Cargando…

Spinal cord stimulation for genitofemoral neuropathy: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Chronic testicular pain due to genitofemoral neuropathy often becomes refractory to conservative medical therapy. Neurostimulation is a potentially useful treatment option, should the neuropathic pain remain refractory to more invasive procedures such as orchiectomy. We provide a case re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mamaril-Davis, James Christopher, Joshi, Neil, Palsma, Ryan, Aguilar-Salinas, Pedro, Walter, Christina M., Hashim, Shamam, Weinand, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447857
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_901_2022
_version_ 1784839179288444928
author Mamaril-Davis, James Christopher
Joshi, Neil
Palsma, Ryan
Aguilar-Salinas, Pedro
Walter, Christina M.
Hashim, Shamam
Weinand, Martin
author_facet Mamaril-Davis, James Christopher
Joshi, Neil
Palsma, Ryan
Aguilar-Salinas, Pedro
Walter, Christina M.
Hashim, Shamam
Weinand, Martin
author_sort Mamaril-Davis, James Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic testicular pain due to genitofemoral neuropathy often becomes refractory to conservative medical therapy. Neurostimulation is a potentially useful treatment option, should the neuropathic pain remain refractory to more invasive procedures such as orchiectomy. We provide a case report of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for successful treatment of genitofemoral neuropathy and have also reviewed the literature to find similar cases which required a similar treatment paradigm. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 42-year-old male underwent SCS for refractory testicular and groin pain. SCS through a four-column, 2 × 8 contact neurostimulator paddle lead, was implanted in the mid-thoracic-9 (T9) vertebral level, providing > 50% testicular pain relief with a decrease in visual analog scale scores from 8–10/10 to 3–4/10. The patient required one adjustment to the stimulation parameters at the time of the 6 weeks follow-up visit due to over-stimulation. He then continued to experience >50% resolution in pain 9 months later. A review of the literature yielded only two similar cases that successfully utilized SCS for treatment of chronic testicular pain. CONCLUSION: SCS should be considered as a possible treatment option for patients with chronic testicular pain localized to the genitofemoral nerve distribution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9699863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96998632022-11-28 Spinal cord stimulation for genitofemoral neuropathy: A case report and review of the literature Mamaril-Davis, James Christopher Joshi, Neil Palsma, Ryan Aguilar-Salinas, Pedro Walter, Christina M. Hashim, Shamam Weinand, Martin Surg Neurol Int Case Report BACKGROUND: Chronic testicular pain due to genitofemoral neuropathy often becomes refractory to conservative medical therapy. Neurostimulation is a potentially useful treatment option, should the neuropathic pain remain refractory to more invasive procedures such as orchiectomy. We provide a case report of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for successful treatment of genitofemoral neuropathy and have also reviewed the literature to find similar cases which required a similar treatment paradigm. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 42-year-old male underwent SCS for refractory testicular and groin pain. SCS through a four-column, 2 × 8 contact neurostimulator paddle lead, was implanted in the mid-thoracic-9 (T9) vertebral level, providing > 50% testicular pain relief with a decrease in visual analog scale scores from 8–10/10 to 3–4/10. The patient required one adjustment to the stimulation parameters at the time of the 6 weeks follow-up visit due to over-stimulation. He then continued to experience >50% resolution in pain 9 months later. A review of the literature yielded only two similar cases that successfully utilized SCS for treatment of chronic testicular pain. CONCLUSION: SCS should be considered as a possible treatment option for patients with chronic testicular pain localized to the genitofemoral nerve distribution. Scientific Scholar 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9699863/ /pubmed/36447857 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_901_2022 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Case Report
Mamaril-Davis, James Christopher
Joshi, Neil
Palsma, Ryan
Aguilar-Salinas, Pedro
Walter, Christina M.
Hashim, Shamam
Weinand, Martin
Spinal cord stimulation for genitofemoral neuropathy: A case report and review of the literature
title Spinal cord stimulation for genitofemoral neuropathy: A case report and review of the literature
title_full Spinal cord stimulation for genitofemoral neuropathy: A case report and review of the literature
title_fullStr Spinal cord stimulation for genitofemoral neuropathy: A case report and review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Spinal cord stimulation for genitofemoral neuropathy: A case report and review of the literature
title_short Spinal cord stimulation for genitofemoral neuropathy: A case report and review of the literature
title_sort spinal cord stimulation for genitofemoral neuropathy: a case report and review of the literature
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447857
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_901_2022
work_keys_str_mv AT mamarildavisjameschristopher spinalcordstimulationforgenitofemoralneuropathyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT joshineil spinalcordstimulationforgenitofemoralneuropathyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT palsmaryan spinalcordstimulationforgenitofemoralneuropathyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT aguilarsalinaspedro spinalcordstimulationforgenitofemoralneuropathyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT walterchristinam spinalcordstimulationforgenitofemoralneuropathyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT hashimshamam spinalcordstimulationforgenitofemoralneuropathyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT weinandmartin spinalcordstimulationforgenitofemoralneuropathyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature