Cargando…

Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows

Purpose: To assess the qualitative relationship between liquid biopsy and conventional tissue biopsy. As a secondary target, we evaluated the relationship between the liquid biopsy results and the T stage, N stage, M stage, and compared to grading. Methods: The Local Ethics Committee of the “Univers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montella, Marco, Ciani, Giovanni, Granata, Vincenza, Fusco, Roberta, Grassi, Francesca, Ronchi, Andrea, Cozzolino, Immacolata, Franco, Renato, Zito Marino, Federica, Urraro, Fabrizio, Monti, Riccardo, Sirica, Roberto, Savarese, Giovanni, Chianese, Ugo, Nebbioso, Angela, Altucci, Lucia, Vietri, Maria Teresa, Nardone, Valerio, Reginelli, Alfonso, Grassi, Roberta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36422072
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111896
_version_ 1784838798809497600
author Montella, Marco
Ciani, Giovanni
Granata, Vincenza
Fusco, Roberta
Grassi, Francesca
Ronchi, Andrea
Cozzolino, Immacolata
Franco, Renato
Zito Marino, Federica
Urraro, Fabrizio
Monti, Riccardo
Sirica, Roberto
Savarese, Giovanni
Chianese, Ugo
Nebbioso, Angela
Altucci, Lucia
Vietri, Maria Teresa
Nardone, Valerio
Reginelli, Alfonso
Grassi, Roberta
author_facet Montella, Marco
Ciani, Giovanni
Granata, Vincenza
Fusco, Roberta
Grassi, Francesca
Ronchi, Andrea
Cozzolino, Immacolata
Franco, Renato
Zito Marino, Federica
Urraro, Fabrizio
Monti, Riccardo
Sirica, Roberto
Savarese, Giovanni
Chianese, Ugo
Nebbioso, Angela
Altucci, Lucia
Vietri, Maria Teresa
Nardone, Valerio
Reginelli, Alfonso
Grassi, Roberta
author_sort Montella, Marco
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To assess the qualitative relationship between liquid biopsy and conventional tissue biopsy. As a secondary target, we evaluated the relationship between the liquid biopsy results and the T stage, N stage, M stage, and compared to grading. Methods: The Local Ethics Committee of the “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, with the internal resolution number 24997/2020 of 12.11.2020, approved this spontaneous prospective study. According to the approved protocol, patients with lung cancer who underwent Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC), CT-guided biopsy, and liquid biopsy were enrolled. A Yates chi-square test was employed to analyze differences in percentage values of categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using the Matlab Statistic Toolbox (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Results: When a genetic mutation is present on the pathological examination, this was also detected on the liquid biopsy. ROS1 and PDL1 mutations were found in 2/29 patients, while EGFR Exon 21 was identified in a single patient. At liquid biopsy, 26 mutations were identified in the analyzed samples. The mutations with the highest prevalence rate in the study populations were: ALK (Ile1461Val), found in 28/29 patients (96.6%), EML4 (Lys398Arg), identified in 16/29 (55.2%) patients, ALK (Asp1529Glu), found in 14/29 (48.3%) patients, EGFR (Arg521Lys), found in 12/29 (41.4%) patients, ROS (Lys2228Gln), identified in 11/29 (37.9%) patients, ROS (Arg167Gln) and ROS (Ser2229Cys), identified in 10/29 (34.5%) patients, ALK (Lys1491Arg) and PIK3CA (Ile391Met), identified in 8/29 (27.6%) patients, ROS (Thr145Pro), identified in 6/29 (20.7%) patients, and ROS (Ser1109Leu), identified in 4/29 (13.8%) patients. No statistically significant differences can be observed in the mutation rate between the adenocarcinoma population and the squamous carcinoma population (p > 0.05, Yates chi-square test). Conclusions: We showed that, when a genetic mutation was detected in pathological examination, this was always detected by liquid biopsy, demonstrating a very high concordance rate of genomic testing between tissues and their corresponding mutations obtained by liquid biopsy, without cases of false-negative results. In addition, in our study, liquid biopsy highlighted 26 mutations, with the prevalence of ALK mutation in 96.6% of patients, supporting the idea that this approach could be an effective tool in cases with insufficient tumor tissue specimens or in cases where tissue specimens are not obtainable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9698369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96983692022-11-26 Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows Montella, Marco Ciani, Giovanni Granata, Vincenza Fusco, Roberta Grassi, Francesca Ronchi, Andrea Cozzolino, Immacolata Franco, Renato Zito Marino, Federica Urraro, Fabrizio Monti, Riccardo Sirica, Roberto Savarese, Giovanni Chianese, Ugo Nebbioso, Angela Altucci, Lucia Vietri, Maria Teresa Nardone, Valerio Reginelli, Alfonso Grassi, Roberta J Pers Med Article Purpose: To assess the qualitative relationship between liquid biopsy and conventional tissue biopsy. As a secondary target, we evaluated the relationship between the liquid biopsy results