Cargando…

Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support

Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is a life-saving treatment option for patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), but many aspects such as patient selection, initiation threshold and optimal modality selection remain unclear. This study describes a standard operating procedure (SOP) for tMCS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ott, Sascha, Lewin, Daniel, Nersesian, Gaik, Stein, Julia, Just, Isabell A., Hommel, Matthias, Schoenrath, Felix, Starck, Christoph T., O’Brien, Benjamin, Falk, Volkmar, Potapov, Evgenij, Lanmueller, Pia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36431066
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12111931
_version_ 1784837324440338432
author Ott, Sascha
Lewin, Daniel
Nersesian, Gaik
Stein, Julia
Just, Isabell A.
Hommel, Matthias
Schoenrath, Felix
Starck, Christoph T.
O’Brien, Benjamin
Falk, Volkmar
Potapov, Evgenij
Lanmueller, Pia
author_facet Ott, Sascha
Lewin, Daniel
Nersesian, Gaik
Stein, Julia
Just, Isabell A.
Hommel, Matthias
Schoenrath, Felix
Starck, Christoph T.
O’Brien, Benjamin
Falk, Volkmar
Potapov, Evgenij
Lanmueller, Pia
author_sort Ott, Sascha
collection PubMed
description Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is a life-saving treatment option for patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), but many aspects such as patient selection, initiation threshold and optimal modality selection remain unclear. This study describes a standard operating procedure (SOP) for tMCS allocation for CS patients and presents outcome data before and after implementation. Data from 421 patients treated for CS with tMCS between 2018 and 2021 were analyzed. In 2019, we implemented a new SOP for allocating CS patients to tMCS modalities. The association between the time of SOP implementation and the 30-day and 1-year survival as well as hospital discharge was evaluated. Of the 421 patients included, 189 were treated before (pre-SOP group) and 232 after implementation of the new SOP (SOP group). Causes of CS included acute myocardial infarction (n = 80, 19.0%), acute-on-chronic heart failure in patients with dilated or chronic ischemic heart failure (n = 139, 33.0%), valvular cardiomyopathy (n = 14, 3.3%) and myocarditis (n = 5, 1.2%); 102 patients suffered from postcardiotomy CS (24.2%). The SOP group was further divided into an SOP-adherent (SOP-A) and a non-SOP-adherent group (SOP-NA). The hospital discharge rate was higher in the SOP group (41.7% vs. 29.7%), and treating patients according to the SOP was associated with an improved 30-day survival (56.9% vs. 38.9%, OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.01–4.80, p = 0.044). Patient allocation according to the presented SOP significantly improved 30-day survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9692664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96926642022-11-26 Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support Ott, Sascha Lewin, Daniel Nersesian, Gaik Stein, Julia Just, Isabell A. Hommel, Matthias Schoenrath, Felix Starck, Christoph T. O’Brien, Benjamin Falk, Volkmar Potapov, Evgenij Lanmueller, Pia Life (Basel) Article Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is a life-saving treatment option for patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), but many aspects such as patient selection, initiation threshold and optimal modality selection remain unclear. This study describes a standard operating procedure (SOP) for tMCS allocation for CS patients and presents outcome data before and after implementation. Data from 421 patients treated for CS with tMCS between 2018 and 2021 were analyzed. In 2019, we implemented a new SOP for allocating CS patients to tMCS modalities. The association between the time of SOP implementation and the 30-day and 1-year survival as well as hospital discharge was evaluated. Of the 421 patients included, 189 were treated before (pre-SOP group) and 232 after implementation of the new SOP (SOP group). Causes of CS included acute myocardial infarction (n = 80, 19.0%), acute-on-chronic heart failure in patients with dilated or chronic ischemic heart failure (n = 139, 33.0%), valvular cardiomyopathy (n = 14, 3.3%) and myocarditis (n = 5, 1.2%); 102 patients suffered from postcardiotomy CS (24.2%). The SOP group was further divided into an SOP-adherent (SOP-A) and a non-SOP-adherent group (SOP-NA). The hospital discharge rate was higher in the SOP group (41.7% vs. 29.7%), and treating patients according to the SOP was associated with an improved 30-day survival (56.9% vs. 38.9%, OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.01–4.80, p = 0.044). Patient allocation according to the presented SOP significantly improved 30-day survival. MDPI 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9692664/ /pubmed/36431066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12111931 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ott, Sascha
Lewin, Daniel
Nersesian, Gaik
Stein, Julia
Just, Isabell A.
Hommel, Matthias
Schoenrath, Felix
Starck, Christoph T.
O’Brien, Benjamin
Falk, Volkmar
Potapov, Evgenij
Lanmueller, Pia
Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support
title Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support
title_full Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support
title_fullStr Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support
title_full_unstemmed Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support
title_short Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support
title_sort improving survival in cardiogenic shock—a propensity score-matched analysis of the impact of an institutional allocation protocol to short-term mechanical circulatory support
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9692664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36431066
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12111931
work_keys_str_mv AT ottsascha improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT lewindaniel improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT nersesiangaik improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT steinjulia improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT justisabella improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT hommelmatthias improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT schoenrathfelix improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT starckchristopht improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT obrienbenjamin improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT falkvolkmar improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT potapovevgenij improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT lanmuellerpia improvingsurvivalincardiogenicshockapropensityscorematchedanalysisoftheimpactofaninstitutionalallocationprotocoltoshorttermmechanicalcirculatorysupport