Cargando…
Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study
INTRODUCTION: Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing lung cancer and all‐cause mortality according to major trials in the United Kingdom and Europe. However, the best ways of implementing screening in local communities requires an understanding of the population the programme will s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13632 |
_version_ | 1784839239631896576 |
---|---|
author | Cavers, Debbie Nelson, Mia Rostron, Jasmin Robb, Kathryn A. Brown, Lynsey R. Campbell, Christine Akram, Ahsan R. Dickie, Graeme Mackean, Melanie van Beek, Edwin J. R. Sullivan, Frank Steele, Robert J. Neilson, Aileen R. Weller, David |
author_facet | Cavers, Debbie Nelson, Mia Rostron, Jasmin Robb, Kathryn A. Brown, Lynsey R. Campbell, Christine Akram, Ahsan R. Dickie, Graeme Mackean, Melanie van Beek, Edwin J. R. Sullivan, Frank Steele, Robert J. Neilson, Aileen R. Weller, David |
author_sort | Cavers, Debbie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing lung cancer and all‐cause mortality according to major trials in the United Kingdom and Europe. However, the best ways of implementing screening in local communities requires an understanding of the population the programme will serve. We undertook a study to explore the views of those potentially eligible for, and to identify potential barriers and facilitators to taking part in, lung screening, to inform the development of a feasibility study. METHODS: Men and women aged 45–70, living in urban and rural Scotland, and either self‐reported people who smoke or who recently quit, were invited to take part in the study via research agency Taylor McKenzie. Eleven men and 14 women took part in three virtual focus groups exploring their views on lung screening. Focus group transcripts were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis, assisted by QSR NVivo. FINDINGS: Three overarching themes were identified: (1) Knowledge, awareness and acceptability of lung screening, (2) Barriers and facilitators to screening and (3) Promoting screening and implementation ideas. Participants were largely supportive of lung screening in principle and described the importance of the early detection of cancer. Emotional and psychological concerns as well as system‐level and practical issues were discussed as posing barriers and facilitators to lung screening. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the views of people potentially eligible for a lung health check can usefully inform the development of a further study to test the feasibility and acceptability of lung screening in Scotland. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The LUNGSCOT study has convened a patient advisory group to advise on all aspects of study development and implementation. Patient representatives commented on the focus group study design, study materials and ethics application, and two representatives read the focus group transcripts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9700133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97001332022-12-01 Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study Cavers, Debbie Nelson, Mia Rostron, Jasmin Robb, Kathryn A. Brown, Lynsey R. Campbell, Christine Akram, Ahsan R. Dickie, Graeme Mackean, Melanie van Beek, Edwin J. R. Sullivan, Frank Steele, Robert J. Neilson, Aileen R. Weller, David Health Expect Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing lung cancer and all‐cause mortality according to major trials in the United Kingdom and Europe. However, the best ways of implementing screening in local communities requires an understanding of the population the programme will serve. We undertook a study to explore the views of those potentially eligible for, and to identify potential barriers and facilitators to taking part in, lung screening, to inform the development of a feasibility study. METHODS: Men and women aged 45–70, living in urban and rural Scotland, and either self‐reported people who smoke or who recently quit, were invited to take part in the study via research agency Taylor McKenzie. Eleven men and 14 women took part in three virtual focus groups exploring their views on lung screening. Focus group transcripts were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis, assisted by QSR NVivo. FINDINGS: Three overarching themes were identified: (1) Knowledge, awareness and acceptability of lung screening, (2) Barriers and facilitators to screening and (3) Promoting screening and implementation ideas. Participants were largely supportive of lung screening in principle and described the importance of the early detection of cancer. Emotional and psychological concerns as well as system‐level and practical issues were discussed as posing barriers and facilitators to lung screening. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the views of people potentially eligible for a lung health check can usefully inform the development of a further study to test the feasibility and acceptability of lung screening in Scotland. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The LUNGSCOT study has convened a patient advisory group to advise on all aspects of study development and implementation. Patient representatives commented on the focus group study design, study materials and ethics application, and two representatives read the focus group transcripts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-20 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9700133/ /pubmed/36263948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13632 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Cavers, Debbie Nelson, Mia Rostron, Jasmin Robb, Kathryn A. Brown, Lynsey R. Campbell, Christine Akram, Ahsan R. Dickie, Graeme Mackean, Melanie van Beek, Edwin J. R. Sullivan, Frank Steele, Robert J. Neilson, Aileen R. Weller, David Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study |
title | Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study |
title_full | Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study |
title_fullStr | Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study |
title_short | Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study |
title_sort | optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in scotland: focus group participant perspectives in the lungscot study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13632 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caversdebbie optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT nelsonmia optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT rostronjasmin optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT robbkathryna optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT brownlynseyr optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT campbellchristine optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT akramahsanr optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT dickiegraeme optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT mackeanmelanie optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT vanbeekedwinjr optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT sullivanfrank optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT steelerobertj optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT neilsonaileenr optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy AT wellerdavid optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy |