Cargando…
Seroprevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Rift Valley Fever in Livestock from Three Ecological Zones of Malawi
The epidemiology of Rift Valley fever (RVF) is poorly understood in Malawi. Here, a cross-sectional study was conducted (March–June 2020) to investigate the seroprevalence and potential risk factors of RVF virus (RVFV) in cattle, goats, and sheep in three ecological zones of Malawi. A total of 1523...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36422600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111349 |
Sumario: | The epidemiology of Rift Valley fever (RVF) is poorly understood in Malawi. Here, a cross-sectional study was conducted (March–June 2020) to investigate the seroprevalence and potential risk factors of RVF virus (RVFV) in cattle, goats, and sheep in three ecological zones of Malawi. A total of 1523 serum samples were tested for anti-RVFV IgG and IgM antibodies by ELISA. Additionally, a questionnaire survey was used to assess potential RVF risk factors. The overall seroprevalence was 17.14% (261/1523; 95% CI = 15.33–19.11) for individual livestock and 33.24% (120/361; 95% CI = 28.18–38.11) for the livestock herd. Seroprevalence was significantly high in sheep (25.68%, 95% CI = 19.31–33.26) compared with cattle (21.35%, 95% CI = 18.74–24.22) and goats (7.72%, 95% CI = 5.72–10.34), (p = 0.047). At the individual livestock level, the risk was elevated in female livestock (OR: 1.74, 95% CI = 1.08–12.82) (p = 0.016), while at the herd level, areas receiving approximately 1001–1500 mm of rainfall (OR: 2.47, 95% CI = 1.14–5.37) (p = 0.022), areas of rainfall amount greater than approximately 1600 mm (OR: 2.239, 95% CI = 1.07–8.82) (p = 0.023), and mixed species herds (OR: 10.410, 95% CI = 3.04–35.59) (p = 0.001), were significant risk factors. The detection of IgM antibodies confirmed active circulation of RVFV in Malawi. Therefore, monitoring of RVF in animals, humans, and vectors using a “One Health” approach, along with community sensitization among the high-risk populations, could help mitigate the threat posed by this zoonotic disease in Malawi. |
---|