Cargando…

Anaplasma ovis Prevalence Assessment and Cross Validation Using Multiparametric Screening Approach in Sheep from Central Tunisia

We conducted a 5-month-long screening of Anaplasma spp. and Anaplasma ovis infection in sheep from central Tunisia. During this longitudinal study, we investigated the infection dynamics using both direct and indirect assessments validated with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the gold standard...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ElHamdi, Sihem, Mhadhbi, Moez, Ben Said, Mourad, Mosbah, Amine, Gharbi, Mohamed, Klabi, Imen, Daaloul-Jedidi, Monia, Belkahia, Hanène, Selmi, Rachid, Darghouth, Mohamed Aziz, Messadi, Lilia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36422609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111358
_version_ 1784837584275374080
author ElHamdi, Sihem
Mhadhbi, Moez
Ben Said, Mourad
Mosbah, Amine
Gharbi, Mohamed
Klabi, Imen
Daaloul-Jedidi, Monia
Belkahia, Hanène
Selmi, Rachid
Darghouth, Mohamed Aziz
Messadi, Lilia
author_facet ElHamdi, Sihem
Mhadhbi, Moez
Ben Said, Mourad
Mosbah, Amine
Gharbi, Mohamed
Klabi, Imen
Daaloul-Jedidi, Monia
Belkahia, Hanène
Selmi, Rachid
Darghouth, Mohamed Aziz
Messadi, Lilia
author_sort ElHamdi, Sihem
collection PubMed
description We conducted a 5-month-long screening of Anaplasma spp. and Anaplasma ovis infection in sheep from central Tunisia. During this longitudinal study, we investigated the infection dynamics using both direct and indirect assessments validated with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the gold standard method. The experimental design included 84 male lambs aged from 6 to 8 months, and 32 ewes, both chosen randomly from June to November with a periodicity of 2 weeks approximately between June and September, and 1 month between September and November. A total of 9 field visits were carried out in this period during which animals were clinically examined and biological samples were extracted. Thus, a total of 716 blood smears, 698 sera from the nine sampling dates, as well as 220 blood samples from the first and the ninth sampling dates were collected from apparently healthy lambs and ewes, respectively, and analyzed by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, for the detection of Anaplasma antibodies and A. ovis DNA, respectively. Sera were analyzed by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and PCR, for the detection of Anaplasma antibodies and A. ovis DNA, respectively. The Anaplasma spp. initial seroprevalence rate was 33.3% in lambs and 100% in ewes, and it then flowed in an upward trend to reach a maximum of 52.6% in lambs, whereas in ewes, the Anaplasma spp. seroprevalence rate remained unchanged and equal to 100%. Meanwhile, the A. ovis initial molecular prevalence was 22.6% at the first visit and 26.3% at the last visit in lambs, whereas in ewes, the molecular prevalence rates of A. ovis were higher in both the first and the last visit estimated at 100% and 85.7%, respectively. The Kappa coefficient between cELISA and PCR indicated a moderate level of agreement on the first sampling date (0.67) and a low agreement level on the last (0.43). Furthermore, an exploratory data analysis using a multimodal machine learning approach highlighted the underlying pattern of each analytical technique used in this study. In this prospect, we were able to establish the performance of each technique at detecting Anaplasma spp. in sheep. The combination of these approaches should improve the field assessment while promoting a data-based decision in precision epidemiology. The genetic follow-up test relevant to A. ovis msp4 sequences revealed three different genotypes, two of which were previously described in Italy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9693597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96935972022-11-26 Anaplasma ovis Prevalence Assessment and Cross Validation Using Multiparametric Screening Approach in Sheep from Central Tunisia ElHamdi, Sihem Mhadhbi, Moez Ben Said, Mourad Mosbah, Amine Gharbi, Mohamed Klabi, Imen Daaloul-Jedidi, Monia Belkahia, Hanène Selmi, Rachid Darghouth, Mohamed Aziz Messadi, Lilia Pathogens Article We conducted a 5-month-long screening of Anaplasma spp. and Anaplasma ovis infection in sheep from central Tunisia. During this longitudinal study, we investigated the infection dynamics using both direct and indirect assessments validated with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the gold standard