Cargando…
Markerless motion capture: What clinician-scientists need to know right now
Markerless motion capture (mocap) could be the future of motion analysis. The purpose of this report was to describe our team of clinicians and scientists’ exploration of markerless mocap (Theia 3D) and share data for others to explore (link: https://osf.io/6vh7z/?view_only=c0e00984e94a48f28c8d987a2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsampl.2022.100001 |
_version_ | 1784839042312962048 |
---|---|
author | Ito, Naoaki Sigurðsson, Haraldur B. Seymore, Kayla D. Arhos, Elanna K. Buchanan, Thomas S. Snyder-Mackler, Lynn Silbernagel, Karin Grävare |
author_facet | Ito, Naoaki Sigurðsson, Haraldur B. Seymore, Kayla D. Arhos, Elanna K. Buchanan, Thomas S. Snyder-Mackler, Lynn Silbernagel, Karin Grävare |
author_sort | Ito, Naoaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Markerless motion capture (mocap) could be the future of motion analysis. The purpose of this report was to describe our team of clinicians and scientists’ exploration of markerless mocap (Theia 3D) and share data for others to explore (link: https://osf.io/6vh7z/?view_only=c0e00984e94a48f28c8d987a2127339d). Simultaneous mocap was performed using markerless and marker-based systems for walking, squatting, and forward hopping. Segment lengths were more variable between trials using markerless mocap compared to marker-based mocap. Sagittal plane angles were most comparable between systems at the knee joint followed by the ankle and hip. Frontal and transverse plane angles were not comparable between systems. The data collection experience using markerless mocap was simpler, faster, and user friendly. The ease of collection was in part offset by the added data transfer and processing times, and the lack of troubleshooting flexibility. If used selectively with proper understanding of limitations, markerless mocap can be exciting technology to advance the field of motion analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9699317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96993172022-11-25 Markerless motion capture: What clinician-scientists need to know right now Ito, Naoaki Sigurðsson, Haraldur B. Seymore, Kayla D. Arhos, Elanna K. Buchanan, Thomas S. Snyder-Mackler, Lynn Silbernagel, Karin Grävare JSAMS Plus Article Markerless motion capture (mocap) could be the future of motion analysis. The purpose of this report was to describe our team of clinicians and scientists’ exploration of markerless mocap (Theia 3D) and share data for others to explore (link: https://osf.io/6vh7z/?view_only=c0e00984e94a48f28c8d987a2127339d). Simultaneous mocap was performed using markerless and marker-based systems for walking, squatting, and forward hopping. Segment lengths were more variable between trials using markerless mocap compared to marker-based mocap. Sagittal plane angles were most comparable between systems at the knee joint followed by the ankle and hip. Frontal and transverse plane angles were not comparable between systems. The data collection experience using markerless mocap was simpler, faster, and user friendly. The ease of collection was in part offset by the added data transfer and processing times, and the lack of troubleshooting flexibility. If used selectively with proper understanding of limitations, markerless mocap can be exciting technology to advance the field of motion analysis. 2022-10 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9699317/ /pubmed/36438718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsampl.2022.100001 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Ito, Naoaki Sigurðsson, Haraldur B. Seymore, Kayla D. Arhos, Elanna K. Buchanan, Thomas S. Snyder-Mackler, Lynn Silbernagel, Karin Grävare Markerless motion capture: What clinician-scientists need to know right now |
title | Markerless motion capture: What clinician-scientists need to know right now |
title_full | Markerless motion capture: What clinician-scientists need to know right now |
title_fullStr | Markerless motion capture: What clinician-scientists need to know right now |
title_full_unstemmed | Markerless motion capture: What clinician-scientists need to know right now |
title_short | Markerless motion capture: What clinician-scientists need to know right now |
title_sort | markerless motion capture: what clinician-scientists need to know right now |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsampl.2022.100001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT itonaoaki markerlessmotioncapturewhatclinicianscientistsneedtoknowrightnow AT sigurðssonharaldurb markerlessmotioncapturewhatclinicianscientistsneedtoknowrightnow AT seymorekaylad markerlessmotioncapturewhatclinicianscientistsneedtoknowrightnow AT arhoselannak markerlessmotioncapturewhatclinicianscientistsneedtoknowrightnow AT buchananthomass markerlessmotioncapturewhatclinicianscientistsneedtoknowrightnow AT snydermacklerlynn markerlessmotioncapturewhatclinicianscientistsneedtoknowrightnow AT silbernagelkaringravare markerlessmotioncapturewhatclinicianscientistsneedtoknowrightnow |