Cargando…
Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker
The literature since Apollo contains exhaustive material on attitude filtering, usually treating the problem of two sensors, a combination of state measuring and inertial devices. More recently, it has become popular for a sole attitude determination device to be considered. This is especially the c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433598 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22229002 |
_version_ | 1784837511805140992 |
---|---|
author | Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R. Wu, Xiaofeng Cairns, Iver H. |
author_facet | Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R. Wu, Xiaofeng Cairns, Iver H. |
author_sort | Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The literature since Apollo contains exhaustive material on attitude filtering, usually treating the problem of two sensors, a combination of state measuring and inertial devices. More recently, it has become popular for a sole attitude determination device to be considered. This is especially the case for a star tracker given its unbiased stellar measurement and recent improvements in optical sensor performance. The state device indirectly estimates the attitude rate using a known dynamic model. In estimation theory, two main attitude filtering approaches are classified, the additive and the multiplicative. Each refers to the nature of the quaternion update in the filter. In this article, these two techniques are implemented for the case of a sole star tracker, using simulated and real night sky image data. Both sets of results are presented and compared with each other, with a baseline established through a basic linear least square estimate. The state approach is more accurate and precise for measuring angular velocity than using the error-based filter. However, no discernible difference is observed between each technique for determining pointing. These results are important not only for sole device attitude determination systems, but also for space situational awareness object localisation, where attitude and rate estimate accuracy are highly important. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9693323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96933232022-11-26 Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R. Wu, Xiaofeng Cairns, Iver H. Sensors (Basel) Article The literature since Apollo contains exhaustive material on attitude filtering, usually treating the problem of two sensors, a combination of state measuring and inertial devices. More recently, it has become popular for a sole attitude determination device to be considered. This is especially the case for a star tracker given its unbiased stellar measurement and recent improvements in optical sensor performance. The state device indirectly estimates the attitude rate using a known dynamic model. In estimation theory, two main attitude filtering approaches are classified, the additive and the multiplicative. Each refers to the nature of the quaternion update in the filter. In this article, these two techniques are implemented for the case of a sole star tracker, using simulated and real night sky image data. Both sets of results are presented and compared with each other, with a baseline established through a basic linear least square estimate. The state approach is more accurate and precise for measuring angular velocity than using the error-based filter. However, no discernible difference is observed between each technique for determining pointing. These results are important not only for sole device attitude determination systems, but also for space situational awareness object localisation, where attitude and rate estimate accuracy are highly important. MDPI 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9693323/ /pubmed/36433598 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22229002 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R. Wu, Xiaofeng Cairns, Iver H. Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker |
title | Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker |
title_full | Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker |
title_fullStr | Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker |
title_short | Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker |
title_sort | treatment of extended kalman filter implementations for the gyroless star tracker |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433598 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22229002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT critchleymarrowsjoshuajr treatmentofextendedkalmanfilterimplementationsforthegyrolessstartracker AT wuxiaofeng treatmentofextendedkalmanfilterimplementationsforthegyrolessstartracker AT cairnsiverh treatmentofextendedkalmanfilterimplementationsforthegyrolessstartracker |