Cargando…

Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: To estimate the clinical outcomes of uniportal and biportal full-endoscopic spine surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (LDD), and to provide the latest evidence for clinical selection. Materials and Methods: Relevant literatures published in PubMed, Web...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Wen-Bin, Kotheeranurak, Vit, Zhang, Huang-Lin, Chen, Zhang-Xin, Wu, Hua-Jian, Chen, Chien-Min, Lin, Guang-Xun, Rui, Gang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111523
_version_ 1784838762725900288
author Xu, Wen-Bin
Kotheeranurak, Vit
Zhang, Huang-Lin
Chen, Zhang-Xin
Wu, Hua-Jian
Chen, Chien-Min
Lin, Guang-Xun
Rui, Gang
author_facet Xu, Wen-Bin
Kotheeranurak, Vit
Zhang, Huang-Lin
Chen, Zhang-Xin
Wu, Hua-Jian
Chen, Chien-Min
Lin, Guang-Xun
Rui, Gang
author_sort Xu, Wen-Bin
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: To estimate the clinical outcomes of uniportal and biportal full-endoscopic spine surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (LDD), and to provide the latest evidence for clinical selection. Materials and Methods: Relevant literatures published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang Database before 21 November 2021 were searched systematically. Two researchers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Review Manager software (version 5.4; The Cochrane Collaboration). Results: A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 198 patients in a uniportal endoscopy group and 185 patients in a biportal endoscopy group. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that the biportal endoscopy group experienced less intraoperative estimated blood loss (WMD = −2.54, 95%CI [−4.48, −0.60], p = 0.01), while the uniportal endoscopy group displayed significantly better recovery results in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments of the back within 3 days of surgery (WMD = 0.69, 95%CI [0.02, 1.37], p = 0.04). However, no significant differences in operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rates, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (within 3 months), ODI (last follow-up), VAS for back (within 3 months), VAS for back (last follow-up), and VAS for leg (within 3 days, within 3 months, last follow-up) were identified between the two groups. Conclusions: According to our meta-analysis, patients who underwent the uniportal endoscopic procedure had more significant early postoperative back pain relief than those who underwent the biportal endoscopic procedure. Nevertheless, both surgical techniques are safe and effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9698221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96982212022-11-26 Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis Xu, Wen-Bin Kotheeranurak, Vit Zhang, Huang-Lin Chen, Zhang-Xin Wu, Hua-Jian Chen, Chien-Min Lin, Guang-Xun Rui, Gang Medicina (Kaunas) Systematic Review Background and Objectives: To estimate the clinical outcomes of uniportal and biportal full-endoscopic spine surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (LDD), and to provide the latest evidence for clinical selection. Materials and Methods: Relevant literatures published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang Database before 21 November 2021 were searched systematically. Two researchers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Review Manager software (version 5.4; The Cochrane Collaboration). Results: A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 198 patients in a uniportal endoscopy group and 185 patients in a biportal endoscopy group. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that the biportal endoscopy group experienced less intraoperative estimated blood loss (WMD = −2.54, 95%CI [−4.48, −0.60], p = 0.01), while the uniportal endoscopy group displayed significantly better recovery results in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments of the back within 3 days of surgery (WMD = 0.69, 95%CI [0.02, 1.37], p = 0.04). However, no significant differences in operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rates, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (within 3 months), ODI (last follow-up), VAS for back (within 3 months), VAS for back (last follow-up), and VAS for leg (within 3 days, within 3 months, last follow-up) were identified between the two groups. Conclusions: According to our meta-analysis, patients who underwent the uniportal endoscopic procedure had more significant early postoperative back pain relief than those who underwent the biportal endoscopic procedure. Nevertheless, both surgical techniques are safe and effective. MDPI 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9698221/ /pubmed/36363480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111523 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Xu, Wen-Bin
Kotheeranurak, Vit
Zhang, Huang-Lin
Chen, Zhang-Xin
Wu, Hua-Jian
Chen, Chien-Min
Lin, Guang-Xun
Rui, Gang
Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis
title Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis
title_full Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis
title_short Is Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery More Advantageous Than Uniportal for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease? A Meta-Analysis
title_sort is biportal endoscopic spine surgery more advantageous than uniportal for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease? a meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111523
work_keys_str_mv AT xuwenbin isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis
AT kotheeranurakvit isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis
AT zhanghuanglin isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis
AT chenzhangxin isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis
AT wuhuajian isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis
AT chenchienmin isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis
AT linguangxun isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis
AT ruigang isbiportalendoscopicspinesurgerymoreadvantageousthanuniportalforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseaseametaanalysis