Cargando…
Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System
Reinforced concrete (RC) structures with non-seismic reinforcement details are vulnerable to earthquakes. This experimental study evaluates the efficiency of three techniques to alleviate the dynamic responses of existing structures: glass fiber-reinforced polyurea (GFRPU) reinforcement, a lever-typ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9696104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433105 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14224979 |
_version_ | 1784838234313850880 |
---|---|
author | An, Jae-Hyoung Song, Jun-Hyeok Jang, Hye-Sook Roh, Pil-Sung Eun, Hee-Chang |
author_facet | An, Jae-Hyoung Song, Jun-Hyeok Jang, Hye-Sook Roh, Pil-Sung Eun, Hee-Chang |
author_sort | An, Jae-Hyoung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reinforced concrete (RC) structures with non-seismic reinforcement details are vulnerable to earthquakes. This experimental study evaluates the efficiency of three techniques to alleviate the dynamic responses of existing structures: glass fiber-reinforced polyurea (GFRPU) reinforcement, a lever-typed tuned mass damper (LTMD) system, and a hybrid system of GFRPU and LTMD reinforcements. The lateral-resisting capacity and ductility of the GFRPU reinforcement specimen were enhanced by the material characteristics, and the dynamic responses were alleviated. The LTMD control specimen controlled the dynamic responses by the passive control system of the tuned mass damper (TMD), and the control forces to sustain its geometric motion were exerted on the specimen. The hybrid system was designed to control the dynamic responses by the GFRPU reinforcement and the LTMD control system. Four specimens, including an unreinforced specimen, were tested under external excitations, including the El Centro earthquake. The vibrations were more controlled in the order of the GFRPU reinforcement specimen, the LTMD control specimen, and the hybrid control specimen. The hybrid system was evaluated as excellent for seismic reinforcement, such as preventing abrupt failure with the lateral-resisting capacity and ductility of GFRPU and improving the dynamic control capacity by LTMD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9696104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96961042022-11-26 Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System An, Jae-Hyoung Song, Jun-Hyeok Jang, Hye-Sook Roh, Pil-Sung Eun, Hee-Chang Polymers (Basel) Article Reinforced concrete (RC) structures with non-seismic reinforcement details are vulnerable to earthquakes. This experimental study evaluates the efficiency of three techniques to alleviate the dynamic responses of existing structures: glass fiber-reinforced polyurea (GFRPU) reinforcement, a lever-typed tuned mass damper (LTMD) system, and a hybrid system of GFRPU and LTMD reinforcements. The lateral-resisting capacity and ductility of the GFRPU reinforcement specimen were enhanced by the material characteristics, and the dynamic responses were alleviated. The LTMD control specimen controlled the dynamic responses by the passive control system of the tuned mass damper (TMD), and the control forces to sustain its geometric motion were exerted on the specimen. The hybrid system was designed to control the dynamic responses by the GFRPU reinforcement and the LTMD control system. Four specimens, including an unreinforced specimen, were tested under external excitations, including the El Centro earthquake. The vibrations were more controlled in the order of the GFRPU reinforcement specimen, the LTMD control specimen, and the hybrid control specimen. The hybrid system was evaluated as excellent for seismic reinforcement, such as preventing abrupt failure with the lateral-resisting capacity and ductility of GFRPU and improving the dynamic control capacity by LTMD. MDPI 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9696104/ /pubmed/36433105 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14224979 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article An, Jae-Hyoung Song, Jun-Hyeok Jang, Hye-Sook Roh, Pil-Sung Eun, Hee-Chang Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System |
title | Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System |
title_full | Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System |
title_short | Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System |
title_sort | comparison of dynamic vibration control techniques by the gfrpu and/or ltmd system |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9696104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433105 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14224979 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anjaehyoung comparisonofdynamicvibrationcontroltechniquesbythegfrpuandorltmdsystem AT songjunhyeok comparisonofdynamicvibrationcontroltechniquesbythegfrpuandorltmdsystem AT janghyesook comparisonofdynamicvibrationcontroltechniquesbythegfrpuandorltmdsystem AT rohpilsung comparisonofdynamicvibrationcontroltechniquesbythegfrpuandorltmdsystem AT eunheechang comparisonofdynamicvibrationcontroltechniquesbythegfrpuandorltmdsystem |