Cargando…

The Athlete’s Heart and Machine Learning: A Review of Current Implementations and Gaps for Future Research

Background: Intense training exercise regimes cause physiological changes within the heart to help cope with the increased stress, known as the “athlete’s heart”. These changes can mask pathological changes, making them harder to diagnose and increasing the risk of an adverse cardiac outcome. Aim: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bellfield, Ryan A. A., Ortega-Martorell, Sandra, Lip, Gregory Y. H., Oxborough, David, Olier, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36354781
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9110382
_version_ 1784837296415047680
author Bellfield, Ryan A. A.
Ortega-Martorell, Sandra
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Oxborough, David
Olier, Ivan
author_facet Bellfield, Ryan A. A.
Ortega-Martorell, Sandra
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Oxborough, David
Olier, Ivan
author_sort Bellfield, Ryan A. A.
collection PubMed
description Background: Intense training exercise regimes cause physiological changes within the heart to help cope with the increased stress, known as the “athlete’s heart”. These changes can mask pathological changes, making them harder to diagnose and increasing the risk of an adverse cardiac outcome. Aim: This paper reviews which machine learning techniques (ML) are being used within athlete’s heart research and how they are being implemented, as well as assesses the uptake of these techniques within this area of research. Methods: Searches were carried out on the Scopus and PubMed online datasets and a scoping review was conducted on the studies which were identified. Results: Twenty-eight studies were included within the review, with ML being directly referenced within 16 (57%). A total of 12 different techniques were used, with the most popular being artificial neural networks and the most common implementation being to perform classification tasks. The review also highlighted the subgroups of interest: predictive modelling, reviews, and wearables, with most of the studies being attributed to the predictive modelling subgroup. The most common type of data used was the electrocardiogram (ECG), with echocardiograms being used the second most often. Conclusion: The results show that over the last 11 years, there has been a growing desire of leveraging ML techniques to help further the understanding of the athlete’s heart, whether it be by expanding the knowledge of the physiological changes or by improving the accuracies of models to help improve the treatments and disease management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9692556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96925562022-11-26 The Athlete’s Heart and Machine Learning: A Review of Current Implementations and Gaps for Future Research Bellfield, Ryan A. A. Ortega-Martorell, Sandra Lip, Gregory Y. H. Oxborough, David Olier, Ivan J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Review Background: Intense training exercise regimes cause physiological changes within the heart to help cope with the increased stress, known as the “athlete’s heart”. These changes can mask pathological changes, making them harder to diagnose and increasing the risk of an adverse cardiac outcome. Aim: This paper reviews which machine learning techniques (ML) are being used within athlete’s heart research and how they are being implemented, as well as assesses the uptake of these techniques within this area of research. Methods: Searches were carried out on the Scopus and PubMed online datasets and a scoping review was conducted on the studies which were identified. Results: Twenty-eight studies were included within the review, with ML being directly referenced within 16 (57%). A total of 12 different techniques were used, with the most popular being artificial neural networks and the most common implementation being to perform classification tasks. The review also highlighted the subgroups of interest: predictive modelling, reviews, and wearables, with most of the studies being attributed to the predictive modelling subgroup. The most common type of data used was the electrocardiogram (ECG), with echocardiograms being used the second most often. Conclusion: The results show that over the last 11 years, there has been a growing desire of leveraging ML techniques to help further the understanding of the athlete’s heart, whether it be by expanding the knowledge of the physiological changes or by improving the accuracies of models to help improve the treatments and disease management. MDPI 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9692556/ /pubmed/36354781 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9110382 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bellfield, Ryan A. A.
Ortega-Martorell, Sandra
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Oxborough, David
Olier, Ivan
The Athlete’s Heart and Machine Learning: A Review of Current Implementations and Gaps for Future Research
title The Athlete’s Heart and Machine Learning: A Review of Current Implementations and Gaps for Future Research
title_full The Athlete’s Heart and Machine Learning: A Review of Current Implementations and Gaps for Future Research
title_fullStr The Athlete’s Heart and Machine Learning: A Review of Current Implementations and Gaps for Future Research
title_full_unstemmed The Athlete’s Heart and Machine Learning: A Review of Current Implementations and Gaps for Future Research
title_short The Athlete’s Heart and Machine Learning: A Review of Current Implementations and Gaps for Future Research
title_sort athlete’s heart and machine learning: a review of current implementations and gaps for future research
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36354781
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9110382
work_keys_str_mv AT bellfieldryanaa theathletesheartandmachinelearningareviewofcurrentimplementationsandgapsforfutureresearch
AT ortegamartorellsandra theathletesheartandmachinelearningareviewofcurrentimplementationsandgapsforfutureresearch
AT lipgregoryyh theathletesheartandmachinelearningareviewofcurrentimplementationsandgapsforfutureresearch
AT oxboroughdavid theathletesheartandmachinelearningareviewofcurrentimplementationsandgapsforfutureresearch
AT olierivan theathletesheartandmachinelearningareviewofcurrentimplementationsandgapsforfutureresearch
AT bellfieldryanaa athletesheartandmachinelearningareviewofcurrentimplementationsandgapsforfutureresearch
AT ortegamartorellsandra athletesheartandmachinelearningareviewofcurrentimplementationsandgapsforfutureresearch
AT lipgregoryyh athletesheartandmachinelearningareviewofcurrentimplementationsandgapsforfutureresearch
AT oxboroughdavid athletesheartandmachinelearningareviewofcurrentimplementationsandgapsforfutureresearch
AT olierivan athletesheartandmachinelearningareviewofcurrentimplementationsandgapsforfutureresearch