Cargando…

Acoustic Emission Source Characterisation during Fatigue Crack Growth in Al 2024-T3 Specimens

While acoustic emission (AE) testing can be used as a valuable technique in structural health monitoring and non-destructive testing, little research has been conducted to establish its sources, particularly in 2024-T3 aluminium alloys. The major contribution of this work is that it provides a metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Xinyue, Vien, Benjamin Steven, Davies, Chris, Chiu, Wing Kong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433389
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22228796
_version_ 1784837550342406144
author Yao, Xinyue
Vien, Benjamin Steven
Davies, Chris
Chiu, Wing Kong
author_facet Yao, Xinyue
Vien, Benjamin Steven
Davies, Chris
Chiu, Wing Kong
author_sort Yao, Xinyue
collection PubMed
description While acoustic emission (AE) testing can be used as a valuable technique in structural health monitoring and non-destructive testing, little research has been conducted to establish its sources, particularly in 2024-T3 aluminium alloys. The major contribution of this work is that it provides a method to obtain a better linear relationship of count rate with crack growth rate based on waveform. This paper aims to characterise AE sources by synchronising the AE waveforms with load levels and then to propose possible dominant frequency ranges. The AE waveforms during fatigue crack growth in edge-notched 2024-T3 aluminium specimens, from an initial crack length of 10 mm to 70 mm, were collected at two different load ratios R = 0.125 and 0.5. At the same time, the crack growth rate was determined using thermal imaging and associated control software. The AE waveforms obtained were processed using the fast Fourier transform. It was shown that a significantly higher AE count rate was recorded at R = 0.125 compared to R = 0.5 when the maximum load was kept the same. This means that the R-ratio would affect the total amount of AE activities collected. It was also found that the dominant frequency range of the AE waveforms directly related to crack growth was 152–487 kHz, and the ranges due to crack closure were likely to be 310 kHz–316 kHz and 500–700 kHz. Based on the proposed frequency ranges, waveform selection was conducted and a better linear relationship between count rate and crack growth rate was observed. This study provides a better understanding of the AE sources and waveforms for future structural health monitoring applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9693469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96934692022-11-26 Acoustic Emission Source Characterisation during Fatigue Crack Growth in Al 2024-T3 Specimens Yao, Xinyue Vien, Benjamin Steven Davies, Chris Chiu, Wing Kong Sensors (Basel) Article While acoustic emission (AE) testing can be used as a valuable technique in structural health monitoring and non-destructive testing, little research has been conducted to establish its sources, particularly in 2024-T3 aluminium alloys. The major contribution of this work is that it provides a method to obtain a better linear relationship of count rate with crack growth rate based on waveform. This paper aims to characterise AE sources by synchronising the AE waveforms with load levels and then to propose possible dominant frequency ranges. The AE waveforms during fatigue crack growth in edge-notched 2024-T3 aluminium specimens, from an initial crack length of 10 mm to 70 mm, were collected at two different load ratios R = 0.125 and 0.5. At the same time, the crack growth rate was determined using thermal imaging and associated control software. The AE waveforms obtained were processed using the fast Fourier transform. It was shown that a significantly higher AE count rate was recorded at R = 0.125 compared to R = 0.5 when the maximum load was kept the same. This means that the R-ratio would affect the total amount of AE activities collected. It was also found that the dominant frequency range of the AE waveforms directly related to crack growth was 152–487 kHz, and the ranges due to crack closure were likely to be 310 kHz–316 kHz and 500–700 kHz. Based on the proposed frequency ranges, waveform selection was conducted and a better linear relationship between count rate and crack growth rate was observed. This study provides a better understanding of the AE sources and waveforms for future structural health monitoring applications. MDPI 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9693469/ /pubmed/36433389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22228796 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yao, Xinyue
Vien, Benjamin Steven
Davies, Chris
Chiu, Wing Kong
Acoustic Emission Source Characterisation during Fatigue Crack Growth in Al 2024-T3 Specimens
title Acoustic Emission Source Characterisation during Fatigue Crack Growth in Al 2024-T3 Specimens
title_full Acoustic Emission Source Characterisation during Fatigue Crack Growth in Al 2024-T3 Specimens
title_fullStr Acoustic Emission Source Characterisation during Fatigue Crack Growth in Al 2024-T3 Specimens
title_full_unstemmed Acoustic Emission Source Characterisation during Fatigue Crack Growth in Al 2024-T3 Specimens
title_short Acoustic Emission Source Characterisation during Fatigue Crack Growth in Al 2024-T3 Specimens
title_sort acoustic emission source characterisation during fatigue crack growth in al 2024-t3 specimens
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433389
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22228796
work_keys_str_mv AT yaoxinyue acousticemissionsourcecharacterisationduringfatiguecrackgrowthinal2024t3specimens
AT vienbenjaminsteven acousticemissionsourcecharacterisationduringfatiguecrackgrowthinal2024t3specimens
AT davieschris acousticemissionsourcecharacterisationduringfatiguecrackgrowthinal2024t3specimens
AT chiuwingkong acousticemissionsourcecharacterisationduringfatiguecrackgrowthinal2024t3specimens