Cargando…

Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study

INTRODUCTION: Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing lung cancer and all‐cause mortality according to major trials in the United Kingdom and Europe. However, the best ways of implementing screening in local communities requires an understanding of the population the programme will s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cavers, Debbie, Nelson, Mia, Rostron, Jasmin, Robb, Kathryn A., Brown, Lynsey R., Campbell, Christine, Akram, Ahsan R., Dickie, Graeme, Mackean, Melanie, van Beek, Edwin J. R., Sullivan, Frank, Steele, Robert J., Neilson, Aileen R., Weller, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13632
_version_ 1784839239631896576
author Cavers, Debbie
Nelson, Mia
Rostron, Jasmin
Robb, Kathryn A.
Brown, Lynsey R.
Campbell, Christine
Akram, Ahsan R.
Dickie, Graeme
Mackean, Melanie
van Beek, Edwin J. R.
Sullivan, Frank
Steele, Robert J.
Neilson, Aileen R.
Weller, David
author_facet Cavers, Debbie
Nelson, Mia
Rostron, Jasmin
Robb, Kathryn A.
Brown, Lynsey R.
Campbell, Christine
Akram, Ahsan R.
Dickie, Graeme
Mackean, Melanie
van Beek, Edwin J. R.
Sullivan, Frank
Steele, Robert J.
Neilson, Aileen R.
Weller, David
author_sort Cavers, Debbie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing lung cancer and all‐cause mortality according to major trials in the United Kingdom and Europe. However, the best ways of implementing screening in local communities requires an understanding of the population the programme will serve. We undertook a study to explore the views of those potentially eligible for, and to identify potential barriers and facilitators to taking part in, lung screening, to inform the development of a feasibility study. METHODS: Men and women aged 45–70, living in urban and rural Scotland, and either self‐reported people who smoke or who recently quit, were invited to take part in the study via research agency Taylor McKenzie. Eleven men and 14 women took part in three virtual focus groups exploring their views on lung screening. Focus group transcripts were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis, assisted by QSR NVivo. FINDINGS: Three overarching themes were identified: (1) Knowledge, awareness and acceptability of lung screening, (2) Barriers and facilitators to screening and (3) Promoting screening and implementation ideas. Participants were largely supportive of lung screening in principle and described the importance of the early detection of cancer. Emotional and psychological concerns as well as system‐level and practical issues were discussed as posing barriers and facilitators to lung screening. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the views of people potentially eligible for a lung health check can usefully inform the development of a further study to test the feasibility and acceptability of lung screening in Scotland. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The LUNGSCOT study has convened a patient advisory group to advise on all aspects of study development and implementation. Patient representatives commented on the focus group study design, study materials and ethics application, and two representatives read the focus group transcripts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9700133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97001332022-12-01 Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study Cavers, Debbie Nelson, Mia Rostron, Jasmin Robb, Kathryn A. Brown, Lynsey R. Campbell, Christine Akram, Ahsan R. Dickie, Graeme Mackean, Melanie van Beek, Edwin J. R. Sullivan, Frank Steele, Robert J. Neilson, Aileen R. Weller, David Health Expect Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing lung cancer and all‐cause mortality according to major trials in the United Kingdom and Europe. However, the best ways of implementing screening in local communities requires an understanding of the population the programme will serve. We undertook a study to explore the views of those potentially eligible for, and to identify potential barriers and facilitators to taking part in, lung screening, to inform the development of a feasibility study. METHODS: Men and women aged 45–70, living in urban and rural Scotland, and either self‐reported people who smoke or who recently quit, were invited to take part in the study via research agency Taylor McKenzie. Eleven men and 14 women took part in three virtual focus groups exploring their views on lung screening. Focus group transcripts were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis, assisted by QSR NVivo. FINDINGS: Three overarching themes were identified: (1) Knowledge, awareness and acceptability of lung screening, (2) Barriers and facilitators to screening and (3) Promoting screening and implementation ideas. Participants were largely supportive of lung screening in principle and described the importance of the early detection of cancer. Emotional and psychological concerns as well as system‐level and practical issues were discussed as posing barriers and facilitators to lung screening. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the views of people potentially eligible for a lung health check can usefully inform the development of a further study to test the feasibility and acceptability of lung screening in Scotland. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The LUNGSCOT study has convened a patient advisory group to advise on all aspects of study development and implementation. Patient representatives commented on the focus group study design, study materials and ethics application, and two representatives read the focus group transcripts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-20 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9700133/ /pubmed/36263948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13632 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cavers, Debbie
Nelson, Mia
Rostron, Jasmin
Robb, Kathryn A.
Brown, Lynsey R.
Campbell, Christine
Akram, Ahsan R.
Dickie, Graeme
Mackean, Melanie
van Beek, Edwin J. R.
Sullivan, Frank
Steele, Robert J.
Neilson, Aileen R.
Weller, David
Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study
title Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study
title_full Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study
title_fullStr Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study
title_short Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study
title_sort optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in scotland: focus group participant perspectives in the lungscot study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13632
work_keys_str_mv AT caversdebbie optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT nelsonmia optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT rostronjasmin optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT robbkathryna optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT brownlynseyr optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT campbellchristine optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT akramahsanr optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT dickiegraeme optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT mackeanmelanie optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT vanbeekedwinjr optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT sullivanfrank optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT steelerobertj optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT neilsonaileenr optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy
AT wellerdavid optimizingtheimplementationoflungcancerscreeninginscotlandfocusgroupparticipantperspectivesinthelungscotstudy