Cargando…

Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasingly frequent disorder that is likely to become the third leading cause of morbidity worldwide. It significantly degrades the quality of life of patients affected and poses a significant financial burden to the healthcare systems providing t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barata, Paula Irina, Crisan, Alexandru Florian, Maritescu, Adelina, Negrean, Rodica Anamaria, Rosca, Ovidiu, Bratosin, Felix, Citu, Cosmin, Oancea, Cristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36573730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111764
_version_ 1784839112666120192
author Barata, Paula Irina
Crisan, Alexandru Florian
Maritescu, Adelina
Negrean, Rodica Anamaria
Rosca, Ovidiu
Bratosin, Felix
Citu, Cosmin
Oancea, Cristian
author_facet Barata, Paula Irina
Crisan, Alexandru Florian
Maritescu, Adelina
Negrean, Rodica Anamaria
Rosca, Ovidiu
Bratosin, Felix
Citu, Cosmin
Oancea, Cristian
author_sort Barata, Paula Irina
collection PubMed
description Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasingly frequent disorder that is likely to become the third leading cause of morbidity worldwide. It significantly degrades the quality of life of patients affected and poses a significant financial burden to the healthcare systems providing treatment and rehabilitation. Consequently, our study’s purpose was to compare conventional inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) with virtual (online) PR using a mobile phone application. During a three-month period, two groups of patients followed the research protocol by participating in a pulmonary rehabilitation program administered and supervised by a physical therapist five times per week. A number of respiratory variables were examined before and after the test. At the end of the study period, a total of 72 patients completed the rehabilitation in the inpatient group, respectively 58 in the online group. It was observed that post-test comparison between patients undergoing the traditional and online rehabilitation methods did not show any significant differences. However, the calculated mean differences between pre-test and post-test results were significantly higher in favor of the virtual method. The most significant variations were encountered in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (6.6% vs. 8.5%, p-value < 0.001), 6-min walking test (6MWT) (6.7% vs. 9.4%, p-value < 0.001), and COPD assessment test (CAT) values (4.8 vs. 6.2, p-value < 0.001), respectively. However, the maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) variation was significantly higher in patients undergoing the traditional rehabilitation method, from an average of 4.1% to 3.2% (p-value < 0.001). In this preliminary study, the online pulmonary rehabilitation program proved non-inferiority to the traditional method, with significantly better results in several measurements. Additional studies using larger cohorts of patients and longer exposure to the online rehabilitation program are required to validate these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9699594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96995942022-11-26 Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD Barata, Paula Irina Crisan, Alexandru Florian Maritescu, Adelina Negrean, Rodica Anamaria Rosca, Ovidiu Bratosin, Felix Citu, Cosmin Oancea, Cristian J Pers Med Article Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasingly frequent disorder that is likely to become the third leading cause of morbidity worldwide. It significantly degrades the quality of life of patients affected and poses a significant financial burden to the healthcare systems providing treatment and rehabilitation. Consequently, our study’s purpose was to compare conventional inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) with virtual (online) PR using a mobile phone application. During a three-month period, two groups of patients followed the research protocol by participating in a pulmonary rehabilitation program administered and supervised by a physical therapist five times per week. A number of respiratory variables were examined before and after the test. At the end of the study period, a total of 72 patients completed the rehabilitation in the inpatient group, respectively 58 in the online group. It was observed that post-test comparison between patients undergoing the traditional and online rehabilitation methods did not show any significant differences. However, the calculated mean differences between pre-test and post-test results were significantly higher in favor of the virtual method. The most significant variations were encountered in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (6.6% vs. 8.5%, p-value < 0.001), 6-min walking test (6MWT) (6.7% vs. 9.4%, p-value < 0.001), and COPD assessment test (CAT) values (4.8 vs. 6.2, p-value < 0.001), respectively. However, the maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) variation was significantly higher in patients undergoing the traditional rehabilitation method, from an average of 4.1% to 3.2% (p-value < 0.001). In this preliminary study, the online pulmonary rehabilitation program proved non-inferiority to the traditional method, with significantly better results in several measurements. Additional studies using larger cohorts of patients and longer exposure to the online rehabilitation program are required to validate these findings. MDPI 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9699594/ /pubmed/36573730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111764 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Barata, Paula Irina
Crisan, Alexandru Florian
Maritescu, Adelina
Negrean, Rodica Anamaria
Rosca, Ovidiu
Bratosin, Felix
Citu, Cosmin
Oancea, Cristian
Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD
title Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD
title_full Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD
title_fullStr Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD
title_short Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD
title_sort evaluating virtual and inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programs for patients with copd
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36573730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111764
work_keys_str_mv AT baratapaulairina evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd
AT crisanalexandruflorian evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd
AT maritescuadelina evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd
AT negreanrodicaanamaria evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd
AT roscaovidiu evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd
AT bratosinfelix evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd
AT citucosmin evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd
AT oanceacristian evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd