Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis
Micro-ribonucleic acid (miRNA)-based therapies show advantages for bone regeneration but need efficient intracellular delivery methods. Inorganic nanoparticles such as mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBGN) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) have received growing interest in the intr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9694756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36365121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112302 |
_version_ | 1784837884699738112 |
---|---|
author | Hosseinpour, Sepanta Gomez-Cerezo, Maria Natividad Cao, Yuxue Lei, Chang Dai, Huan Walsh, Laurence J. Ivanovski, Saso Xu, Chun |
author_facet | Hosseinpour, Sepanta Gomez-Cerezo, Maria Natividad Cao, Yuxue Lei, Chang Dai, Huan Walsh, Laurence J. Ivanovski, Saso Xu, Chun |
author_sort | Hosseinpour, Sepanta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Micro-ribonucleic acid (miRNA)-based therapies show advantages for bone regeneration but need efficient intracellular delivery methods. Inorganic nanoparticles such as mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBGN) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) have received growing interest in the intracellular delivery of nucleic acids. This study explores the capacity of MBGN and MSN for delivering miRNA to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) for bone regenerative purposes, with a focus on comparing the two in terms of cell viability, transfection efficiency, and osteogenic actions. Spherical MBGN and MSN with a particle size of ~200 nm and small-sized mesopores were prepared using the sol-gel method, and then the surface was modified with polyethyleneimine for miRNA loading and delivery. The results showed miRNA can be loaded into both nanoparticles within 2 h and was released sustainedly for up to 3 days. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and flow cytometry analysis indicated a high transfection efficiency (>64%) of both nanoparticles without statistical difference. Compared with MSN, MBGN showed stronger activation of alkaline phosphatase and activation of osteocalcin genes. This translated to a greater osteogenic effect of MBGN on BMSC, with Alizarin red staining showing greater mineralization compared with the MSN group. These findings show the potential for MBGN to be used in bone tissue engineering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9694756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96947562022-11-26 A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis Hosseinpour, Sepanta Gomez-Cerezo, Maria Natividad Cao, Yuxue Lei, Chang Dai, Huan Walsh, Laurence J. Ivanovski, Saso Xu, Chun Pharmaceutics Article Micro-ribonucleic acid (miRNA)-based therapies show advantages for bone regeneration but need efficient intracellular delivery methods. Inorganic nanoparticles such as mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBGN) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) have received growing interest in the intracellular delivery of nucleic acids. This study explores the capacity of MBGN and MSN for delivering miRNA to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) for bone regenerative purposes, with a focus on comparing the two in terms of cell viability, transfection efficiency, and osteogenic actions. Spherical MBGN and MSN with a particle size of ~200 nm and small-sized mesopores were prepared using the sol-gel method, and then the surface was modified with polyethyleneimine for miRNA loading and delivery. The results showed miRNA can be loaded into both nanoparticles within 2 h and was released sustainedly for up to 3 days. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and flow cytometry analysis indicated a high transfection efficiency (>64%) of both nanoparticles without statistical difference. Compared with MSN, MBGN showed stronger activation of alkaline phosphatase and activation of osteocalcin genes. This translated to a greater osteogenic effect of MBGN on BMSC, with Alizarin red staining showing greater mineralization compared with the MSN group. These findings show the potential for MBGN to be used in bone tissue engineering. MDPI 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9694756/ /pubmed/36365121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112302 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hosseinpour, Sepanta Gomez-Cerezo, Maria Natividad Cao, Yuxue Lei, Chang Dai, Huan Walsh, Laurence J. Ivanovski, Saso Xu, Chun A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis |
title | A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Mesoporous Silica and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles as Non-Viral MicroRNA Vectors for Osteogenesis |
title_sort | comparative study of mesoporous silica and mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles as non-viral microrna vectors for osteogenesis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9694756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36365121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hosseinpoursepanta acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT gomezcerezomarianatividad acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT caoyuxue acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT leichang acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT daihuan acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT walshlaurencej acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT ivanovskisaso acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT xuchun acomparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT hosseinpoursepanta comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT gomezcerezomarianatividad comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT caoyuxue comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT leichang comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT daihuan comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT walshlaurencej comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT ivanovskisaso comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis AT xuchun comparativestudyofmesoporoussilicaandmesoporousbioactiveglassnanoparticlesasnonviralmicrornavectorsforosteogenesis |