Cargando…
Hybrid of Deep Learning and Word Embedding in Generating Captions: Image-Captioning Solution for Geological Rock Images
Captioning is the process of assembling a description for an image. Previous research on captioning has usually focused on foreground objects. In captioning concepts, there are two main objects for discussion: background object and foreground object. In contrast to the previous image-captioning rese...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36354867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8110294 |
Sumario: | Captioning is the process of assembling a description for an image. Previous research on captioning has usually focused on foreground objects. In captioning concepts, there are two main objects for discussion: background object and foreground object. In contrast to the previous image-captioning research, generating captions from the geological images of rocks is more focused on the background of the images. This study proposed image captioning using a convolutional neural network, long short-term memory, and word2vec to generate words from the image. The proposed model was constructed by a convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and word2vec and gave a dense output of 256 units. To make it properly grammatical, a sequence of predicted words was reconstructed into a sentence by the beam search algorithm with K = 3. An evaluation of the pre-trained baseline model VGG16 and our proposed CNN-A, CNN-B, CNN-C, and CNN-D models used BLEU score methods for the N-gram. The BLEU scores achieved for BLEU-1 using these models were 0.5515, 0.6463, 0.7012, 0.7620, and 0.5620, respectively. BLEU-2 showed scores of 0.6048, 0.6507, 0.7083, 0.8756, and 0.6578, respectively. BLEU-3 performed with scores of 0.6414, 0.6892, 0.7312, 0.8861, and 0.7307, respectively. Finally, BLEU-4 had scores of 0.6526, 0.6504, 0.7345, 0.8250, and 0.7537, respectively. Our CNN-C model outperformed the other models, especially the baseline model. Furthermore, there are several future challenges in studying captions, such as geological sentence structure, geological sentence phrase, and constructing words by a geological tagger. |
---|