and the T stage, N stage, M stage, and compared to grading. Methods: The Local Ethics Committee of the “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, with the internal resolution number 24997/2020 of 12.11.2020, approved this spontaneous prospective study. According to the approved protocol, patients with lung cancer who underwent Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC), CT-guided biopsy, and liquid biopsy were enrolled. A Yates chi-square test was employed to analyze differences in percentage values of categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using the Matlab Statistic Toolbox (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Results: When a genetic mutation is present on the pathological examination, this was also detected on the liquid biopsy. ROS1 and PDL1 mutations were found in 2/29 patients, while EGFR Exon 21 was identified in a single patient. At liquid biopsy, 26 mutations were identified in the analyzed samples. The mutations with the highest prevalence rate in the study populations were: ALK (Ile1461Val), found in 28/29 patients (96.6%), EML4 (Lys398Arg), identified in 16/29 (55.2%) patients, ALK (Asp1529Glu), found in 14/29 (48.3%) patients, EGFR (Arg521Lys), found in 12/29 (41.4%) patients, ROS (Lys2228Gln), identified in 11/29 (37.9%) patients, ROS (Arg167Gln) and ROS (Ser2229Cys), identified in 10/29 (34.5%) patients, ALK (Lys1491Arg) and PIK3CA (Ile391Met), identified in 8/29 (27.6%) patients, ROS (Thr145Pro), identified in 6/29 (20.7%) patients, and ROS (Ser1109Leu), identified in 4/29 (13.8%) patients. No statistically significant differences can be observed in the mutation rate between the adenocarcinoma population and the squamous carcinoma population (p > 0.05, Yates chi-square test). Conclusions: We showed that, when a genetic mutation was detected in pathological examination, this was always detected by liquid biopsy, demonstrating a very high concordance rate of genomic testing between tissues and their corresponding mutations obtained by liquid biopsy, without cases of false-negative results. In addition, in our study, liquid biopsy highlighted 26 mutations, with the prevalence of ALK mutation in 96.6% of patients, supporting the idea that this approach could be an effective tool in cases with insufficient tumor tissue specimens or in cases where tissue specimens are not obtainable. MDPI 2022-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9698369/ /pubmed/36422072 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111896 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Montella, Marco
Ciani, Giovanni
Granata, Vincenza
Fusco, Roberta
Grassi, Francesca
Ronchi, Andrea
Cozzolino, Immacolata
Franco, Renato
Zito Marino, Federica
Urraro, Fabrizio
Monti, Riccardo
Sirica, Roberto
Savarese, Giovanni
Chianese, Ugo
Nebbioso, Angela
Altucci, Lucia
Vietri, Maria Teresa
Nardone, Valerio
Reginelli, Alfonso
Grassi, Roberta
Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows
title Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows
title_full Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows
title_fullStr Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows
title_short Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows
title_sort preliminary experience of liquid biopsy in lung cancer compared to conventional assessment: light and shadows
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36422072
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111896
work_keys_str_mv AT montellamarco preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT cianigiovanni preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT granatavincenza preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT fuscoroberta preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT grassifrancesca preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT ronchiandrea preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT cozzolinoimmacolata preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT francorenato preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT zitomarinofederica preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT urrarofabrizio preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT montiriccardo preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT siricaroberto preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT savaresegiovanni preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT chianeseugo preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT nebbiosoangela preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT altuccilucia preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT vietrimariateresa preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT nardonevalerio preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT reginellialfonso preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows
AT grassiroberta preliminaryexperienceofliquidbiopsyinlungcancercomparedtoconventionalassessmentlightandshadows