Regulatory Consideration for the Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Gene Therapies

The nonclinical safety assessments for gene therapies are evolving, leveraging over 20 years of experimental and clinical experience. Despite the growing experience with these therapeutics, there are no approved harmonized global regulatory documents for developing gene therapies with only the ICH (International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use) S12 guidance on nonclinical biodistribution currently under discussion. Several health authorities have issued guidance over the last 15 years on the nonclinical safety aspects for gene therapy products, but many of the recommendations are limited to high-level concepts on nonclinical safety aspects or altogether silent on key topics. Historically, this approach was appropriately vague given our relatively small dataset of nonclinical experience, where a comprehensive and detailed regulatory guidance approach was unlikely to be appropriate to address all scenarios. However, harmonization of key considerations and assumptions can provide a consistent basis for developing the appropriate nonclinical safety development plans for individual programs, reducing uncertainty across regulatory regions and unnecessary animal use. Several key areas of nonclinical safety testing are nearing maturation for a harmonized approach, including species selection, certain aspects of study design, study duration, and unintended genomic integration risks. Furthermore, several emerging topics are unaddressed in current regulatory guidance for gene therapy products, which will become key areas of differentiation for the next generation of therapeutics. These topics include redosing, juvenile/pediatric safety, and reproductive/developmental safety testing, where relevant experience from other modalities can be applied. The rationale and potential study design considerations for these topics will be proposed, acknowledging that certain aspects of gene therapy development are not considered appropriate for harmonization. This article provides an overview of the current nonclinical safety regulatory landscape, summarizes typical nonclinical safety study designs, highlights areas of uncertainty, and discusses emerging topics that warrant consideration. Specific recommendations and perspectives are provided to inform future regulatory discussions and harmonization efforts.