Cargando…
Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research()
The COVID-19 pandemic emerged suddenly in early 2020, posing a serious health threat and creating tremendous stress and distress across the world. Religion has been shown to play important and varied roles in previous disasters and health crises, but its roles in the pandemic have yet to be outlined...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9694412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100075 |
_version_ | 1784837793670758400 |
---|---|
author | David, Adam B. Park, Crystal L. Awao, Sayaka Vega, Solmary Zuckerman, Madison S. White, Tyler F. Hanna, David |
author_facet | David, Adam B. Park, Crystal L. Awao, Sayaka Vega, Solmary Zuckerman, Madison S. White, Tyler F. Hanna, David |
author_sort | David, Adam B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic emerged suddenly in early 2020, posing a serious health threat and creating tremendous stress and distress across the world. Religion has been shown to play important and varied roles in previous disasters and health crises, but its roles in the pandemic have yet to be outlined. We aimed to summarize the research conducted on religion and COVID-19 in the first year of the pandemic with a systematic review of studies that specifically involved individual-level religiousness and COVID-19. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO covering a one-year period from the first published mention of the novel coronavirus (Jan. 5, 2020) through January 4, 2021. We included articles about COVID-19 that were peer-reviewed and empirical, measured and reported results on religion on an individual level, and were available in English. Our search produced 137 empirical articles that met the inclusion criteria. In the course of sorting studies by their primary focus, eight categories of empirical findings emerged: general distress and wellbeing (53 articles), COVID-19-specific stress (24 articles), beliefs in science, conspiracies, and misinformation (15 articles), COVID-19 public health behaviors (12 articles), perceived risk of COVID-19 (10 articles), perceived growth or positive changes taking place during the pandemic (nine articles), health behaviors (three articles), and consumer behavior (three articles). Findings indicated that religiousness was associated with both unique benefits and challenges and played a significant role in the pandemic. Religiousness was associated with a broad range of outcomes across geographical regions and populations during the first year of COVID-19. It was a commonly reported coping mechanism with varying levels of favorable associations with mental health and COVID-19-related behaviors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9694412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96944122022-11-25 Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research() David, Adam B. Park, Crystal L. Awao, Sayaka Vega, Solmary Zuckerman, Madison S. White, Tyler F. Hanna, David Curr Res Ecol Soc Psychol Article The COVID-19 pandemic emerged suddenly in early 2020, posing a serious health threat and creating tremendous stress and distress across the world. Religion has been shown to play important and varied roles in previous disasters and health crises, but its roles in the pandemic have yet to be outlined. We aimed to summarize the research conducted on religion and COVID-19 in the first year of the pandemic with a systematic review of studies that specifically involved individual-level religiousness and COVID-19. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO covering a one-year period from the first published mention of the novel coronavirus (Jan. 5, 2020) through January 4, 2021. We included articles about COVID-19 that were peer-reviewed and empirical, measured and reported results on religion on an individual level, and were available in English. Our search produced 137 empirical articles that met the inclusion criteria. In the course of sorting studies by their primary focus, eight categories of empirical findings emerged: general distress and wellbeing (53 articles), COVID-19-specific stress (24 articles), beliefs in science, conspiracies, and misinformation (15 articles), COVID-19 public health behaviors (12 articles), perceived risk of COVID-19 (10 articles), perceived growth or positive changes taking place during the pandemic (nine articles), health behaviors (three articles), and consumer behavior (three articles). Findings indicated that religiousness was associated with both unique benefits and challenges and played a significant role in the pandemic. Religiousness was associated with a broad range of outcomes across geographical regions and populations during the first year of COVID-19. It was a commonly reported coping mechanism with varying levels of favorable associations with mental health and COVID-19-related behaviors. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2023 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9694412/ /pubmed/36447517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100075 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article David, Adam B. Park, Crystal L. Awao, Sayaka Vega, Solmary Zuckerman, Madison S. White, Tyler F. Hanna, David Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research() |
title | Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research() |
title_full | Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research() |
title_fullStr | Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research() |
title_full_unstemmed | Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research() |
title_short | Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research() |
title_sort | religiousness in the first year of covid-19: a systematic review of empirical research() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9694412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidadamb religiousnessinthefirstyearofcovid19asystematicreviewofempiricalresearch AT parkcrystall religiousnessinthefirstyearofcovid19asystematicreviewofempiricalresearch AT awaosayaka religiousnessinthefirstyearofcovid19asystematicreviewofempiricalresearch AT vegasolmary religiousnessinthefirstyearofcovid19asystematicreviewofempiricalresearch AT zuckermanmadisons religiousnessinthefirstyearofcovid19asystematicreviewofempiricalresearch AT whitetylerf religiousnessinthefirstyearofcovid19asystematicreviewofempiricalresearch AT hannadavid religiousnessinthefirstyearofcovid19asystematicreviewofempiricalresearch |