Cargando…

Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak (AL) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a well-described source of morbidity for patients undergoing surgical treatment of esophageal neoplasm. With improved early recognition and endoscopic management techniques, the long-term impact remains unclear. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simitian, Grigor S., Hall, David J., Leverson, Glen, Lushaj, Entela B., Lewis, Erik E., Musgrove, Kelsey A., McCarthy, Daniel P., Maloney, James D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.002
_version_ 1784839284153384960
author Simitian, Grigor S.
Hall, David J.
Leverson, Glen
Lushaj, Entela B.
Lewis, Erik E.
Musgrove, Kelsey A.
McCarthy, Daniel P.
Maloney, James D.
author_facet Simitian, Grigor S.
Hall, David J.
Leverson, Glen
Lushaj, Entela B.
Lewis, Erik E.
Musgrove, Kelsey A.
McCarthy, Daniel P.
Maloney, James D.
author_sort Simitian, Grigor S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak (AL) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a well-described source of morbidity for patients undergoing surgical treatment of esophageal neoplasm. With improved early recognition and endoscopic management techniques, the long-term impact remains unclear. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent MIE for esophageal neoplasm between January 2015 and June 2021 at a single institution. Cohorts were stratified by development of AL and subsequent management. Baseline demographics, perioperative data, and post-operative outcomes were examined. RESULTS: During this period, 172 MIEs were performed, with 35 of 172 (20.3%) complicated by an AL. Perioperative factors independently associated with AL were post-operative blood transfusion (leak rate 52.9% versus 16.8%; p = 0.0017), incompleteness of anastomotic rings (75.0% vs 19.1%; p = 0.027), and receiving neoadjuvant therapy (18.5% vs 30.8%; p < 0.0001). Inferior short-term outcomes associated with AL included number of esophageal dilations in the first post-operative year (1.40 vs 0.46, p = 0.0397), discharge disposition to a location other than home (22.9% vs 8.8%, p = 0.012), length of hospital stay (17.7 days vs 9.6 days; p = 0.002), and time until jejunostomy tube removal (134 days vs 79 days; p = 0.0023). There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with or without an AL at 1 year (79% vs 83%) or 5 years (50% vs 47%) (overall log rank p = 0.758). CONCLUSIONS: In this large single-center series of MIEs, AL was associated with inferior short-term outcomes including hospital length of stay, discharge disposition other than to home, and need for additional endoscopic procedures, without an accompanying impact on 1-year or 5-year survival. KEY MESSAGE: In this large, single-center series of minimally invasive esophagectomies, anastomotic leak was associated with worse short-term outcomes including hospital length of stay, discharge disposition other than to home, and need for additional endoscopic procedures, but was not associated with worse long-term survival. The significant association between neoadjuvant therapy and decreased leak rates is difficult to interpret, given the potential for confounding factors, thus careful attention to modifiable pre- and peri-operative patient factors associated with anastomotic leak is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9700313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97003132022-11-27 Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience Simitian, Grigor S. Hall, David J. Leverson, Glen Lushaj, Entela B. Lewis, Erik E. Musgrove, Kelsey A. McCarthy, Daniel P. Maloney, James D. Surg Open Sci Research Paper BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak (AL) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a well-described source of morbidity for patients undergoing surgical treatment of esophageal neoplasm. With improved early recognition and endoscopic management techniques, the long-term impact remains unclear. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent MIE for esophageal neoplasm between January 2015 and June 2021 at a single institution. Cohorts were stratified by development of AL and subsequent management. Baseline demographics, perioperative data, and post-operative outcomes were examined. RESULTS: During this period, 172 MIEs were performed, with 35 of 172 (20.3%) complicated by an AL. Perioperative factors independently associated with AL were post-operative blood transfusion (leak rate 52.9% versus 16.8%; p = 0.0017), incompleteness of anastomotic rings (75.0% vs 19.1%; p = 0.027), and receiving neoadjuvant therapy (18.5% vs 30.8%; p < 0.0001). Inferior short-term outcomes associated with AL included number of esophageal dilations in the first post-operative year (1.40 vs 0.46, p = 0.0397), discharge disposition to a location other than home (22.9% vs 8.8%, p = 0.012), length of hospital stay (17.7 days vs 9.6 days; p = 0.002), and time until jejunostomy tube removal (134 days vs 79 days; p = 0.0023). There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with or without an AL at 1 year (79% vs 83%) or 5 years (50% vs 47%) (overall log rank p = 0.758). CONCLUSIONS: In this large single-center series of MIEs, AL was associated with inferior short-term outcomes including hospital length of stay, discharge disposition other than to home, and need for additional endoscopic procedures, without an accompanying impact on 1-year or 5-year survival. KEY MESSAGE: In this large, single-center series of minimally invasive esophagectomies, anastomotic leak was associated with worse short-term outcomes including hospital length of stay, discharge disposition other than to home, and need for additional endoscopic procedures, but was not associated with worse long-term survival. The significant association between neoadjuvant therapy and decreased leak rates is difficult to interpret, given the potential for confounding factors, thus careful attention to modifiable pre- and peri-operative patient factors associated with anastomotic leak is warranted. Elsevier 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9700313/ /pubmed/36444286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.002 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Simitian, Grigor S.
Hall, David J.
Leverson, Glen
Lushaj, Entela B.
Lewis, Erik E.
Musgrove, Kelsey A.
McCarthy, Daniel P.
Maloney, James D.
Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience
title Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience
title_full Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience
title_fullStr Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience
title_short Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience
title_sort consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center experience
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.002
work_keys_str_mv AT simitiangrigors consequencesofanastomoticleaksafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyasinglecenterexperience
AT halldavidj consequencesofanastomoticleaksafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyasinglecenterexperience
AT leversonglen consequencesofanastomoticleaksafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyasinglecenterexperience
AT lushajentelab consequencesofanastomoticleaksafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyasinglecenterexperience
AT lewiserike consequencesofanastomoticleaksafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyasinglecenterexperience
AT musgrovekelseya consequencesofanastomoticleaksafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyasinglecenterexperience
AT mccarthydanielp consequencesofanastomoticleaksafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyasinglecenterexperience
AT maloneyjamesd consequencesofanastomoticleaksafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyasinglecenterexperience