Cargando…
Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective
Twenty years after its initial introduction, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) remains today a unique standardized tool allowing uniform objective evaluation of response in solid tumors in clinical trials across different treatment indications. Several attempts have been made to...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005092 |
_version_ | 1784837652131872768 |
---|---|
author | Litière, Saskia Bogaerts, Jan |
author_facet | Litière, Saskia Bogaerts, Jan |
author_sort | Litière, Saskia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Twenty years after its initial introduction, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) remains today a unique standardized tool allowing uniform objective evaluation of response in solid tumors in clinical trials across different treatment indications. Several attempts have been made to update or replace RECIST, but none have realized the general traction or uptake seen with RECIST. This communication provides an overview of some challenges faced by RECIST in the rapidly changing oncology landscape, including the incorporation of PET with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose tracer as a tool for response assessment and the validation of criteria for use in trials involving immunotherapeutics. The latter has mainly been slow due to lack of data sharing. Work is ongoing to try to address this. We also aim to share our view as statistician representatives on the RECIST Working Group on what would be needed to validate new imaging endpoints for clinical trial use, with a specific focus on RECIST. Whether this could lead to an update of RECIST or replace RECIST altogether, depends on the changes being proposed. The ultimate goal remains to have a well defined, repeatable, confirmable and objective standard as provided by RECIST today. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9693866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96938662022-11-26 Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective Litière, Saskia Bogaerts, Jan J Immunother Cancer Review Twenty years after its initial introduction, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) remains today a unique standardized tool allowing uniform objective evaluation of response in solid tumors in clinical trials across different treatment indications. Several attempts have been made to update or replace RECIST, but none have realized the general traction or uptake seen with RECIST. This communication provides an overview of some challenges faced by RECIST in the rapidly changing oncology landscape, including the incorporation of PET with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose tracer as a tool for response assessment and the validation of criteria for use in trials involving immunotherapeutics. The latter has mainly been slow due to lack of data sharing. Work is ongoing to try to address this. We also aim to share our view as statistician representatives on the RECIST Working Group on what would be needed to validate new imaging endpoints for clinical trial use, with a specific focus on RECIST. Whether this could lead to an update of RECIST or replace RECIST altogether, depends on the changes being proposed. The ultimate goal remains to have a well defined, repeatable, confirmable and objective standard as provided by RECIST today. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9693866/ /pubmed/36424032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005092 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Litière, Saskia Bogaerts, Jan Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective |
title | Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective |
title_full | Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective |
title_fullStr | Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective |
title_short | Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective |
title_sort | imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a recist perspective |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT litieresaskia imagingendpointsforclinicaltrialusearecistperspective AT bogaertsjan imagingendpointsforclinicaltrialusearecistperspective |