Cargando…
Constant-Power versus Constant-Voltage Actuation in Frequency Sweeps for Acoustofluidic Applications
Supplying a piezoelectric transducer with constant voltage or constant power during a frequency sweep can lead to different results in the determination of the acoustofluidic resonance frequencies, which are observed when studying the acoustophoretic displacements and velocities of particles suspend...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9695504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13111886 |
_version_ | 1784838077181591552 |
---|---|
author | Lickert, Fabian Bruus, Henrik Rossi, Massimiliano |
author_facet | Lickert, Fabian Bruus, Henrik Rossi, Massimiliano |
author_sort | Lickert, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Supplying a piezoelectric transducer with constant voltage or constant power during a frequency sweep can lead to different results in the determination of the acoustofluidic resonance frequencies, which are observed when studying the acoustophoretic displacements and velocities of particles suspended in a liquid-filled microchannel. In this work, three cases are considered: (1) Constant input voltage into the power amplifier, (2) constant voltage across the piezoelectric transducer, and (3) constant average power dissipation in the transducer. For each case, the measured and the simulated responses are compared, and good agreement is obtained. It is shown that Case 1, the simplest and most frequently used approach, is largely affected by the impedance of the used amplifier and wiring, so it is therefore not suitable for a reproducible characterization of the intrinsic properties of the acoustofluidic device. Case 2 strongly favors resonances at frequencies yielding the lowest impedance of the piezoelectric transducer, so small details in the acoustic response at frequencies far from the transducer resonance can easily be missed. Case 3 provides the most reliable approach, revealing both the resonant frequency, where the power-efficiency is the highest, as well as other secondary resonances across the spectrum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9695504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96955042022-11-26 Constant-Power versus Constant-Voltage Actuation in Frequency Sweeps for Acoustofluidic Applications Lickert, Fabian Bruus, Henrik Rossi, Massimiliano Micromachines (Basel) Article Supplying a piezoelectric transducer with constant voltage or constant power during a frequency sweep can lead to different results in the determination of the acoustofluidic resonance frequencies, which are observed when studying the acoustophoretic displacements and velocities of particles suspended in a liquid-filled microchannel. In this work, three cases are considered: (1) Constant input voltage into the power amplifier, (2) constant voltage across the piezoelectric transducer, and (3) constant average power dissipation in the transducer. For each case, the measured and the simulated responses are compared, and good agreement is obtained. It is shown that Case 1, the simplest and most frequently used approach, is largely affected by the impedance of the used amplifier and wiring, so it is therefore not suitable for a reproducible characterization of the intrinsic properties of the acoustofluidic device. Case 2 strongly favors resonances at frequencies yielding the lowest impedance of the piezoelectric transducer, so small details in the acoustic response at frequencies far from the transducer resonance can easily be missed. Case 3 provides the most reliable approach, revealing both the resonant frequency, where the power-efficiency is the highest, as well as other secondary resonances across the spectrum. MDPI 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9695504/ /pubmed/36363908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13111886 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lickert, Fabian Bruus, Henrik Rossi, Massimiliano Constant-Power versus Constant-Voltage Actuation in Frequency Sweeps for Acoustofluidic Applications |
title | Constant-Power versus Constant-Voltage Actuation in Frequency Sweeps for Acoustofluidic Applications |
title_full | Constant-Power versus Constant-Voltage Actuation in Frequency Sweeps for Acoustofluidic Applications |
title_fullStr | Constant-Power versus Constant-Voltage Actuation in Frequency Sweeps for Acoustofluidic Applications |
title_full_unstemmed | Constant-Power versus Constant-Voltage Actuation in Frequency Sweeps for Acoustofluidic Applications |
title_short | Constant-Power versus Constant-Voltage Actuation in Frequency Sweeps for Acoustofluidic Applications |
title_sort | constant-power versus constant-voltage actuation in frequency sweeps for acoustofluidic applications |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9695504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13111886 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lickertfabian constantpowerversusconstantvoltageactuationinfrequencysweepsforacoustofluidicapplications AT bruushenrik constantpowerversusconstantvoltageactuationinfrequencysweepsforacoustofluidicapplications AT rossimassimiliano constantpowerversusconstantvoltageactuationinfrequencysweepsforacoustofluidicapplications |