Cargando…

The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Background and Objectives: The effect of individualized hemodynamic management on the intraoperative use of fluids and other hemodynamic interventions in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate how the use of individualized hemodynamic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kukralova, Lucie, Dostalova, Vlasta, Cihlo, Miroslav, Kraus, Jaroslav, Dostal, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36422222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111683
_version_ 1784838844512731136
author Kukralova, Lucie
Dostalova, Vlasta
Cihlo, Miroslav
Kraus, Jaroslav
Dostal, Pavel
author_facet Kukralova, Lucie
Dostalova, Vlasta
Cihlo, Miroslav
Kraus, Jaroslav
Dostal, Pavel
author_sort Kukralova, Lucie
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: The effect of individualized hemodynamic management on the intraoperative use of fluids and other hemodynamic interventions in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate how the use of individualized hemodynamic management based on extended continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring modifies intraoperative hemodynamic interventions compared to conventional hemodynamic monitoring with intermittent non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Methods: Fifty adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–III) who underwent spinal procedures in the prone position and were then managed with a restrictive fluid strategy were prospectively randomized into intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, individualized hemodynamic management followed a goal-directed protocol based on continuously non-invasively measured blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume variation. In the control group, patients were monitored using intermittent non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, and the choice of hemodynamic intervention was left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Results: In the intervention group, more hypotensive episodes (3 (2–4) vs. 1 (0–2), p = 0.0001), higher intraoperative dose of ephedrine (0 (0–10) vs. 0 (0–0) mg, p = 0.0008), and more positive fluid balance (680 (510–937) vs. 270 (196–377) ml, p < 0.0001) were recorded. Intraoperative norepinephrine dose and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Individualized hemodynamic management based on data from extended non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring significantly modified intraoperative hemodynamic management and was associated with a higher number of hemodynamic interventions and a more positive fluid balance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9698539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96985392022-11-26 The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial Kukralova, Lucie Dostalova, Vlasta Cihlo, Miroslav Kraus, Jaroslav Dostal, Pavel Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: The effect of individualized hemodynamic management on the intraoperative use of fluids and other hemodynamic interventions in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate how the use of individualized hemodynamic management based on extended continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring modifies intraoperative hemodynamic interventions compared to conventional hemodynamic monitoring with intermittent non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Methods: Fifty adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–III) who underwent spinal procedures in the prone position and were then managed with a restrictive fluid strategy were prospectively randomized into intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, individualized hemodynamic management followed a goal-directed protocol based on continuously non-invasively measured blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume variation. In the control group, patients were monitored using intermittent non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, and the choice of hemodynamic intervention was left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Results: In the intervention group, more hypotensive episodes (3 (2–4) vs. 1 (0–2), p = 0.0001), higher intraoperative dose of ephedrine (0 (0–10) vs. 0 (0–0) mg, p = 0.0008), and more positive fluid balance (680 (510–937) vs. 270 (196–377) ml, p < 0.0001) were recorded. Intraoperative norepinephrine dose and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Individualized hemodynamic management based on data from extended non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring significantly modified intraoperative hemodynamic management and was associated with a higher number of hemodynamic interventions and a more positive fluid balance. MDPI 2022-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9698539/ /pubmed/36422222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111683 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kukralova, Lucie
Dostalova, Vlasta
Cihlo, Miroslav
Kraus, Jaroslav
Dostal, Pavel
The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_fullStr The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_short The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_sort impact of individualized hemodynamic management on intraoperative fluid balance and hemodynamic interventions during spine surgery in the prone position: a prospective randomized trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36422222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111683
work_keys_str_mv AT kukralovalucie theimpactofindividualizedhemodynamicmanagementonintraoperativefluidbalanceandhemodynamicinterventionsduringspinesurgeryinthepronepositionaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT dostalovavlasta theimpactofindividualizedhemodynamicmanagementonintraoperativefluidbalanceandhemodynamicinterventionsduringspinesurgeryinthepronepositionaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT cihlomiroslav theimpactofindividualizedhemodynamicmanagementonintraoperativefluidbalanceandhemodynamicinterventionsduringspinesurgeryinthepronepositionaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT krausjaroslav theimpactofindividualizedhemodynamicmanagementonintraoperativefluidbalanceandhemodynamicinterventionsduringspinesurgeryinthepronepositionaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT dostalpavel theimpactofindividualizedhemodynamicmanagementonintraoperativefluidbalanceandhemodynamicinterventionsduringspinesurgeryinthepronepositionaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT kukralovalucie impactofindividualizedhemodynamicmanagementonintraoperativefluidbalanceandhemodynamicinterventionsduringspinesurgeryinthepronepositionaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT dostalovavlasta impactofindividualizedhemodynamicmanagementonintraoperativefluidbalanceandhemodynamicinterventionsduringspinesurgeryinthepronepositionaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT cihlomiroslav impactofindividualizedhemodynamicmanagementonintraoperativefluidbalanceandhemodynamicinterventionsduringspinesurgeryinthepronepositionaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT krausjaroslav impactofindividualizedhemodynamicmanagementonintraoperativefluidbalanceandhemodynamicinterventionsduringspinesurgeryinthepronepositionaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT dostalpavel impactofindividualizedhemodynamicmanagementonintraoperativefluidbalanceandhemodynamicinterventionsduringspinesurgeryinthepronepositionaprospectiverandomizedtrial