Cargando…
Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasingly frequent disorder that is likely to become the third leading cause of morbidity worldwide. It significantly degrades the quality of life of patients affected and poses a significant financial burden to the healthcare systems providing t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36573730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111764 |
_version_ | 1784839112666120192 |
---|---|
author | Barata, Paula Irina Crisan, Alexandru Florian Maritescu, Adelina Negrean, Rodica Anamaria Rosca, Ovidiu Bratosin, Felix Citu, Cosmin Oancea, Cristian |
author_facet | Barata, Paula Irina Crisan, Alexandru Florian Maritescu, Adelina Negrean, Rodica Anamaria Rosca, Ovidiu Bratosin, Felix Citu, Cosmin Oancea, Cristian |
author_sort | Barata, Paula Irina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasingly frequent disorder that is likely to become the third leading cause of morbidity worldwide. It significantly degrades the quality of life of patients affected and poses a significant financial burden to the healthcare systems providing treatment and rehabilitation. Consequently, our study’s purpose was to compare conventional inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) with virtual (online) PR using a mobile phone application. During a three-month period, two groups of patients followed the research protocol by participating in a pulmonary rehabilitation program administered and supervised by a physical therapist five times per week. A number of respiratory variables were examined before and after the test. At the end of the study period, a total of 72 patients completed the rehabilitation in the inpatient group, respectively 58 in the online group. It was observed that post-test comparison between patients undergoing the traditional and online rehabilitation methods did not show any significant differences. However, the calculated mean differences between pre-test and post-test results were significantly higher in favor of the virtual method. The most significant variations were encountered in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (6.6% vs. 8.5%, p-value < 0.001), 6-min walking test (6MWT) (6.7% vs. 9.4%, p-value < 0.001), and COPD assessment test (CAT) values (4.8 vs. 6.2, p-value < 0.001), respectively. However, the maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) variation was significantly higher in patients undergoing the traditional rehabilitation method, from an average of 4.1% to 3.2% (p-value < 0.001). In this preliminary study, the online pulmonary rehabilitation program proved non-inferiority to the traditional method, with significantly better results in several measurements. Additional studies using larger cohorts of patients and longer exposure to the online rehabilitation program are required to validate these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9699594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96995942022-11-26 Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD Barata, Paula Irina Crisan, Alexandru Florian Maritescu, Adelina Negrean, Rodica Anamaria Rosca, Ovidiu Bratosin, Felix Citu, Cosmin Oancea, Cristian J Pers Med Article Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasingly frequent disorder that is likely to become the third leading cause of morbidity worldwide. It significantly degrades the quality of life of patients affected and poses a significant financial burden to the healthcare systems providing treatment and rehabilitation. Consequently, our study’s purpose was to compare conventional inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) with virtual (online) PR using a mobile phone application. During a three-month period, two groups of patients followed the research protocol by participating in a pulmonary rehabilitation program administered and supervised by a physical therapist five times per week. A number of respiratory variables were examined before and after the test. At the end of the study period, a total of 72 patients completed the rehabilitation in the inpatient group, respectively 58 in the online group. It was observed that post-test comparison between patients undergoing the traditional and online rehabilitation methods did not show any significant differences. However, the calculated mean differences between pre-test and post-test results were significantly higher in favor of the virtual method. The most significant variations were encountered in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (6.6% vs. 8.5%, p-value < 0.001), 6-min walking test (6MWT) (6.7% vs. 9.4%, p-value < 0.001), and COPD assessment test (CAT) values (4.8 vs. 6.2, p-value < 0.001), respectively. However, the maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) variation was significantly higher in patients undergoing the traditional rehabilitation method, from an average of 4.1% to 3.2% (p-value < 0.001). In this preliminary study, the online pulmonary rehabilitation program proved non-inferiority to the traditional method, with significantly better results in several measurements. Additional studies using larger cohorts of patients and longer exposure to the online rehabilitation program are required to validate these findings. MDPI 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9699594/ /pubmed/36573730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111764 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Barata, Paula Irina Crisan, Alexandru Florian Maritescu, Adelina Negrean, Rodica Anamaria Rosca, Ovidiu Bratosin, Felix Citu, Cosmin Oancea, Cristian Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD |
title | Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD |
title_full | Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD |
title_short | Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD |
title_sort | evaluating virtual and inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programs for patients with copd |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36573730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baratapaulairina evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd AT crisanalexandruflorian evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd AT maritescuadelina evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd AT negreanrodicaanamaria evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd AT roscaovidiu evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd AT bratosinfelix evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd AT citucosmin evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd AT oanceacristian evaluatingvirtualandinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramsforpatientswithcopd |