Cargando…

Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification

Periodical vision-based inspection is a principal form of structural health monitoring (SHM) technique. Over the last decades, vision-based artificial intelligence (AI) has successfully facilitated an effortless inspection system owing to its exceptional ability of accuracy of defects’ pattern recog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arafin, Palisa, Issa, Anas, Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9695848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433318
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22228714
_version_ 1784838166054699008
author Arafin, Palisa
Issa, Anas
Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir
author_facet Arafin, Palisa
Issa, Anas
Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir
author_sort Arafin, Palisa
collection PubMed
description Periodical vision-based inspection is a principal form of structural health monitoring (SHM) technique. Over the last decades, vision-based artificial intelligence (AI) has successfully facilitated an effortless inspection system owing to its exceptional ability of accuracy of defects’ pattern recognition. However, most deep learning (DL)-based methods detect one specific type of defect, whereas DL has a high proficiency in multiple object detection. This study developed a dataset of two types of defects, i.e., concrete crack and spalling, and applied various pre-built convolutional neural network (CNN) models, i.e., VGG-19, ResNet-50, InceptionV3, Xception, and MobileNetV2 to classify these concrete defects. The dataset developed for this study has one of the largest collections of original images of concrete crack and spalling and avoided the augmentation process to replicate a more real-world condition, which makes the dataset one of a kind. Moreover, a detailed sensitivity analysis of hyper-parameters (i.e., optimizers, learning rate) was conducted to compare the classification models’ performance and identify the optimal image classification condition for the best-performed CNN model. After analyzing all the models, InceptionV3 outperformed all the other models with an accuracy of 91%, precision of 83%, and recall of 100%. The InceptionV3 model performed best with optimizer stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and a learning rate of 0.001.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9695848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96958482022-11-26 Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification Arafin, Palisa Issa, Anas Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir Sensors (Basel) Article Periodical vision-based inspection is a principal form of structural health monitoring (SHM) technique. Over the last decades, vision-based artificial intelligence (AI) has successfully facilitated an effortless inspection system owing to its exceptional ability of accuracy of defects’ pattern recognition. However, most deep learning (DL)-based methods detect one specific type of defect, whereas DL has a high proficiency in multiple object detection. This study developed a dataset of two types of defects, i.e., concrete crack and spalling, and applied various pre-built convolutional neural network (CNN) models, i.e., VGG-19, ResNet-50, InceptionV3, Xception, and MobileNetV2 to classify these concrete defects. The dataset developed for this study has one of the largest collections of original images of concrete crack and spalling and avoided the augmentation process to replicate a more real-world condition, which makes the dataset one of a kind. Moreover, a detailed sensitivity analysis of hyper-parameters (i.e., optimizers, learning rate) was conducted to compare the classification models’ performance and identify the optimal image classification condition for the best-performed CNN model. After analyzing all the models, InceptionV3 outperformed all the other models with an accuracy of 91%, precision of 83%, and recall of 100%. The InceptionV3 model performed best with optimizer stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and a learning rate of 0.001. MDPI 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9695848/ /pubmed/36433318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22228714 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Arafin, Palisa
Issa, Anas
Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir
Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification
title Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification
title_full Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification
title_short Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification
title_sort performance comparison of multiple convolutional neural networks for concrete defects classification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9695848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433318
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22228714
work_keys_str_mv AT arafinpalisa performancecomparisonofmultipleconvolutionalneuralnetworksforconcretedefectsclassification
AT issaanas performancecomparisonofmultipleconvolutionalneuralnetworksforconcretedefectsclassification
AT billahahmmuntasir performancecomparisonofmultipleconvolutionalneuralnetworksforconcretedefectsclassification