Cargando…

Evaluating CNC Milling Performance for Machining AISI 316 Stainless Steel with Carbide Cutting Tool Insert

The present study investigates the CNC milling performance of the machining of AISI 316 stainless steel using a carbide cutting tool insert. Three critical machining parameters, namely cutting speed (v), feed rate (f) and depth of cut (d), each at three levels, are chosen as input machining paramete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Equbal, Azhar, Equbal, Md. Asif, Equbal, Md. Israr, Ravindrannair, Pranav, Khan, Zahid A., Badruddin, Irfan Anjum, Kamangar, Sarfaraz, Tirth, Vineet, Javed, Syed, Kittur, M. I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9696204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36431537
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15228051
_version_ 1784838249883107328
author Equbal, Azhar
Equbal, Md. Asif
Equbal, Md. Israr
Ravindrannair, Pranav
Khan, Zahid A.
Badruddin, Irfan Anjum
Kamangar, Sarfaraz
Tirth, Vineet
Javed, Syed
Kittur, M. I.
author_facet Equbal, Azhar
Equbal, Md. Asif
Equbal, Md. Israr
Ravindrannair, Pranav
Khan, Zahid A.
Badruddin, Irfan Anjum
Kamangar, Sarfaraz
Tirth, Vineet
Javed, Syed
Kittur, M. I.
author_sort Equbal, Azhar
collection PubMed
description The present study investigates the CNC milling performance of the machining of AISI 316 stainless steel using a carbide cutting tool insert. Three critical machining parameters, namely cutting speed (v), feed rate (f) and depth of cut (d), each at three levels, are chosen as input machining parameters. The face-centred central composite design (FCCCD) of the experiment is based on response surface methodology (RSM), and machining performances are measured in terms of material removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness (SR). Analysis of variance, response graphs, and three-dimensional surface plots are used to analyse experimental results. Multi-response optimization using the data envelopment analysis based ranking (DEAR) approach is used to find the ideal configuration of the machining parameters for milling AISI 316 SS. The variables v = 220 m/min, f = 0.20 mm/rev and d = 1.2 mm were obtained as the optimal machine parameter setting. Study reveals that MRR is affected dominantly by d followed by v. For SR, f is the dominating factor followed by d. SR is found to be almost unaffected by v. Finally, it is important to state that this work made an attempt to successfully machine AISI 316 SS with a carbide cutting tool insert, to investigate the effect of important machining parameters on MRR and SR and also to optimize the multiple output response using DEAR method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9696204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96962042022-11-26 Evaluating CNC Milling Performance for Machining AISI 316 Stainless Steel with Carbide Cutting Tool Insert Equbal, Azhar Equbal, Md. Asif Equbal, Md. Israr Ravindrannair, Pranav Khan, Zahid A. Badruddin, Irfan Anjum Kamangar, Sarfaraz Tirth, Vineet Javed, Syed Kittur, M. I. Materials (Basel) Article The present study investigates the CNC milling performance of the machining of AISI 316 stainless steel using a carbide cutting tool insert. Three critical machining parameters, namely cutting speed (v), feed rate (f) and depth of cut (d), each at three levels, are chosen as input machining parameters. The face-centred central composite design (FCCCD) of the experiment is based on response surface methodology (RSM), and machining performances are measured in terms of material removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness (SR). Analysis of variance, response graphs, and three-dimensional surface plots are used to analyse experimental results. Multi-response optimization using the data envelopment analysis based ranking (DEAR) approach is used to find the ideal configuration of the machining parameters for milling AISI 316 SS. The variables v = 220 m/min, f = 0.20 mm/rev and d = 1.2 mm were obtained as the optimal machine parameter setting. Study reveals that MRR is affected dominantly by d followed by v. For SR, f is the dominating factor followed by d. SR is found to be almost unaffected by v. Finally, it is important to state that this work made an attempt to successfully machine AISI 316 SS with a carbide cutting tool insert, to investigate the effect of important machining parameters on MRR and SR and also to optimize the multiple output response using DEAR method. MDPI 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9696204/ /pubmed/36431537 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15228051 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Equbal, Azhar
Equbal, Md. Asif
Equbal, Md. Israr
Ravindrannair, Pranav
Khan, Zahid A.
Badruddin, Irfan Anjum
Kamangar, Sarfaraz
Tirth, Vineet
Javed, Syed
Kittur, M. I.
Evaluating CNC Milling Performance for Machining AISI 316 Stainless Steel with Carbide Cutting Tool Insert
title Evaluating CNC Milling Performance for Machining AISI 316 Stainless Steel with Carbide Cutting Tool Insert
title_full Evaluating CNC Milling Performance for Machining AISI 316 Stainless Steel with Carbide Cutting Tool Insert
title_fullStr Evaluating CNC Milling Performance for Machining AISI 316 Stainless Steel with Carbide Cutting Tool Insert
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating CNC Milling Performance for Machining AISI 316 Stainless Steel with Carbide Cutting Tool Insert
title_short Evaluating CNC Milling Performance for Machining AISI 316 Stainless Steel with Carbide Cutting Tool Insert
title_sort evaluating cnc milling performance for machining aisi 316 stainless steel with carbide cutting tool insert
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9696204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36431537
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15228051
work_keys_str_mv AT equbalazhar evaluatingcncmillingperformanceformachiningaisi316stainlesssteelwithcarbidecuttingtoolinsert
AT equbalmdasif evaluatingcncmillingperformanceformachiningaisi316stainlesssteelwithcarbidecuttingtoolinsert
AT equbalmdisrar evaluatingcncmillingperformanceformachiningaisi316stainlesssteelwithcarbidecuttingtoolinsert
AT ravindrannairpranav evaluatingcncmillingperformanceformachiningaisi316stainlesssteelwithcarbidecuttingtoolinsert
AT khanzahida evaluatingcncmillingperformanceformachiningaisi316stainlesssteelwithcarbidecuttingtoolinsert
AT badruddinirfananjum evaluatingcncmillingperformanceformachiningaisi316stainlesssteelwithcarbidecuttingtoolinsert
AT kamangarsarfaraz evaluatingcncmillingperformanceformachiningaisi316stainlesssteelwithcarbidecuttingtoolinsert
AT tirthvineet evaluatingcncmillingperformanceformachiningaisi316stainlesssteelwithcarbidecuttingtoolinsert
AT javedsyed evaluatingcncmillingperformanceformachiningaisi316stainlesssteelwithcarbidecuttingtoolinsert
AT kitturmi evaluatingcncmillingperformanceformachiningaisi316stainlesssteelwithcarbidecuttingtoolinsert