Cargando…

Patient and Family Involvement in Serious Incident Investigations From the Perspectives of Key Stakeholders: A Review of the Qualitative Evidence

Investigations of healthcare harm often overlook the valuable insights of patients and families. Our review aimed to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders when patients and families were involved in serious incident investigations. METHODS: The authors searched three databases (Medline, PsycI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramsey, Lauren, McHugh, Siobhan, Simms-Ellis, Ruth, Perfetto, Kayley, O’Hara, Jane K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35921645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001054
_version_ 1784838756174397440
author Ramsey, Lauren
McHugh, Siobhan
Simms-Ellis, Ruth
Perfetto, Kayley
O’Hara, Jane K.
author_facet Ramsey, Lauren
McHugh, Siobhan
Simms-Ellis, Ruth
Perfetto, Kayley
O’Hara, Jane K.
author_sort Ramsey, Lauren
collection PubMed
description Investigations of healthcare harm often overlook the valuable insights of patients and families. Our review aimed to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders when patients and families were involved in serious incident investigations. METHODS: The authors searched three databases (Medline, PsycInfo, and CINAHL) and Connected Papers software for qualitative studies in which patients and families were involved in serious incident investigations until no new articles were found. RESULTS: Twenty-seven papers were eligible. The perspectives of patients and families, healthcare professionals, nonclinical staff, and legal staff were sought across acute, mental health and maternity settings. Most patients and families valued being involved; however, it was important that investigations were flexible and sensitive to both clinical and emotional aspects of care to avoid compounding harm. This included the following: early active listening with empathy for trauma, sincere and timely apology, fostering trust and transparency, making realistic timelines clear, and establishing effective nonadversarial communication. Most staff perceived that patient and family involvement could improve investigation quality, promote an open culture, and help ensure future safety. However, it was made difficult when multidisciplinary input was absent, workload and staff turnover were high, training and support needs were unmet, and fears surrounded litigation. Potential solutions included enhancing the clarity of roles and responsibilities, adequately training staff, and providing long and short-term support to stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: Our review provides insights to ensure patient and family involvement in serious incident investigations considers both clinical and emotional aspects of care, is meaningful for all key stakeholders, and avoids compounding harm. However, significant gaps in the literature remain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9698195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96981952022-11-28 Patient and Family Involvement in Serious Incident Investigations From the Perspectives of Key Stakeholders: A Review of the Qualitative Evidence Ramsey, Lauren McHugh, Siobhan Simms-Ellis, Ruth Perfetto, Kayley O’Hara, Jane K. J Patient Saf Review Articles Investigations of healthcare harm often overlook the valuable insights of patients and families. Our review aimed to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders when patients and families were involved in serious incident investigations. METHODS: The authors searched three databases (Medline, PsycInfo, and CINAHL) and Connected Papers software for qualitative studies in which patients and families were involved in serious incident investigations until no new articles were found. RESULTS: Twenty-seven papers were eligible. The perspectives of patients and families, healthcare professionals, nonclinical staff, and legal staff were sought across acute, mental health and maternity settings. Most patients and families valued being involved; however, it was important that investigations were flexible and sensitive to both clinical and emotional aspects of care to avoid compounding harm. This included the following: early active listening with empathy for trauma, sincere and timely apology, fostering trust and transparency, making realistic timelines clear, and establishing effective nonadversarial communication. Most staff perceived that patient and family involvement could improve investigation quality, promote an open culture, and help ensure future safety. However, it was made difficult when multidisciplinary input was absent, workload and staff turnover were high, training and support needs were unmet, and fears surrounded litigation. Potential solutions included enhancing the clarity of roles and responsibilities, adequately training staff, and providing long and short-term support to stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: Our review provides insights to ensure patient and family involvement in serious incident investigations considers both clinical and emotional aspects of care, is meaningful for all key stakeholders, and avoids compounding harm. However, significant gaps in the literature remain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9698195/ /pubmed/35921645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001054 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Ramsey, Lauren
McHugh, Siobhan
Simms-Ellis, Ruth
Perfetto, Kayley
O’Hara, Jane K.
Patient and Family Involvement in Serious Incident Investigations From the Perspectives of Key Stakeholders: A Review of the Qualitative Evidence
title Patient and Family Involvement in Serious Incident Investigations From the Perspectives of Key Stakeholders: A Review of the Qualitative Evidence
title_full Patient and Family Involvement in Serious Incident Investigations From the Perspectives of Key Stakeholders: A Review of the Qualitative Evidence
title_fullStr Patient and Family Involvement in Serious Incident Investigations From the Perspectives of Key Stakeholders: A Review of the Qualitative Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Patient and Family Involvement in Serious Incident Investigations From the Perspectives of Key Stakeholders: A Review of the Qualitative Evidence
title_short Patient and Family Involvement in Serious Incident Investigations From the Perspectives of Key Stakeholders: A Review of the Qualitative Evidence
title_sort patient and family involvement in serious incident investigations from the perspectives of key stakeholders: a review of the qualitative evidence
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35921645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001054
work_keys_str_mv AT ramseylauren patientandfamilyinvolvementinseriousincidentinvestigationsfromtheperspectivesofkeystakeholdersareviewofthequalitativeevidence
AT mchughsiobhan patientandfamilyinvolvementinseriousincidentinvestigationsfromtheperspectivesofkeystakeholdersareviewofthequalitativeevidence
AT simmsellisruth patientandfamilyinvolvementinseriousincidentinvestigationsfromtheperspectivesofkeystakeholdersareviewofthequalitativeevidence
AT perfettokayley patientandfamilyinvolvementinseriousincidentinvestigationsfromtheperspectivesofkeystakeholdersareviewofthequalitativeevidence
AT oharajanek patientandfamilyinvolvementinseriousincidentinvestigationsfromtheperspectivesofkeystakeholdersareviewofthequalitativeevidence