Cargando…

The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse

Background: this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal patch plastron (VPP) associated to anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF-A) with SSLF-A associated or not to the anterior colporrhaphy (AC) for cystocele treatment. Methods: single-center retrospective study in women w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruffolo, Alessandro Ferdinando, Lambert, Benjamin, Lallemant, Marine, Candiani, Massimo, Salvatore, Stefano, Cosson, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36431162
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226684
_version_ 1784839028526284800
author Ruffolo, Alessandro Ferdinando
Lambert, Benjamin
Lallemant, Marine
Candiani, Massimo
Salvatore, Stefano
Cosson, Michel
author_facet Ruffolo, Alessandro Ferdinando
Lambert, Benjamin
Lallemant, Marine
Candiani, Massimo
Salvatore, Stefano
Cosson, Michel
author_sort Ruffolo, Alessandro Ferdinando
collection PubMed
description Background: this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal patch plastron (VPP) associated to anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF-A) with SSLF-A associated or not to the anterior colporrhaphy (AC) for cystocele treatment. Methods: single-center retrospective study in women with cystocele ≥ III stage submitted to surgery. The primary outcome was to compare objective and subjective cystocele relapse and reoperation rate at follow-up > 6 months. The secondary outcome was to describe peri- and postoperative complications and risk factors for cystocele objective relapse. Results: 75 women were submitted to SSLF-A and 61 women to VPP. VPP objective and subjective relapse (6.5%, 4/61 and 1.1%, 1/61) were lower than SSLF-A (26.7%, 20/75 and 20%, 15/75; p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). SSLF-A had a higher reintervention rate, but not significantly (6.6%, 5/75 vs. 0%, 0/61; p = 0.06). Previous hysterectomy was a risk factor (HR 4; 1.3–12.1) while VPP was protective factor (HR 0.2; 0.1–0.9) for cystocele anatomical relapse. Postoperative buttock pain was more prevalent in VPP (57.4%, 35/75 vs. 34.7%, 26/61; p = 0.01). Conclusions: VPP is effective and safe for advanced cystocele treatment, with lower objective and subjective relapse rates in comparison to isolated SSLF-A or associated with the AC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9699260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96992602022-11-26 The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Ruffolo, Alessandro Ferdinando Lambert, Benjamin Lallemant, Marine Candiani, Massimo Salvatore, Stefano Cosson, Michel J Clin Med Article Background: this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal patch plastron (VPP) associated to anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF-A) with SSLF-A associated or not to the anterior colporrhaphy (AC) for cystocele treatment. Methods: single-center retrospective study in women with cystocele ≥ III stage submitted to surgery. The primary outcome was to compare objective and subjective cystocele relapse and reoperation rate at follow-up > 6 months. The secondary outcome was to describe peri- and postoperative complications and risk factors for cystocele objective relapse. Results: 75 women were submitted to SSLF-A and 61 women to VPP. VPP objective and subjective relapse (6.5%, 4/61 and 1.1%, 1/61) were lower than SSLF-A (26.7%, 20/75 and 20%, 15/75; p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). SSLF-A had a higher reintervention rate, but not significantly (6.6%, 5/75 vs. 0%, 0/61; p = 0.06). Previous hysterectomy was a risk factor (HR 4; 1.3–12.1) while VPP was protective factor (HR 0.2; 0.1–0.9) for cystocele anatomical relapse. Postoperative buttock pain was more prevalent in VPP (57.4%, 35/75 vs. 34.7%, 26/61; p = 0.01). Conclusions: VPP is effective and safe for advanced cystocele treatment, with lower objective and subjective relapse rates in comparison to isolated SSLF-A or associated with the AC. MDPI 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9699260/ /pubmed/36431162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226684 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ruffolo, Alessandro Ferdinando
Lambert, Benjamin
Lallemant, Marine
Candiani, Massimo
Salvatore, Stefano
Cosson, Michel
The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
title The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
title_full The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
title_fullStr The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
title_full_unstemmed The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
title_short The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
title_sort vaginal patch plastron associated to the anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36431162
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226684
work_keys_str_mv AT ruffoloalessandroferdinando thevaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT lambertbenjamin thevaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT lallemantmarine thevaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT candianimassimo thevaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT salvatorestefano thevaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT cossonmichel thevaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT ruffoloalessandroferdinando vaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT lambertbenjamin vaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT lallemantmarine vaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT candianimassimo vaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT salvatorestefano vaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse
AT cossonmichel vaginalpatchplastronassociatedtotheanteriorsacrospinousligamentfixationforthetreatmentofadvancedanteriorvaginalwallprolapse