Cargando…

Comparing the Immunogenicity and Protective Effects of Three MERS-CoV Inactivation Methods in Mice

The Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is a fatal acute viral respiratory disease caused by MERS-coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection. To date, no vaccine has been approved for MERS-CoV despite continuing outbreaks. Inactivated vaccines are a viable option when developed using the appropriate inact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Nayoung, Lee, Tae-Young, Lee, Hansaem, Yang, Jeong-Sun, Kim, Kyung-Chang, Lee, Joo-Yeon, Kim, Hyun-Joo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36366352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10111843
_version_ 1784837561956433920
author Kim, Nayoung
Lee, Tae-Young
Lee, Hansaem
Yang, Jeong-Sun
Kim, Kyung-Chang
Lee, Joo-Yeon
Kim, Hyun-Joo
author_facet Kim, Nayoung
Lee, Tae-Young
Lee, Hansaem
Yang, Jeong-Sun
Kim, Kyung-Chang
Lee, Joo-Yeon
Kim, Hyun-Joo
author_sort Kim, Nayoung
collection PubMed
description The Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is a fatal acute viral respiratory disease caused by MERS-coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection. To date, no vaccine has been approved for MERS-CoV despite continuing outbreaks. Inactivated vaccines are a viable option when developed using the appropriate inactivation methods and adjuvants. In this study, we evaluated the immunogenicity and protective effects of MERS-CoV vaccine candidates inactivated by three different chemical agents. MERS-CoV was effectively inactivated by formaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and binary ethylene imine and induced humoral and cellular immunity in mice. Although inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in the lungs four days after the challenge, the immunized hDPP4-transgenic mouse group showed 100% protection against a challenge with MERS-CoV (100 LD(50)). In particular, the immune response was highly stimulated by MERS-CoV inactivated with formaldehyde, and all mice survived a challenge with the minimum dose. In the adjuvant comparison test, the group immunized with inactivated MERS-CoV and AddaVax had a higher immune response than the group immunized with aluminum potassium sulfate (alum). In conclusion, our study indicates that the three methods of MERS-CoV inactivation are highly immunogenic and protective in mice and show strong potential as vaccine candidates when used with an appropriate adjuvant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9693512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96935122022-11-26 Comparing the Immunogenicity and Protective Effects of Three MERS-CoV Inactivation Methods in Mice Kim, Nayoung Lee, Tae-Young Lee, Hansaem Yang, Jeong-Sun Kim, Kyung-Chang Lee, Joo-Yeon Kim, Hyun-Joo Vaccines (Basel) Article The Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is a fatal acute viral respiratory disease caused by MERS-coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection. To date, no vaccine has been approved for MERS-CoV despite continuing outbreaks. Inactivated vaccines are a viable option when developed using the appropriate inactivation methods and adjuvants. In this study, we evaluated the immunogenicity and protective effects of MERS-CoV vaccine candidates inactivated by three different chemical agents. MERS-CoV was effectively inactivated by formaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and binary ethylene imine and induced humoral and cellular immunity in mice. Although inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in the lungs four days after the challenge, the immunized hDPP4-transgenic mouse group showed 100% protection against a challenge with MERS-CoV (100 LD(50)). In particular, the immune response was highly stimulated by MERS-CoV inactivated with formaldehyde, and all mice survived a challenge with the minimum dose. In the adjuvant comparison test, the group immunized with inactivated MERS-CoV and AddaVax had a higher immune response than the group immunized with aluminum potassium sulfate (alum). In conclusion, our study indicates that the three methods of MERS-CoV inactivation are highly immunogenic and protective in mice and show strong potential as vaccine candidates when used with an appropriate adjuvant. MDPI 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9693512/ /pubmed/36366352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10111843 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Nayoung
Lee, Tae-Young
Lee, Hansaem
Yang, Jeong-Sun
Kim, Kyung-Chang
Lee, Joo-Yeon
Kim, Hyun-Joo
Comparing the Immunogenicity and Protective Effects of Three MERS-CoV Inactivation Methods in Mice
title Comparing the Immunogenicity and Protective Effects of Three MERS-CoV Inactivation Methods in Mice
title_full Comparing the Immunogenicity and Protective Effects of Three MERS-CoV Inactivation Methods in Mice
title_fullStr Comparing the Immunogenicity and Protective Effects of Three MERS-CoV Inactivation Methods in Mice
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Immunogenicity and Protective Effects of Three MERS-CoV Inactivation Methods in Mice
title_short Comparing the Immunogenicity and Protective Effects of Three MERS-CoV Inactivation Methods in Mice
title_sort comparing the immunogenicity and protective effects of three mers-cov inactivation methods in mice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36366352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10111843
work_keys_str_mv AT kimnayoung comparingtheimmunogenicityandprotectiveeffectsofthreemerscovinactivationmethodsinmice
AT leetaeyoung comparingtheimmunogenicityandprotectiveeffectsofthreemerscovinactivationmethodsinmice
AT leehansaem comparingtheimmunogenicityandprotectiveeffectsofthreemerscovinactivationmethodsinmice
AT yangjeongsun comparingtheimmunogenicityandprotectiveeffectsofthreemerscovinactivationmethodsinmice
AT kimkyungchang comparingtheimmunogenicityandprotectiveeffectsofthreemerscovinactivationmethodsinmice
AT leejooyeon comparingtheimmunogenicityandprotectiveeffectsofthreemerscovinactivationmethodsinmice
AT kimhyunjoo comparingtheimmunogenicityandprotectiveeffectsofthreemerscovinactivationmethodsinmice