco neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction
AT salagessica neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction
AT signorellipaola neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction
AT ferraresecarlo neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction
AT priorialberto neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction
AT boccitommaso neuroprotectionandnoninvasivebrainstimulationfactsorfiction