Cargando…

Perioperative Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominal Surgery Patients Based on the Caprini or the Padua Risk Score—A Single Centre Prospective Observational Study

Surgical patients should receive perioperative thromboprophylaxis based on risk assessment, and the Caprini score is validated for this purpose. Whether the Padua score, originally devised for medical patients, can be useful in surgical patients remains to be fully clarified. This study aimed to eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klen, Jasna, Horvat, Gašper, Blinc, Aleš
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9694484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36430978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12111843
_version_ 1784837811102285824
author Klen, Jasna
Horvat, Gašper
Blinc, Aleš
author_facet Klen, Jasna
Horvat, Gašper
Blinc, Aleš
author_sort Klen, Jasna
collection PubMed
description Surgical patients should receive perioperative thromboprophylaxis based on risk assessment, and the Caprini score is validated for this purpose. Whether the Padua score, originally devised for medical patients, can be useful in surgical patients remains to be fully clarified. This study aimed to evaluate perioperative thromboprophylaxis based on the Caprini or the Padua score in elective abdominal surgery. A total of 223 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery for malignant or benign disease were prospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups in which thromboprophylaxis was prescribed according to either the Caprini score (n = 122) or the Padua score (n = 101). Patients with high-risk scores in both groups received nadroparin. The alternate risk score in each group was calculated for evaluation purposes only. During a 3-month follow-up, we assessed patients for symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding, or mortality. In the Caprini score group, 87 patients (71%) had a high risk for VTE (≥5 points), while 38 patients (38%) had a high risk for VTE (≥4 points) in the Padua score group; p < 0.00001. The overall correlation between the Caprini and Padua scores was moderate (r= 0.619), with 85 patients having high Caprini and discordant Padua scores. Ten patients died during follow-up (4.5%), and five developed non-fatal symptomatic VTE (2.2%). Among the five major bleeding incidents recorded (1.8%), two cases were possibly associated with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. The incidence of adverse outcomes did not differ between the two groups. The odds ratio for adverse outcomes was significantly higher with a high Caprini or Padua risk score, malignant disease, age ≥65 years, and active smoking. We found no significant differences in adverse outcomes between abdominal surgical patients who received perioperative thromboprophylaxis based on either the Caprini or the Padua risk score. However, a discordant Padua score was noted in almost 40% of patients who had a high Caprini score, suggesting that the latter may be more sensitive than the Padua score in surgical patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9694484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96944842022-11-26 Perioperative Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominal Surgery Patients Based on the Caprini or the Padua Risk Score—A Single Centre Prospective Observational Study Klen, Jasna Horvat, Gašper Blinc, Aleš Life (Basel) Article Surgical patients should receive perioperative thromboprophylaxis based on risk assessment, and the Caprini score is validated for this purpose. Whether the Padua score, originally devised for medical patients, can be useful in surgical patients remains to be fully clarified. This study aimed to evaluate perioperative thromboprophylaxis based on the Caprini or the Padua score in elective abdominal surgery. A total of 223 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery for malignant or benign disease were prospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups in which thromboprophylaxis was prescribed according to either the Caprini score (n = 122) or the Padua score (n = 101). Patients with high-risk scores in both groups received nadroparin. The alternate risk score in each group was calculated for evaluation purposes only. During a 3-month follow-up, we assessed patients for symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding, or mortality. In the Caprini score group, 87 patients (71%) had a high risk for VTE (≥5 points), while 38 patients (38%) had a high risk for VTE (≥4 points) in the Padua score group; p < 0.00001. The overall correlation between the Caprini and Padua scores was moderate (r= 0.619), with 85 patients having high Caprini and discordant Padua scores. Ten patients died during follow-up (4.5%), and five developed non-fatal symptomatic VTE (2.2%). Among the five major bleeding incidents recorded (1.8%), two cases were possibly associated with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. The incidence of adverse outcomes did not differ between the two groups. The odds ratio for adverse outcomes was significantly higher with a high Caprini or Padua risk score, malignant disease, age ≥65 years, and active smoking. We found no significant differences in adverse outcomes between abdominal surgical patients who received perioperative thromboprophylaxis based on either the Caprini or the Padua risk score. However, a discordant Padua score was noted in almost 40% of patients who had a high Caprini score, suggesting that the latter may be more sensitive than the Padua score in surgical patients. MDPI 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9694484/ /pubmed/36430978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12111843 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Klen, Jasna
Horvat, Gašper
Blinc, Aleš
Perioperative Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominal Surgery Patients Based on the Caprini or the Padua Risk Score—A Single Centre Prospective Observational Study
title Perioperative Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominal Surgery Patients Based on the Caprini or the Padua Risk Score—A Single Centre Prospective Observational Study
title_full Perioperative Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominal Surgery Patients Based on the Caprini or the Padua Risk Score—A Single Centre Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Perioperative Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominal Surgery Patients Based on the Caprini or the Padua Risk Score—A Single Centre Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominal Surgery Patients Based on the Caprini or the Padua Risk Score—A Single Centre Prospective Observational Study
title_short Perioperative Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominal Surgery Patients Based on the Caprini or the Padua Risk Score—A Single Centre Prospective Observational Study
title_sort perioperative prevention of venous thromboembolism in abdominal surgery patients based on the caprini or the padua risk score—a single centre prospective observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9694484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36430978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12111843
work_keys_str_mv AT klenjasna perioperativepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminabdominalsurgerypatientsbasedonthecapriniorthepaduariskscoreasinglecentreprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT horvatgasper perioperativepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminabdominalsurgerypatientsbasedonthecapriniorthepaduariskscoreasinglecentreprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT blincales perioperativepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminabdominalsurgerypatientsbasedonthecapriniorthepaduariskscoreasinglecentreprospectiveobservationalstudy