Cargando…

Machine Learning Risk Prediction for Incident Heart Failure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of heart failure (HF); however, little focus is placed on the risk stratification for, and prevention of, incident HF in patients with AF. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to construct and validate a machine learning (ML) prediction model for HF ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamatani, Yasuhiro, Nishi, Hidehisa, Iguchi, Moritake, Esato, Masahiro, Tsuji, Hikari, Wada, Hiromichi, Hasegawa, Koji, Ogawa, Hisashi, Abe, Mitsuru, Fukuda, Shunichi, Akao, Masaharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.07.007
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of heart failure (HF); however, little focus is placed on the risk stratification for, and prevention of, incident HF in patients with AF. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to construct and validate a machine learning (ML) prediction model for HF hospitalization in patients with AF. METHODS: The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of patients with AF in Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan. We divided the data set of the registry into derivation (n = 2,383) and validation (n = 2,011) cohorts. An ML model was built to predict the incidence of HF hospitalization using the derivation cohort, and predictive ability was examined using the validation cohort. RESULTS: HF hospitalization occurred in 606 patients (14%) during a median follow-up period of 4.4 years in the entire registry. Data of transthoracic echocardiography and biomarkers were frequently nominated as important predictive variables across all 6 ML models. The ML model based on a random forest algorithm using 7 variables (age, history of HF, creatinine clearance, cardiothoracic ratio on x-ray, left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction, LV end-systolic diameter, and LV asynergy) had high prediction performance (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC]: 0.75) and was significantly superior to the Framingham HF risk model (AUC: 0.67; P < 0.001). Based on Kaplan-Meier curves, the ML model could stratify the risk of HF hospitalization during the follow-up period (log-rank; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ML model revealed important predictors and helped us to stratify the risk of HF, providing opportunities for the prevention of HF in patients with AF.