Cargando…

Capturing Eating Behavior from Video Analysis: A Systematic Review

Current methods to detect eating behavior events (i.e., bites, chews, and swallows) lack objective measurements, standard procedures, and automation. The video recordings of eating episodes provide a non-invasive and scalable source for automation. Here, we reviewed the current methods to automatica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tufano, Michele, Lasschuijt, Marlou, Chauhan, Aneesh, Feskens, Edith J. M., Camps, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9697383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36432533
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14224847
_version_ 1784838548983119872
author Tufano, Michele
Lasschuijt, Marlou
Chauhan, Aneesh
Feskens, Edith J. M.
Camps, Guido
author_facet Tufano, Michele
Lasschuijt, Marlou
Chauhan, Aneesh
Feskens, Edith J. M.
Camps, Guido
author_sort Tufano, Michele
collection PubMed
description Current methods to detect eating behavior events (i.e., bites, chews, and swallows) lack objective measurements, standard procedures, and automation. The video recordings of eating episodes provide a non-invasive and scalable source for automation. Here, we reviewed the current methods to automatically detect eating behavior events from video recordings. According to PRISMA guidelines, publications from 2010–2021 in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were screened through title and abstract, leading to the identification of 277 publications. We screened the full text of 52 publications and included 13 for analysis. We classified the methods in five distinct categories based on their similarities and analyzed their accuracy. Facial landmarks can count bites, chews, and food liking automatically (accuracy: 90%, 60%, 25%). Deep neural networks can detect bites and gesture intake (accuracy: 91%, 86%). The active appearance model can detect chewing (accuracy: 93%), and optical flow can count chews (accuracy: 88%). Video fluoroscopy can track swallows but is currently not suitable beyond clinical settings. The optimal method for automated counts of bites and chews is facial landmarks, although further improvements are required. Future methods should accurately predict bites, chews, and swallows using inexpensive hardware and limited computational capacity. Automatic eating behavior analysis will allow the study of eating behavior and real-time interventions to promote healthy eating behaviors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9697383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96973832022-11-26 Capturing Eating Behavior from Video Analysis: A Systematic Review Tufano, Michele Lasschuijt, Marlou Chauhan, Aneesh Feskens, Edith J. M. Camps, Guido Nutrients Systematic Review Current methods to detect eating behavior events (i.e., bites, chews, and swallows) lack objective measurements, standard procedures, and automation. The video recordings of eating episodes provide a non-invasive and scalable source for automation. Here, we reviewed the current methods to automatically detect eating behavior events from video recordings. According to PRISMA guidelines, publications from 2010–2021 in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were screened through title and abstract, leading to the identification of 277 publications. We screened the full text of 52 publications and included 13 for analysis. We classified the methods in five distinct categories based on their similarities and analyzed their accuracy. Facial landmarks can count bites, chews, and food liking automatically (accuracy: 90%, 60%, 25%). Deep neural networks can detect bites and gesture intake (accuracy: 91%, 86%). The active appearance model can detect chewing (accuracy: 93%), and optical flow can count chews (accuracy: 88%). Video fluoroscopy can track swallows but is currently not suitable beyond clinical settings. The optimal method for automated counts of bites and chews is facial landmarks, although further improvements are required. Future methods should accurately predict bites, chews, and swallows using inexpensive hardware and limited computational capacity. Automatic eating behavior analysis will allow the study of eating behavior and real-time interventions to promote healthy eating behaviors. MDPI 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9697383/ /pubmed/36432533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14224847 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Tufano, Michele
Lasschuijt, Marlou
Chauhan, Aneesh
Feskens, Edith J. M.
Camps, Guido
Capturing Eating Behavior from Video Analysis: A Systematic Review
title Capturing Eating Behavior from Video Analysis: A Systematic Review
title_full Capturing Eating Behavior from Video Analysis: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Capturing Eating Behavior from Video Analysis: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Capturing Eating Behavior from Video Analysis: A Systematic Review
title_short Capturing Eating Behavior from Video Analysis: A Systematic Review
title_sort capturing eating behavior from video analysis: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9697383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36432533
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14224847
work_keys_str_mv AT tufanomichele capturingeatingbehaviorfromvideoanalysisasystematicreview
AT lasschuijtmarlou capturingeatingbehaviorfromvideoanalysisasystematicreview
AT chauhananeesh capturingeatingbehaviorfromvideoanalysisasystematicreview
AT feskensedithjm capturingeatingbehaviorfromvideoanalysisasystematicreview
AT campsguido capturingeatingbehaviorfromvideoanalysisasystematicreview