Cargando…
Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support
Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is a life-saving treatment option for patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), but many aspects such as patient selection, initiation threshold and optimal modality selection remain unclear. This study describes a standard operating procedure (SOP) for tMCS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36431066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12111931 |
_version_ | 1784837324440338432 |
---|---|
author | Ott, Sascha Lewin, Daniel Nersesian, Gaik Stein, Julia Just, Isabell A. Hommel, Matthias Schoenrath, Felix Starck, Christoph T. O’Brien, Benjamin Falk, Volkmar Potapov, Evgenij Lanmueller, Pia |
author_facet | Ott, Sascha Lewin, Daniel Nersesian, Gaik Stein, Julia Just, Isabell A. Hommel, Matthias Schoenrath, Felix Starck, Christoph T. O’Brien, Benjamin Falk, Volkmar Potapov, Evgenij Lanmueller, Pia |
author_sort | Ott, Sascha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is a life-saving treatment option for patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), but many aspects such as patient selection, initiation threshold and optimal modality selection remain unclear. This study describes a standard operating procedure (SOP) for tMCS allocation for CS patients and presents outcome data before and after implementation. Data from 421 patients treated for CS with tMCS between 2018 and 2021 were analyzed. In 2019, we implemented a new SOP for allocating CS patients to tMCS modalities. The association between the time of SOP implementation and the 30-day and 1-year survival as well as hospital discharge was evaluated. Of the 421 patients included, 189 were treated before (pre-SOP group) and 232 after implementation of the new SOP (SOP group). Causes of CS included acute myocardial infarction (n = 80, 19.0%), acute-on-chronic heart failure in patients with dilated or chronic ischemic heart failure (n = 139, 33.0%), valvular cardiomyopathy (n = 14, 3.3%) and myocarditis (n = 5, 1.2%); 102 patients suffered from postcardiotomy CS (24.2%). The SOP group was further divided into an SOP-adherent (SOP-A) and a non-SOP-adherent group (SOP-NA). The hospital discharge rate was higher in the SOP group (41.7% vs. 29.7%), and treating patients according to the SOP was associated with an improved 30-day survival (56.9% vs. 38.9%, OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.01–4.80, p = 0.044). Patient allocation according to the presented SOP significantly improved 30-day survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9692664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96926642022-11-26 Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support Ott, Sascha Lewin, Daniel Nersesian, Gaik Stein, Julia Just, Isabell A. Hommel, Matthias Schoenrath, Felix Starck, Christoph T. O’Brien, Benjamin Falk, Volkmar Potapov, Evgenij Lanmueller, Pia Life (Basel) Article Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is a life-saving treatment option for patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), but many aspects such as patient selection, initiation threshold and optimal modality selection remain unclear. This study describes a standard operating procedure (SOP) for tMCS allocation for CS patients and presents outcome data before and after implementation. Data from 421 patients treated for CS with tMCS between 2018 and 2021 were analyzed. In 2019, we implemented a new SOP for allocating CS patients to tMCS modalities. The association between the time of SOP implementation and the 30-day and 1-year survival as well as hospital discharge was evaluated. Of the 421 patients included, 189 were treated before (pre-SOP group) and 232 after implementation of the new SOP (SOP group). Causes of CS included acute myocardial infarction (n = 80, 19.0%), acute-on-chronic heart failure in patients with dilated or chronic ischemic heart failure (n = 139, 33.0%), valvular cardiomyopathy (n = 14, 3.3%) and myocarditis (n = 5, 1.2%); 102 patients suffered from postcardiotomy CS (24.2%). The SOP group was further divided into an SOP-adherent (SOP-A) and a non-SOP-adherent group (SOP-NA). The hospital discharge rate was higher in the SOP group (41.7% vs. 29.7%), and treating patients according to the SOP was associated with an improved 30-day survival (56.9% vs. 38.9%, OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.01–4.80, p = 0.044). Patient allocation according to the presented SOP significantly improved 30-day survival. MDPI 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9692664/ /pubmed/36431066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12111931 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ott, Sascha Lewin, Daniel Nersesian, Gaik Stein, Julia Just, Isabell A. Hommel, Matthias Schoenrath, Felix Starck, Christoph T. O’Brien, Benjamin Falk, Volkmar Potapov, Evgenij Lanmueller, Pia Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title | Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title_full | Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title_fullStr | Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title_short | Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title_sort | improving survival in cardiogenic shock—a propensity score-matched analysis of the impact of an institutional allocation protocol to short-term mechanical circulatory support |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36431066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12111931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ottsascha improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT lewindaniel improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT nersesiangaik improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT steinjulia improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT justisabella improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT hommelmatthias improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT schoenrathfelix improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT starckchristopht improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT obrienbenjamin improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT falkvolkmar improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT potapovevgenij improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport AT lanmuellerpia improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport |