Cargando…
Patient and general practitioner experiences of implementing a medication review intervention in older people with multimorbidity: Process evaluation of the SPPiRE trial
INTRODUCTION: The SPPiRE cluster randomized controlled trial found that a general practitioner (GP)‐delivered medication review that incorporated screening for potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP), a brown bag review and a patient priority assessment, resulted in a significant but small red...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13630 |
_version_ | 1784839251519602688 |
---|---|
author | McCarthy, Caroline Pericin, Ivana Smith, Susan M. Kiely, Bridget Moriarty, Frank Wallace, Emma Clyne, Barbara |
author_facet | McCarthy, Caroline Pericin, Ivana Smith, Susan M. Kiely, Bridget Moriarty, Frank Wallace, Emma Clyne, Barbara |
author_sort | McCarthy, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The SPPiRE cluster randomized controlled trial found that a general practitioner (GP)‐delivered medication review that incorporated screening for potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP), a brown bag review and a patient priority assessment, resulted in a significant but small reduction in the number of medicines and no significant reduction in PIP. This process evaluation aims to explore the experiences of GPs and patients and the potential for system‐wide implementation. METHODS: The trial included 51 general practices and 404 participants with multimorbidity aged ≥65 years, prescribed ≥15 medicines. The process evaluation used mixed methods and ran parallel to the trial. Quantitative data was collected from the SPPiRE intervention website and analysed descriptively. Qualitative data on medication changes were collected from intervention GPs (18/26) and a purposive sample of intervention patients (27/208) via semi‐structured telephone interviews. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic analysis. Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated using a triangulation protocol. RESULTS: The analysis generated two themes, intervention implementation and mechanisms of action, and both were underpinned by the theme of context. Intervention delivery varied among practices and 45 patients (28%) had no review, primarily due to insufficient GP time. 80% of reviewed patients had ≥1 PIP identified, 59% had ≥1 problem identified during the brown bag review and 79% had ≥1 priority recorded. The brown bag review resulted in the most deprescription of medications. GPs and patients responded positively to the intervention but most GPs did not engage with the patient priority‐setting process. GPs identified a lack of integration into practice software and resources as barriers to future implementation. CONCLUSION: The SPPiRE intervention had a small effect in reducing the number of medicines and this was primarily mediated through the brown bag review. The context of resource shortages and deep‐seated views around medical decision‐making influenced intervention implementation. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Qualitative data on the implementation of the medication review and their wider views on their medicines was collected from older people with multimorbidity through semi‐structured telephone interviews. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SPPiRE trial was registered prospectively on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN12752680). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9700182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97001822022-12-01 Patient and general practitioner experiences of implementing a medication review intervention in older people with multimorbidity: Process evaluation of the SPPiRE trial McCarthy, Caroline Pericin, Ivana Smith, Susan M. Kiely, Bridget Moriarty, Frank Wallace, Emma Clyne, Barbara Health Expect Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The SPPiRE cluster randomized controlled trial found that a general practitioner (GP)‐delivered medication review that incorporated screening for potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP), a brown bag review and a patient priority assessment, resulted in a significant but small reduction in the number of medicines and no significant reduction in PIP. This process evaluation aims to explore the experiences of GPs and patients and the potential for system‐wide implementation. METHODS: The trial included 51 general practices and 404 participants with multimorbidity aged ≥65 years, prescribed ≥15 medicines. The process evaluation used mixed methods and ran parallel to the trial. Quantitative data was collected from the SPPiRE intervention website and analysed descriptively. Qualitative data on medication changes were collected from intervention GPs (18/26) and a purposive sample of intervention patients (27/208) via semi‐structured telephone interviews. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic analysis. Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated using a triangulation protocol. RESULTS: The analysis generated two themes, intervention implementation and mechanisms of action, and both were underpinned by the theme of context. Intervention delivery varied among practices and 45 patients (28%) had no review, primarily due to insufficient GP time. 80% of reviewed patients had ≥1 PIP identified, 59% had ≥1 problem identified during the brown bag review and 79% had ≥1 priority recorded. The brown bag review resulted in the most deprescription of medications. GPs and patients responded positively to the intervention but most GPs did not engage with the patient priority‐setting process. GPs identified a lack of integration into practice software and resources as barriers to future implementation. CONCLUSION: The SPPiRE intervention had a small effect in reducing the number of medicines and this was primarily mediated through the brown bag review. The context of resource shortages and deep‐seated views around medical decision‐making influenced intervention implementation. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Qualitative data on the implementation of the medication review and their wider views on their medicines was collected from older people with multimorbidity through semi‐structured telephone interviews. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SPPiRE trial was registered prospectively on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN12752680). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-17 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9700182/ /pubmed/36245339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13630 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles McCarthy, Caroline Pericin, Ivana Smith, Susan M. Kiely, Bridget Moriarty, Frank Wallace, Emma Clyne, Barbara Patient and general practitioner experiences of implementing a medication review intervention in older people with multimorbidity: Process evaluation of the SPPiRE trial |
title | Patient and general practitioner experiences of implementing a medication review intervention in older people with multimorbidity: Process evaluation of the SPPiRE trial |
title_full | Patient and general practitioner experiences of implementing a medication review intervention in older people with multimorbidity: Process evaluation of the SPPiRE trial |
title_fullStr | Patient and general practitioner experiences of implementing a medication review intervention in older people with multimorbidity: Process evaluation of the SPPiRE trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient and general practitioner experiences of implementing a medication review intervention in older people with multimorbidity: Process evaluation of the SPPiRE trial |
title_short | Patient and general practitioner experiences of implementing a medication review intervention in older people with multimorbidity: Process evaluation of the SPPiRE trial |
title_sort | patient and general practitioner experiences of implementing a medication review intervention in older people with multimorbidity: process evaluation of the sppire trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13630 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccarthycaroline patientandgeneralpractitionerexperiencesofimplementingamedicationreviewinterventioninolderpeoplewithmultimorbidityprocessevaluationofthesppiretrial AT pericinivana patientandgeneralpractitionerexperiencesofimplementingamedicationreviewinterventioninolderpeoplewithmultimorbidityprocessevaluationofthesppiretrial AT smithsusanm patientandgeneralpractitionerexperiencesofimplementingamedicationreviewinterventioninolderpeoplewithmultimorbidityprocessevaluationofthesppiretrial AT kielybridget patientandgeneralpractitionerexperiencesofimplementingamedicationreviewinterventioninolderpeoplewithmultimorbidityprocessevaluationofthesppiretrial AT moriartyfrank patientandgeneralpractitionerexperiencesofimplementingamedicationreviewinterventioninolderpeoplewithmultimorbidityprocessevaluationofthesppiretrial AT wallaceemma patientandgeneralpractitionerexperiencesofimplementingamedicationreviewinterventioninolderpeoplewithmultimorbidityprocessevaluationofthesppiretrial AT clynebarbara patientandgeneralpractitionerexperiencesofimplementingamedicationreviewinterventioninolderpeoplewithmultimorbidityprocessevaluationofthesppiretrial |