Cargando…
The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: New digital health technologies are considered one solution to challenges in the health sector, which include rising numbers of chronic diseases and increased health spending. As digitalization in health care is still in its infancy, there are many unanswered questions about the impact o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355426 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37624 |
_version_ | 1784837612840681472 |
---|---|
author | Angerer, Alfred Stahl, Johanna Krasniqi, Egzona Banning, Stefan |
author_facet | Angerer, Alfred Stahl, Johanna Krasniqi, Egzona Banning, Stefan |
author_sort | Angerer, Alfred |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: New digital health technologies are considered one solution to challenges in the health sector, which include rising numbers of chronic diseases and increased health spending. As digitalization in health care is still in its infancy, there are many unanswered questions about the impact of digital health on management. OBJECTIVE: This paper assesses the current state of knowledge in the field of digital health from a management perspective. It highlights research gaps within this field to determine future research opportunities. METHODS: A systematic review of digital health literature was conducted using 3 databases. The chosen articles (N=38) were classified according to a taxonomy developed for the purpose, and research gaps were identified based on the topic areas discussed. RESULTS: The literature review revealed a slight prevalence of practical (n=21, 55%) over theoretical (n=17, 45%) approaches. Most of the papers (n=23, 61%) deal with information technology (IT) and are, therefore, focused more on technology and less on management. The research question in most of the papers (n=31, 82%) deals with the creation of concepts, and very few (n=4, 11%) evaluate or even question existing solutions. Most consider the main reason for digitalization to be the optimization of operational processes (n=26, 68%), and 42% (n=16) deal with new business models. The topic area discussed most frequently was found to be eHealth (n=30, 79%). By contrast, the field of tech health with topics such as sensors receives the least attention (n=3, 8%), despite its significant potential for health care processes and strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Three main research propositions were identified. First, research into digital health innovation should not focus solely on the technology aspects but also on its implications for strategic and operational management. Second, the research community should target other domains besides eHealth. Third, we observed a lack of quantitative research on the real impact of digital health on organizations and their management. More quantitative evidence is required regarding the expected outcome and impact of the implementation of digital health solutions into our health care organizations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9693713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96937132022-11-26 The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review Angerer, Alfred Stahl, Johanna Krasniqi, Egzona Banning, Stefan JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Review BACKGROUND: New digital health technologies are considered one solution to challenges in the health sector, which include rising numbers of chronic diseases and increased health spending. As digitalization in health care is still in its infancy, there are many unanswered questions about the impact of digital health on management. OBJECTIVE: This paper assesses the current state of knowledge in the field of digital health from a management perspective. It highlights research gaps within this field to determine future research opportunities. METHODS: A systematic review of digital health literature was conducted using 3 databases. The chosen articles (N=38) were classified according to a taxonomy developed for the purpose, and research gaps were identified based on the topic areas discussed. RESULTS: The literature review revealed a slight prevalence of practical (n=21, 55%) over theoretical (n=17, 45%) approaches. Most of the papers (n=23, 61%) deal with information technology (IT) and are, therefore, focused more on technology and less on management. The research question in most of the papers (n=31, 82%) deals with the creation of concepts, and very few (n=4, 11%) evaluate or even question existing solutions. Most consider the main reason for digitalization to be the optimization of operational processes (n=26, 68%), and 42% (n=16) deal with new business models. The topic area discussed most frequently was found to be eHealth (n=30, 79%). By contrast, the field of tech health with topics such as sensors receives the least attention (n=3, 8%), despite its significant potential for health care processes and strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Three main research propositions were identified. First, research into digital health innovation should not focus solely on the technology aspects but also on its implications for strategic and operational management. Second, the research community should target other domains besides eHealth. Third, we observed a lack of quantitative research on the real impact of digital health on organizations and their management. More quantitative evidence is required regarding the expected outcome and impact of the implementation of digital health solutions into our health care organizations. JMIR Publications 2022-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9693713/ /pubmed/36355426 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37624 Text en ©Alfred Angerer, Johanna Stahl, Egzona Krasniqi, Stefan Banning. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 10.11.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Angerer, Alfred Stahl, Johanna Krasniqi, Egzona Banning, Stefan The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review |
title | The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review |
title_full | The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review |
title_short | The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review |
title_sort | management perspective in digital health literature: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355426 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angereralfred themanagementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview AT stahljohanna themanagementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview AT krasniqiegzona themanagementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview AT banningstefan themanagementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview AT angereralfred managementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview AT stahljohanna managementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview AT krasniqiegzona managementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview AT banningstefan managementperspectiveindigitalhealthliteraturesystematicreview |