Cargando…

Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker

The literature since Apollo contains exhaustive material on attitude filtering, usually treating the problem of two sensors, a combination of state measuring and inertial devices. More recently, it has become popular for a sole attitude determination device to be considered. This is especially the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R., Wu, Xiaofeng, Cairns, Iver H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433598
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22229002
_version_ 1784837511805140992
author Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R.
Wu, Xiaofeng
Cairns, Iver H.
author_facet Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R.
Wu, Xiaofeng
Cairns, Iver H.
author_sort Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R.
collection PubMed
description The literature since Apollo contains exhaustive material on attitude filtering, usually treating the problem of two sensors, a combination of state measuring and inertial devices. More recently, it has become popular for a sole attitude determination device to be considered. This is especially the case for a star tracker given its unbiased stellar measurement and recent improvements in optical sensor performance. The state device indirectly estimates the attitude rate using a known dynamic model. In estimation theory, two main attitude filtering approaches are classified, the additive and the multiplicative. Each refers to the nature of the quaternion update in the filter. In this article, these two techniques are implemented for the case of a sole star tracker, using simulated and real night sky image data. Both sets of results are presented and compared with each other, with a baseline established through a basic linear least square estimate. The state approach is more accurate and precise for measuring angular velocity than using the error-based filter. However, no discernible difference is observed between each technique for determining pointing. These results are important not only for sole device attitude determination systems, but also for space situational awareness object localisation, where attitude and rate estimate accuracy are highly important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9693323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96933232022-11-26 Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R. Wu, Xiaofeng Cairns, Iver H. Sensors (Basel) Article The literature since Apollo contains exhaustive material on attitude filtering, usually treating the problem of two sensors, a combination of state measuring and inertial devices. More recently, it has become popular for a sole attitude determination device to be considered. This is especially the case for a star tracker given its unbiased stellar measurement and recent improvements in optical sensor performance. The state device indirectly estimates the attitude rate using a known dynamic model. In estimation theory, two main attitude filtering approaches are classified, the additive and the multiplicative. Each refers to the nature of the quaternion update in the filter. In this article, these two techniques are implemented for the case of a sole star tracker, using simulated and real night sky image data. Both sets of results are presented and compared with each other, with a baseline established through a basic linear least square estimate. The state approach is more accurate and precise for measuring angular velocity than using the error-based filter. However, no discernible difference is observed between each technique for determining pointing. These results are important not only for sole device attitude determination systems, but also for space situational awareness object localisation, where attitude and rate estimate accuracy are highly important. MDPI 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9693323/ /pubmed/36433598 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22229002 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Critchley-Marrows, Joshua J. R.
Wu, Xiaofeng
Cairns, Iver H.
Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker
title Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker
title_full Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker
title_fullStr Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker
title_short Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker
title_sort treatment of extended kalman filter implementations for the gyroless star tracker
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433598
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22229002
work_keys_str_mv AT critchleymarrowsjoshuajr treatmentofextendedkalmanfilterimplementationsforthegyrolessstartracker
AT wuxiaofeng treatmentofextendedkalmanfilterimplementationsforthegyrolessstartracker
AT cairnsiverh treatmentofextendedkalmanfilterimplementationsforthegyrolessstartracker