Cargando…

Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types

In the present study, the in vitro biocompatibility and cell response to two commonly used orthodontic bonding materials of different types, one self-curing and one light-curing, were examined and compared in indirect and direct cell culture systems. The study was conducted on fibroblasts and macrop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janošević, Predrag, Stojanović, Sanja, Stojanović, Ivana, Janošević, Mirjana, Najman, Stevo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433124
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14224998
_version_ 1784838833319182336
author Janošević, Predrag
Stojanović, Sanja
Stojanović, Ivana
Janošević, Mirjana
Najman, Stevo
author_facet Janošević, Predrag
Stojanović, Sanja
Stojanović, Ivana
Janošević, Mirjana
Najman, Stevo
author_sort Janošević, Predrag
collection PubMed
description In the present study, the in vitro biocompatibility and cell response to two commonly used orthodontic bonding materials of different types, one self-curing and one light-curing, were examined and compared in indirect and direct cell culture systems. The study was conducted on fibroblasts and macrophages as in vitro models to study the biocompatibility of dental materials. Differences were found between the light- and self-curing material in cytotoxicity and effects on fibroblasts’ proliferation in indirect cell culture systems as well as in macrophages response in vitro in both direct and indirect cell culture systems. Based on the obtained results, we can conclude that the self-curing material is generally more cytotoxic for fibroblasts compared to the light-curing, while macrophages’ response to these materials was dependent on the macrophages’ state and differed between the examined materials. This indicates that more attention should be paid when choosing and applying these materials in practice due to their toxicity to cells. Prior to their use, all aspects should be considered regarding the patient’s conditions, associated problems, microenvironment in the oral cavity, etc. Further studies on in vivo models should be conducted to fully understand the potential long-term effects of the use of mentioned materials in orthodontics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9698495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96984952022-11-26 Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types Janošević, Predrag Stojanović, Sanja Stojanović, Ivana Janošević, Mirjana Najman, Stevo Polymers (Basel) Article In the present study, the in vitro biocompatibility and cell response to two commonly used orthodontic bonding materials of different types, one self-curing and one light-curing, were examined and compared in indirect and direct cell culture systems. The study was conducted on fibroblasts and macrophages as in vitro models to study the biocompatibility of dental materials. Differences were found between the light- and self-curing material in cytotoxicity and effects on fibroblasts’ proliferation in indirect cell culture systems as well as in macrophages response in vitro in both direct and indirect cell culture systems. Based on the obtained results, we can conclude that the self-curing material is generally more cytotoxic for fibroblasts compared to the light-curing, while macrophages’ response to these materials was dependent on the macrophages’ state and differed between the examined materials. This indicates that more attention should be paid when choosing and applying these materials in practice due to their toxicity to cells. Prior to their use, all aspects should be considered regarding the patient’s conditions, associated problems, microenvironment in the oral cavity, etc. Further studies on in vivo models should be conducted to fully understand the potential long-term effects of the use of mentioned materials in orthodontics. MDPI 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9698495/ /pubmed/36433124 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14224998 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Janošević, Predrag
Stojanović, Sanja
Stojanović, Ivana
Janošević, Mirjana
Najman, Stevo
Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types
title Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types
title_full Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types
title_fullStr Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types
title_full_unstemmed Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types
title_short Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types
title_sort comparative in vitro biocompatibility study of the two orthodontic bonding materials of different types
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433124
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14224998
work_keys_str_mv AT janosevicpredrag comparativeinvitrobiocompatibilitystudyofthetwoorthodonticbondingmaterialsofdifferenttypes
AT stojanovicsanja comparativeinvitrobiocompatibilitystudyofthetwoorthodonticbondingmaterialsofdifferenttypes
AT stojanovicivana comparativeinvitrobiocompatibilitystudyofthetwoorthodonticbondingmaterialsofdifferenttypes
AT janosevicmirjana comparativeinvitrobiocompatibilitystudyofthetwoorthodonticbondingmaterialsofdifferenttypes
AT najmanstevo comparativeinvitrobiocompatibilitystudyofthetwoorthodonticbondingmaterialsofdifferenttypes