Cargando…
Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis
Background and Objectives: To estimate the clinical outcomes of uniportal and biportal full-endoscopic spine surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (LDD), and to provide the latest evidence for clinical selection. Materials and Methods: Relevant literatures published in PubMed, Web...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111523 |
_version_ | 1784838762725900288 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Wen-Bin Kotheeranurak, Vit Zhang, Huang-Lin Chen, Zhang-Xin Wu, Hua-Jian Chen, Chien-Min Lin, Guang-Xun Rui, Gang |
author_facet | Xu, Wen-Bin Kotheeranurak, Vit Zhang, Huang-Lin Chen, Zhang-Xin Wu, Hua-Jian Chen, Chien-Min Lin, Guang-Xun Rui, Gang |
author_sort | Xu, Wen-Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: To estimate the clinical outcomes of uniportal and biportal full-endoscopic spine surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (LDD), and to provide the latest evidence for clinical selection. Materials and Methods: Relevant literatures published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang Database before 21 November 2021 were searched systematically. Two researchers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Review Manager software (version 5.4; The Cochrane Collaboration). Results: A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 198 patients in a uniportal endoscopy group and 185 patients in a biportal endoscopy group. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that the biportal endoscopy group experienced less intraoperative estimated blood loss (WMD = −2.54, 95%CI [−4.48, −0.60], p = 0.01), while the uniportal endoscopy group displayed significantly better recovery results in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments of the back within 3 days of surgery (WMD = 0.69, 95%CI [0.02, 1.37], p = 0.04). However, no significant differences in operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rates, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (within 3 months), ODI (last follow-up), VAS for back (within 3 months), VAS for back (last follow-up), and VAS for leg (within 3 days, within 3 months, last follow-up) were identified between the two groups. Conclusions: According to our meta-analysis, patients who underwent the uniportal endoscopic procedure had more significant early postoperative back pain relief than those who underwent the biportal endoscopic procedure. Nevertheless, both surgical techniques are safe and effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9698221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96982212022-11-26 Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis Xu, Wen-Bin Kotheeranurak, Vit Zhang, Huang-Lin Chen, Zhang-Xin Wu, Hua-Jian Chen, Chien-Min Lin, Guang-Xun Rui, Gang Medicina (Kaunas) Systematic Review Background and Objectives: To estimate the clinical outcomes of uniportal and biportal full-endoscopic spine surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (LDD), and to provide the latest evidence for clinical selection. Materials and Methods: Relevant literatures published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang Database before 21 November 2021 were searched systematically. Two researchers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Review Manager software (version 5.4; The Cochrane Collaboration). Results: A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 198 patients in a uniportal endoscopy group and 185 patients in a biportal endoscopy group. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that the biportal endoscopy group experienced less intraoperative estimated blood loss (WMD = −2.54, 95%CI [−4.48, −0.60], p = 0.01), while the uniportal endoscopy group displayed significantly better recovery results in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments of the back within 3 days of surgery (WMD = 0.69, 95%CI [0.02, 1.37], p = 0.04). However, no significant differences in operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rates, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (within 3 months), ODI (last follow-up), VAS for back (within 3 months), VAS for back (last follow-up), and VAS for leg (within 3 days, within 3 months, last follow-up) were identified between the two groups. Conclusions: According to our meta-analysis, patients who underwent the uniportal endoscopic procedure had more significant early postoperative back pain relief than those who underwent the biportal endoscopic procedure. Nevertheless, both surgical techniques are safe and effective. MDPI 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9698221/ /pubmed/36363480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111523 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Xu, Wen-Bin Kotheeranurak, Vit Zhang, Huang-Lin Chen, Zhang-Xin Wu, Hua-Jian Chen, Chien-Min Lin, Guang-Xun Rui, Gang Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis |
title | Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | is biportal endoscopic spine surgery more advantageous than uniportal for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease? a meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuwenbin isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis AT kotheeranurakvit isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis AT zhanghuanglin isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis AT chenzhangxin isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis AT wuhuajian isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis AT chenchienmin isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis AT linguangxun isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis AT ruigang isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis |