Cargando…

The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: New digital health technologies are considered one solution to challenges in the health sector, which include rising numbers of chronic diseases and increased health spending. As digitalization in health care is still in its infancy, there are many unanswered questions about the impact o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angerer, Alfred, Stahl, Johanna, Krasniqi, Egzona, Banning, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355426
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37624
_version_ 1784837612840681472
author Angerer, Alfred
Stahl, Johanna
Krasniqi, Egzona
Banning, Stefan
author_facet Angerer, Alfred
Stahl, Johanna
Krasniqi, Egzona
Banning, Stefan
author_sort Angerer, Alfred
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: New digital health technologies are considered one solution to challenges in the health sector, which include rising numbers of chronic diseases and increased health spending. As digitalization in health care is still in its infancy, there are many unanswered questions about the impact of digital health on management. OBJECTIVE: This paper assesses the current state of knowledge in the field of digital health from a management perspective. It highlights research gaps within this field to determine future research opportunities. METHODS: A systematic review of digital health literature was conducted using 3 databases. The chosen articles (N=38) were classified according to a taxonomy developed for the purpose, and research gaps were identified based on the topic areas discussed. RESULTS: The literature review revealed a slight prevalence of practical (n=21, 55%) over theoretical (n=17, 45%) approaches. Most of the papers (n=23, 61%) deal with information technology (IT) and are, therefore, focused more on technology and less on management. The research question in most of the papers (n=31, 82%) deals with the creation of concepts, and very few (n=4, 11%) evaluate or even question existing solutions. Most consider the main reason for digitalization to be the optimization of operational processes (n=26, 68%), and 42% (n=16) deal with new business models. The topic area discussed most frequently was found to be eHealth (n=30, 79%). By contrast, the field of tech health with topics such as sensors receives the least attention (n=3, 8%), despite its significant potential for health care processes and strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Three main research propositions were identified. First, research into digital health innovation should not focus solely on the technology aspects but also on its implications for strategic and operational management. Second, the research community should target other domains besides eHealth. Third, we observed a lack of quantitative research on the real impact of digital health on organizations and their management. More quantitative evidence is required regarding the expected outcome and impact of the implementation of digital health solutions into our health care organizations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9693713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96937132022-11-26 The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review Angerer, Alfred Stahl, Johanna Krasniqi, Egzona Banning, Stefan JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Review BACKGROUND: New digital health technologies are considered one solution to challenges in the health sector, which include rising numbers of chronic diseases and increased health spending. As digitalization in health care is still in its infancy, there are many unanswered questions about the impact of digital health on management. OBJECTIVE: This paper assesses the current state of knowledge in the field of digital health from a management perspective. It highlights research gaps within this field to determine future research opportunities. METHODS: A systematic review of digital health literature was conducted using 3 databases. The chosen articles (N=38) were classified according to a taxonomy developed for the purpose, and research gaps were identified based on the topic areas discussed. RESULTS: The literature review revealed a slight prevalence of practical (n=21, 55%) over theoretical (n=17, 45%) approaches. Most of the papers (n=23, 61%) deal with information technology (IT) and are, therefore, focused more on technology and less on management. The research question in most of the papers (n=31, 82%) deals with the creation of concepts, and very few (n=4, 11%) evaluate or even question existing solutions. Most consider the main reason for digitalization to be the optimization of operational processes (n=26, 68%), and 42% (n=16) deal with new business models. The topic area discussed most frequently was found to be eHealth (n=30, 79%). By contrast, the field of tech health with topics such as sensors receives the least attention (n=3, 8%), despite its significant potential for health care processes and strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Three main research propositions were identified. First, research into digital health innovation should not focus solely on the technology aspects but also on its implications for strategic and operational management. Second, the research community should target other domains besides eHealth. Third, we observed a lack of quantitative research on the real impact of digital health on organizations and their management. More quantitative evidence is required regarding the expected outcome and impact of the implementation of digital health solutions into our health care organizations. JMIR Publications 2022-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9693713/ /pubmed/36355426 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37624 Text en ©Alfred Angerer, Johanna Stahl, Egzona Krasniqi, Stefan Banning. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 10.11.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Angerer, Alfred
Stahl, Johanna
Krasniqi, Egzona
Banning, Stefan
The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review
title The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review
title_full The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review
title_short The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review
title_sort management perspective in digital health literature: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355426
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37624
work_keys_str_mv AT angereralfred themanagementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview
AT stahljohanna themanagementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview
AT krasniqiegzona themanagementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview
AT banningstefan themanagementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview
AT angereralfred managementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview
AT stahljohanna managementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview
AT krasniqiegzona managementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview
AT banningstefan managementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview