Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis

Micro-ribonucleic acid (miRNA)-based therapies show advantages for bone regeneration but need efficient intracellular delivery methods. Inorganic nanoparticles such as mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBGN) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) have received growing interest in the intr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosseinpour, Sepanta, Gomez-Cerezo, Maria Natividad, Cao, Yuxue, Lei, Chang, Dai, Huan, Walsh, Laurence J., Ivanovski, Saso, Xu, Chun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9694756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36365121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112302
_version_ 1784837884699738112
author Hosseinpour, Sepanta
Gomez-Cerezo, Maria Natividad
Cao, Yuxue
Lei, Chang
Dai, Huan
Walsh, Laurence J.
Ivanovski, Saso
Xu, Chun
author_facet Hosseinpour, Sepanta
Gomez-Cerezo, Maria Natividad
Cao, Yuxue
Lei, Chang
Dai, Huan
Walsh, Laurence J.
Ivanovski, Saso
Xu, Chun
author_sort Hosseinpour, Sepanta
collection PubMed
description Micro-ribonucleic acid (miRNA)-based therapies show advantages for bone regeneration but need efficient intracellular delivery methods. Inorganic nanoparticles such as mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBGN) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) have received growing interest in the intracellular delivery of nucleic acids. This study explores the capacity of MBGN and MSN for delivering miRNA to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) for bone regenerative purposes, with a focus on comparing the two in terms of cell viability, transfection efficiency, and osteogenic actions. Spherical MBGN and MSN with a particle size of ~200 nm and small-sized mesopores were prepared using the sol-gel method, and then the surface was modified with polyethyleneimine for miRNA loading and delivery. The results showed miRNA can be loaded into both nanoparticles within 2 h and was released sustainedly for up to 3 days. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and flow cytometry analysis indicated a high transfection efficiency (>64%) of both nanoparticles without statistical difference. Compared with MSN, MBGN showed stronger activation of alkaline phosphatase and activation of osteocalcin genes. This translated to a greater osteogenic effect of MBGN on BMSC, with Alizarin red staining showing greater mineralization compared with the MSN group. These findings show the potential for MBGN to be used in bone tissue engineering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9694756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96947562022-11-26 A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis Hosseinpour, Sepanta Gomez-Cerezo, Maria Natividad Cao, Yuxue Lei, Chang Dai, Huan Walsh, Laurence J. Ivanovski, Saso Xu, Chun Pharmaceutics Article Micro-ribonucleic acid (miRNA)-based therapies show advantages for bone regeneration but need efficient intracellular delivery methods. Inorganic nanoparticles such as mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBGN) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) have received growing interest in the intracellular delivery of nucleic acids. This study explores the capacity of MBGN and MSN for delivering miRNA to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) for bone regenerative purposes, with a focus on comparing the two in terms of cell viability, transfection efficiency, and osteogenic actions. Spherical MBGN and MSN with a particle size of ~200 nm and small-sized mesopores were prepared using the sol-gel method, and then the surface was modified with polyethyleneimine for miRNA loading and delivery. The results showed miRNA can be loaded into both nanoparticles within 2 h and was released sustainedly for up to 3 days. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and flow cytometry analysis indicated a high transfection efficiency (>64%) of both nanoparticles without statistical difference. Compared with MSN, MBGN showed stronger activation of alkaline phosphatase and activation of osteocalcin genes. This translated to a greater osteogenic effect of MBGN on BMSC, with Alizarin red staining showing greater mineralization compared with the MSN group. These findings show the potential for MBGN to be used in bone tissue engineering. MDPI 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9694756/ /pubmed/36365121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112302 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hosseinpour, Sepanta
Gomez-Cerezo, Maria Natividad
Cao, Yuxue
Lei, Chang
Dai, Huan
Walsh, Laurence J.
Ivanovski, Saso
Xu, Chun
A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis
title A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis
title_full A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis
title_short A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis
title_sort comparative study of mesoporous silica and mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles as non-viral microrna vectors for osteogenesis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9694756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36365121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112302
work_keys_str_mv AT hosseinpoursepanta acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT gomezcerezomarianatividad acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT caoyuxue acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT leichang acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT daihuan acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT walshlaurencej acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT ivanovskisaso acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT xuchun acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT hosseinpoursepanta comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT gomezcerezomarianatividad comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT caoyuxue comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT leichang comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT daihuan comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT walshlaurencej comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT ivanovskisaso comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis
AT xuchun comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis