Cargando…
Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification
Periodical vision-based inspection is a principal form of structural health monitoring (SHM) technique. Over the last decades, vision-based artificial intelligence (AI) has successfully facilitated an effortless inspection system owing to its exceptional ability of accuracy of defects’ pattern recog...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9695848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22228714 |
_version_ | 1784838166054699008 |
---|---|
author | Arafin, Palisa Issa, Anas Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir |
author_facet | Arafin, Palisa Issa, Anas Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir |
author_sort | Arafin, Palisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Periodical vision-based inspection is a principal form of structural health monitoring (SHM) technique. Over the last decades, vision-based artificial intelligence (AI) has successfully facilitated an effortless inspection system owing to its exceptional ability of accuracy of defects’ pattern recognition. However, most deep learning (DL)-based methods detect one specific type of defect, whereas DL has a high proficiency in multiple object detection. This study developed a dataset of two types of defects, i.e., concrete crack and spalling, and applied various pre-built convolutional neural network (CNN) models, i.e., VGG-19, ResNet-50, InceptionV3, Xception, and MobileNetV2 to classify these concrete defects. The dataset developed for this study has one of the largest collections of original images of concrete crack and spalling and avoided the augmentation process to replicate a more real-world condition, which makes the dataset one of a kind. Moreover, a detailed sensitivity analysis of hyper-parameters (i.e., optimizers, learning rate) was conducted to compare the classification models’ performance and identify the optimal image classification condition for the best-performed CNN model. After analyzing all the models, InceptionV3 outperformed all the other models with an accuracy of 91%, precision of 83%, and recall of 100%. The InceptionV3 model performed best with optimizer stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and a learning rate of 0.001. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9695848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96958482022-11-26 Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification Arafin, Palisa Issa, Anas Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir Sensors (Basel) Article Periodical vision-based inspection is a principal form of structural health monitoring (SHM) technique. Over the last decades, vision-based artificial intelligence (AI) has successfully facilitated an effortless inspection system owing to its exceptional ability of accuracy of defects’ pattern recognition. However, most deep learning (DL)-based methods detect one specific type of defect, whereas DL has a high proficiency in multiple object detection. This study developed a dataset of two types of defects, i.e., concrete crack and spalling, and applied various pre-built convolutional neural network (CNN) models, i.e., VGG-19, ResNet-50, InceptionV3, Xception, and MobileNetV2 to classify these concrete defects. The dataset developed for this study has one of the largest collections of original images of concrete crack and spalling and avoided the augmentation process to replicate a more real-world condition, which makes the dataset one of a kind. Moreover, a detailed sensitivity analysis of hyper-parameters (i.e., optimizers, learning rate) was conducted to compare the classification models’ performance and identify the optimal image classification condition for the best-performed CNN model. After analyzing all the models, InceptionV3 outperformed all the other models with an accuracy of 91%, precision of 83%, and recall of 100%. The InceptionV3 model performed best with optimizer stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and a learning rate of 0.001. MDPI 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9695848/ /pubmed/36433318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22228714 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Arafin, Palisa Issa, Anas Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification |
title | Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification |
title_full | Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification |
title_fullStr | Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification |
title_short | Performance Comparison of Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Defects Classification |
title_sort | performance comparison of multiple convolutional neural networks for concrete defects classification |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9695848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22228714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arafinpalisa performancecomparisonofmultipleconvolutionalneuralnetworksforconcretedefectsclassification AT issaanas performancecomparisonofmultipleconvolutionalneuralnetworksforconcretedefectsclassification AT billahahmmuntasir performancecomparisonofmultipleconvolutionalneuralnetworksforconcretedefectsclassification |