Cargando…

Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System

Reinforced concrete (RC) structures with non-seismic reinforcement details are vulnerable to earthquakes. This experimental study evaluates the efficiency of three techniques to alleviate the dynamic responses of existing structures: glass fiber-reinforced polyurea (GFRPU) reinforcement, a lever-typ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Jae-Hyoung, Song, Jun-Hyeok, Jang, Hye-Sook, Roh, Pil-Sung, Eun, Hee-Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9696104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14224979
_version_ 1784838234313850880
author An, Jae-Hyoung
Song, Jun-Hyeok
Jang, Hye-Sook
Roh, Pil-Sung
Eun, Hee-Chang
author_facet An, Jae-Hyoung
Song, Jun-Hyeok
Jang, Hye-Sook
Roh, Pil-Sung
Eun, Hee-Chang
author_sort An, Jae-Hyoung
collection PubMed
description Reinforced concrete (RC) structures with non-seismic reinforcement details are vulnerable to earthquakes. This experimental study evaluates the efficiency of three techniques to alleviate the dynamic responses of existing structures: glass fiber-reinforced polyurea (GFRPU) reinforcement, a lever-typed tuned mass damper (LTMD) system, and a hybrid system of GFRPU and LTMD reinforcements. The lateral-resisting capacity and ductility of the GFRPU reinforcement specimen were enhanced by the material characteristics, and the dynamic responses were alleviated. The LTMD control specimen controlled the dynamic responses by the passive control system of the tuned mass damper (TMD), and the control forces to sustain its geometric motion were exerted on the specimen. The hybrid system was designed to control the dynamic responses by the GFRPU reinforcement and the LTMD control system. Four specimens, including an unreinforced specimen, were tested under external excitations, including the El Centro earthquake. The vibrations were more controlled in the order of the GFRPU reinforcement specimen, the LTMD control specimen, and the hybrid control specimen. The hybrid system was evaluated as excellent for seismic reinforcement, such as preventing abrupt failure with the lateral-resisting capacity and ductility of GFRPU and improving the dynamic control capacity by LTMD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9696104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96961042022-11-26 Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System An, Jae-Hyoung Song, Jun-Hyeok Jang, Hye-Sook Roh, Pil-Sung Eun, Hee-Chang Polymers (Basel) Article Reinforced concrete (RC) structures with non-seismic reinforcement details are vulnerable to earthquakes. This experimental study evaluates the efficiency of three techniques to alleviate the dynamic responses of existing structures: glass fiber-reinforced polyurea (GFRPU) reinforcement, a lever-typed tuned mass damper (LTMD) system, and a hybrid system of GFRPU and LTMD reinforcements. The lateral-resisting capacity and ductility of the GFRPU reinforcement specimen were enhanced by the material characteristics, and the dynamic responses were alleviated. The LTMD control specimen controlled the dynamic responses by the passive control system of the tuned mass damper (TMD), and the control forces to sustain its geometric motion were exerted on the specimen. The hybrid system was designed to control the dynamic responses by the GFRPU reinforcement and the LTMD control system. Four specimens, including an unreinforced specimen, were tested under external excitations, including the El Centro earthquake. The vibrations were more controlled in the order of the GFRPU reinforcement specimen, the LTMD control specimen, and the hybrid control specimen. The hybrid system was evaluated as excellent for seismic reinforcement, such as preventing abrupt failure with the lateral-resisting capacity and ductility of GFRPU and improving the dynamic control capacity by LTMD. MDPI 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9696104/ /pubmed/36433105 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14224979 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
An, Jae-Hyoung
Song, Jun-Hyeok
Jang, Hye-Sook
Roh, Pil-Sung
Eun, Hee-Chang
Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System
title Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System
title_full Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System
title_fullStr Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System
title_short Comparison of Dynamic Vibration Control Techniques by the GFRPU and/or LTMD System
title_sort comparison of dynamic vibration control techniques by the gfrpu and/or ltmd system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9696104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14224979
work_keys_str_mv AT anjaehyoung comparisonofdynamicvibrationcontroltechniquesbythegfrpuandorltmdsystem
AT songjunhyeok comparisonofdynamicvibrationcontroltechniquesbythegfrpuandorltmdsystem
AT janghyesook comparisonofdynamicvibrationcontroltechniquesbythegfrpuandorltmdsystem
AT rohpilsung comparisonofdynamicvibrationcontroltechniquesbythegfrpuandorltmdsystem
AT eunheechang comparisonofdynamicvibrationcontroltechniquesbythegfrpuandorltmdsystem