method. The experimental design included 84 male lambs aged from 6 to 8 months, and 32 ewes, both chosen randomly from June to November with a periodicity of 2 weeks approximately between June and September, and 1 month between September and November. A total of 9 field visits were carried out in this period during which animals were clinically examined and biological samples were extracted. Thus, a total of 716 blood smears, 698 sera from the nine sampling dates, as well as 220 blood samples from the first and the ninth sampling dates were collected from apparently healthy lambs and ewes, respectively, and analyzed by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, for the detection of Anaplasma antibodies and A. ovis DNA, respectively. Sera were analyzed by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and PCR, for the detection of Anaplasma antibodies and A. ovis DNA, respectively. The Anaplasma spp. initial seroprevalence rate was 33.3% in lambs and 100% in ewes, and it then flowed in an upward trend to reach a maximum of 52.6% in lambs, whereas in ewes, the Anaplasma spp. seroprevalence rate remained unchanged and equal to 100%. Meanwhile, the A. ovis initial molecular prevalence was 22.6% at the first visit and 26.3% at the last visit in lambs, whereas in ewes, the molecular prevalence rates of A. ovis were higher in both the first and the last visit estimated at 100% and 85.7%, respectively. The Kappa coefficient between cELISA and PCR indicated a moderate level of agreement on the first sampling date (0.67) and a low agreement level on the last (0.43). Furthermore, an exploratory data analysis using a multimodal machine learning approach highlighted the underlying pattern of each analytical technique used in this study. In this prospect, we were able to establish the performance of each technique at detecting Anaplasma spp. in sheep. The combination of these approaches should improve the field assessment while promoting a data-based decision in precision epidemiology. The genetic follow-up test relevant to A. ovis msp4 sequences revealed three different genotypes, two of which were previously described in Italy. MDPI 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9693597/ /pubmed/36422609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111358 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
ElHamdi, Sihem
Mhadhbi, Moez
Ben Said, Mourad
Mosbah, Amine
Gharbi, Mohamed
Klabi, Imen
Daaloul-Jedidi, Monia
Belkahia, Hanène
Selmi, Rachid
Darghouth, Mohamed Aziz
Messadi, Lilia
Anaplasma ovis Prevalence Assessment and Cross Validation Using Multiparametric Screening Approach in Sheep from Central Tunisia
title Anaplasma ovis Prevalence Assessment and Cross Validation Using Multiparametric Screening Approach in Sheep from Central Tunisia
title_full Anaplasma ovis Prevalence Assessment and Cross Validation Using Multiparametric Screening Approach in Sheep from Central Tunisia
title_fullStr Anaplasma ovis Prevalence Assessment and Cross Validation Using Multiparametric Screening Approach in Sheep from Central Tunisia
title_full_unstemmed Anaplasma ovis Prevalence Assessment and Cross Validation Using Multiparametric Screening Approach in Sheep from Central Tunisia
title_short Anaplasma ovis Prevalence Assessment and Cross Validation Using Multiparametric Screening Approach in Sheep from Central Tunisia
title_sort anaplasma ovis prevalence assessment and cross validation using multiparametric screening approach in sheep from central tunisia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36422609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111358
work_keys_str_mv AT elhamdisihem anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia
AT mhadhbimoez anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia
AT bensaidmourad anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia
AT mosbahamine anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia
AT gharbimohamed anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia
AT klabiimen anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia
AT daalouljedidimonia anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia
AT belkahiahanene anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia
AT selmirachid anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia
AT darghouthmohamedaziz anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia
AT messadililia anaplasmaovisprevalenceassessmentandcrossvalidationusingmultiparametricscreeningapproachinsheepfromcentraltunisia