Cargando…
Different reference frames on different axes: Space and language in indigenous Amazonians
Spatial cognition is central to human behavior, but the way people conceptualize space varies within and across groups for unknown reasons. Here, we found that adults from an indigenous Bolivian group used systematically different spatial reference frames on different axes, according to known differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36427312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abp9814 |
_version_ | 1784839130199359488 |
---|---|
author | Pitt, Benjamin Carstensen, Alexandra Boni, Isabelle Piantadosi, Steven T. Gibson, Edward |
author_facet | Pitt, Benjamin Carstensen, Alexandra Boni, Isabelle Piantadosi, Steven T. Gibson, Edward |
author_sort | Pitt, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spatial cognition is central to human behavior, but the way people conceptualize space varies within and across groups for unknown reasons. Here, we found that adults from an indigenous Bolivian group used systematically different spatial reference frames on different axes, according to known differences in their discriminability: In both verbal and nonverbal tests, participants preferred allocentric (i.e., environment-based) space on the left-right axis, where spatial discriminations (like “b” versus “d”) are notoriously difficult, but the same participants preferred egocentric (i.e., body-based) space on the front-back axis, where spatial discrimination is relatively easy. The results (i) establish a relationship between spontaneous spatial language and memory across axes within a single culture, (ii) challenge the claim that each language group has a predominant spatial reference frame at a given scale, and (iii) suggest that spatial thinking and language may both be shaped by spatial discrimination abilities, as they vary across cultures and contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9699666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96996662022-12-05 Different reference frames on different axes: Space and language in indigenous Amazonians Pitt, Benjamin Carstensen, Alexandra Boni, Isabelle Piantadosi, Steven T. Gibson, Edward Sci Adv Neuroscience Spatial cognition is central to human behavior, but the way people conceptualize space varies within and across groups for unknown reasons. Here, we found that adults from an indigenous Bolivian group used systematically different spatial reference frames on different axes, according to known differences in their discriminability: In both verbal and nonverbal tests, participants preferred allocentric (i.e., environment-based) space on the left-right axis, where spatial discriminations (like “b” versus “d”) are notoriously difficult, but the same participants preferred egocentric (i.e., body-based) space on the front-back axis, where spatial discrimination is relatively easy. The results (i) establish a relationship between spontaneous spatial language and memory across axes within a single culture, (ii) challenge the claim that each language group has a predominant spatial reference frame at a given scale, and (iii) suggest that spatial thinking and language may both be shaped by spatial discrimination abilities, as they vary across cultures and contexts. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9699666/ /pubmed/36427312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abp9814 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Pitt, Benjamin Carstensen, Alexandra Boni, Isabelle Piantadosi, Steven T. Gibson, Edward Different reference frames on different axes: Space and language in indigenous Amazonians |
title | Different reference frames on different axes: Space and language in indigenous Amazonians |
title_full | Different reference frames on different axes: Space and language in indigenous Amazonians |
title_fullStr | Different reference frames on different axes: Space and language in indigenous Amazonians |
title_full_unstemmed | Different reference frames on different axes: Space and language in indigenous Amazonians |
title_short | Different reference frames on different axes: Space and language in indigenous Amazonians |
title_sort | different reference frames on different axes: space and language in indigenous amazonians |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36427312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abp9814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pittbenjamin differentreferenceframesondifferentaxesspaceandlanguageinindigenousamazonians AT carstensenalexandra differentreferenceframesondifferentaxesspaceandlanguageinindigenousamazonians AT boniisabelle differentreferenceframesondifferentaxesspaceandlanguageinindigenousamazonians AT piantadosistevent differentreferenceframesondifferentaxesspaceandlanguageinindigenousamazonians AT gibsonedward differentreferenceframesondifferentaxesspaceandlanguageinindigenousamazonians |