Cargando…

Immediate Effects of Dry Needling on Central Pain Processing and Skin Conductance in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Although current evidence supports the use of dry needling for improving some clinical outcomes in people with neck pain, no previous research explored the effects of dry needling on the central processing of pain and autonomic nervous system in this population. Therefore, this clinical trial aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Navarro-Santana, Marcos José, Valera-Calero, Juan Antonio, Romanos-Castillo, Guillermo, Hernández-González, Victor C., Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César, López-de-Uralde-Villanueva, Ibai, Plaza-Manzano, Gustavo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9694175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36431093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226616
_version_ 1784837732986519552
author Navarro-Santana, Marcos José
Valera-Calero, Juan Antonio
Romanos-Castillo, Guillermo
Hernández-González, Victor C.
Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César
López-de-Uralde-Villanueva, Ibai
Plaza-Manzano, Gustavo
author_facet Navarro-Santana, Marcos José
Valera-Calero, Juan Antonio
Romanos-Castillo, Guillermo
Hernández-González, Victor C.
Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César
López-de-Uralde-Villanueva, Ibai
Plaza-Manzano, Gustavo
author_sort Navarro-Santana, Marcos José
collection PubMed
description Although current evidence supports the use of dry needling for improving some clinical outcomes in people with neck pain, no previous research explored the effects of dry needling on the central processing of pain and autonomic nervous system in this population. Therefore, this clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of real and sham dry needling on autonomic nervous system function, pain processing as well as clinical and psychological variables in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain. A double-blinded randomized clinical trial including 60 patients with neck pain was conducted. Patients were randomized to the real needling (n = 30) or sham needling (n = 30) group. Skin conductance (SC), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), temporal summation (TS), conditioned pain modulation (CPM) as well as pain intensity, related-disability, catastrophism, and kinesiophobia levels were assessed by an assessor blinded to the allocation intervention. The results did not find significant group * time interactions for most outcomes, except for the global percentage of change of SC values (mean: F = 35.90, p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.459; minimum: F = 33.99, p = 0.839, [Formula: see text] = 0.371; maximum: F = 24.71, p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.037) and PPTs at C5-C6 joint in the same side of needling (F = 9.982; p = 0.003; = 0.147), in favor of the dry needling group. Although the proportion of subjects experiencing moderate to large self-perceived improvement after the intervention was significantly higher (X2 = 8.297; p = 0.004) within the dry needling group (n = 18, 60%) than in the sham needling group (n = 7, 23.3%), both groups experienced similar improvements in clinical and psychological variables. Our results suggested that dry needling applied to patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain produced an immediate decrease in mechanical hyperalgesia at local sites and produced an increase in skin conductance as compared with sham needling. No changes in central pain processing were observed. A single session of sham or real dry needling was similarly effective for decreasing related disability, pain intensity, catastrophism, and kinesiophobia levels. Further studies are needed to better understand the clinical implications of autonomic nervous system activation on central sensitization and pain processing in the long-term after the application of dry needling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9694175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96941752022-11-26 Immediate Effects of Dry Needling on Central Pain Processing and Skin Conductance in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Navarro-Santana, Marcos José Valera-Calero, Juan Antonio Romanos-Castillo, Guillermo Hernández-González, Victor C. Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César López-de-Uralde-Villanueva, Ibai Plaza-Manzano, Gustavo J Clin Med Article Although current evidence supports the use of dry needling for improving some clinical outcomes in people with neck pain, no previous research explored the effects of dry needling on the central processing of pain and autonomic nervous system in this population. Therefore, this clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of real and sham dry needling on autonomic nervous system function, pain processing as well as clinical and psychological variables in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain. A double-blinded randomized clinical trial including 60 patients with neck pain was conducted. Patients were randomized to the real needling (n = 30) or sham needling (n = 30) group. Skin conductance (SC), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), temporal summation (TS), conditioned pain modulation (CPM) as well as pain intensity, related-disability, catastrophism, and kinesiophobia levels were assessed by an assessor blinded to the allocation intervention. The results did not find significant group * time interactions for most outcomes, except for the global percentage of change of SC values (mean: F = 35.90, p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.459; minimum: F = 33.99, p = 0.839, [Formula: see text] = 0.371; maximum: F = 24.71, p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.037) and PPTs at C5-C6 joint in the same side of needling (F = 9.982; p = 0.003; = 0.147), in favor of the dry needling group. Although the proportion of subjects experiencing moderate to large self-perceived improvement after the intervention was significantly higher (X2 = 8.297; p = 0.004) within the dry needling group (n = 18, 60%) than in the sham needling group (n = 7, 23.3%), both groups experienced similar improvements in clinical and psychological variables. Our results suggested that dry needling applied to patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain produced an immediate decrease in mechanical hyperalgesia at local sites and produced an increase in skin conductance as compared with sham needling. No changes in central pain processing were observed. A single session of sham or real dry needling was similarly effective for decreasing related disability, pain intensity, catastrophism, and kinesiophobia levels. Further studies are needed to better understand the clinical implications of autonomic nervous system activation on central sensitization and pain processing in the long-term after the application of dry needling. MDPI 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9694175/ /pubmed/36431093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226616 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Navarro-Santana, Marcos José
Valera-Calero, Juan Antonio
Romanos-Castillo, Guillermo
Hernández-González, Victor C.
Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César
López-de-Uralde-Villanueva, Ibai
Plaza-Manzano, Gustavo
Immediate Effects of Dry Needling on Central Pain Processing and Skin Conductance in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Immediate Effects of Dry Needling on Central Pain Processing and Skin Conductance in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Immediate Effects of Dry Needling on Central Pain Processing and Skin Conductance in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Immediate Effects of Dry Needling on Central Pain Processing and Skin Conductance in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Immediate Effects of Dry Needling on Central Pain Processing and Skin Conductance in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Immediate Effects of Dry Needling on Central Pain Processing and Skin Conductance in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort immediate effects of dry needling on central pain processing and skin conductance in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9694175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36431093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226616
work_keys_str_mv AT navarrosantanamarcosjose immediateeffectsofdryneedlingoncentralpainprocessingandskinconductanceinpatientswithchronicnonspecificneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT valeracalerojuanantonio immediateeffectsofdryneedlingoncentralpainprocessingandskinconductanceinpatientswithchronicnonspecificneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT romanoscastilloguillermo immediateeffectsofdryneedlingoncentralpainprocessingandskinconductanceinpatientswithchronicnonspecificneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hernandezgonzalezvictorc immediateeffectsofdryneedlingoncentralpainprocessingandskinconductanceinpatientswithchronicnonspecificneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fernandezdelaspenascesar immediateeffectsofdryneedlingoncentralpainprocessingandskinconductanceinpatientswithchronicnonspecificneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lopezdeuraldevillanuevaibai immediateeffectsofdryneedlingoncentralpainprocessingandskinconductanceinpatientswithchronicnonspecificneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT plazamanzanogustavo immediateeffectsofdryneedlingoncentralpainprocessingandskinconductanceinpatientswithchronicnonspecificneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial