Cargando…

Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective

Twenty years after its initial introduction, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) remains today a unique standardized tool allowing uniform objective evaluation of response in solid tumors in clinical trials across different treatment indications. Several attempts have been made to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Litière, Saskia, Bogaerts, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005092
_version_ 1784837652131872768
author Litière, Saskia
Bogaerts, Jan
author_facet Litière, Saskia
Bogaerts, Jan
author_sort Litière, Saskia
collection PubMed
description Twenty years after its initial introduction, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) remains today a unique standardized tool allowing uniform objective evaluation of response in solid tumors in clinical trials across different treatment indications. Several attempts have been made to update or replace RECIST, but none have realized the general traction or uptake seen with RECIST. This communication provides an overview of some challenges faced by RECIST in the rapidly changing oncology landscape, including the incorporation of PET with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose tracer as a tool for response assessment and the validation of criteria for use in trials involving immunotherapeutics. The latter has mainly been slow due to lack of data sharing. Work is ongoing to try to address this. We also aim to share our view as statistician representatives on the RECIST Working Group on what would be needed to validate new imaging endpoints for clinical trial use, with a specific focus on RECIST. Whether this could lead to an update of RECIST or replace RECIST altogether, depends on the changes being proposed. The ultimate goal remains to have a well defined, repeatable, confirmable and objective standard as provided by RECIST today.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9693866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96938662022-11-26 Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective Litière, Saskia Bogaerts, Jan J Immunother Cancer Review Twenty years after its initial introduction, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) remains today a unique standardized tool allowing uniform objective evaluation of response in solid tumors in clinical trials across different treatment indications. Several attempts have been made to update or replace RECIST, but none have realized the general traction or uptake seen with RECIST. This communication provides an overview of some challenges faced by RECIST in the rapidly changing oncology landscape, including the incorporation of PET with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose tracer as a tool for response assessment and the validation of criteria for use in trials involving immunotherapeutics. The latter has mainly been slow due to lack of data sharing. Work is ongoing to try to address this. We also aim to share our view as statistician representatives on the RECIST Working Group on what would be needed to validate new imaging endpoints for clinical trial use, with a specific focus on RECIST. Whether this could lead to an update of RECIST or replace RECIST altogether, depends on the changes being proposed. The ultimate goal remains to have a well defined, repeatable, confirmable and objective standard as provided by RECIST today. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9693866/ /pubmed/36424032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005092 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Litière, Saskia
Bogaerts, Jan
Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective
title Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective
title_full Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective
title_fullStr Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective
title_full_unstemmed Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective
title_short Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective
title_sort imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a recist perspective
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005092
work_keys_str_mv AT litieresaskia imagingendpointsforclinicaltrialusearecistperspective
AT bogaertsjan imagingendpointsforclinicaltrialusearecistperspective