Cargando…

Evaluation of film stimuli for the assessment of social-emotional processing: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Difficulties in top-down and bottom-up emotion generation have been proposed to play a key role in the progression of psychiatric disorders. The aim of the current study was to develop more ecologically valid measures of top-down interpretation biases and bottom-up evoked emotional respo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leppanen, Jenni, Patsalos, Olivia, Surguladze, Sophie, Kerr-Gaffney, Jess, Williams, Steven, Tchanturia, Ketevan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444380
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14160
_version_ 1784839313201037312
author Leppanen, Jenni
Patsalos, Olivia
Surguladze, Sophie
Kerr-Gaffney, Jess
Williams, Steven
Tchanturia, Ketevan
author_facet Leppanen, Jenni
Patsalos, Olivia
Surguladze, Sophie
Kerr-Gaffney, Jess
Williams, Steven
Tchanturia, Ketevan
author_sort Leppanen, Jenni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Difficulties in top-down and bottom-up emotion generation have been proposed to play a key role in the progression of psychiatric disorders. The aim of the current study was to develop more ecologically valid measures of top-down interpretation biases and bottom-up evoked emotional responses. METHODS: A total of 124 healthy female participants aged 18–25 took part in the study. We evaluated two sets of 18 brief film clips. The first set of film clips presented ambiguous social situations designed to examine interpretation biases. Participants provided written interpretations of each ambiguous film clip which were subjected to sentiment analysis. We compared the films in terms of the valence of participants interpretations. The second set of film clips presented neutral and emotionally provoking social scenarios designed to elicit subjective and facial emotional responses. While viewing these film clips participants mood ratings and facial affect were recorded and analysed using exploratory factor analyses. RESULTS: Most of the 18 ambiguous film clips were interpreted in the expected manner while still retaining some ambiguity. However, participants were more attuned to the negative cues in the ambiguous film clips and three film clips were identified as unambiguous. These films clips were deemed unsuitable for assessing interpretation bias. The exploratory factor analyses of participants’ mood ratings and evoked facial affect showed that the positive and negative emotionally provoking film clips formed their own factors as expected. However, there was substantial cross-loading of the neutral film clips when participants’ facial expression data was analysed. DISCUSSION: A subset of the film clips from the two tasks could be used to assess top-down interpretation biases and bottom-up evoked emotional responses. Ambiguous negatively valenced film clips should have more subtle negative cues to avoid ceiling effects and to ensure there is enough room for interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9700451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97004512022-11-27 Evaluation of film stimuli for the assessment of social-emotional processing: a pilot study Leppanen, Jenni Patsalos, Olivia Surguladze, Sophie Kerr-Gaffney, Jess Williams, Steven Tchanturia, Ketevan PeerJ Psychiatry and Psychology BACKGROUND: Difficulties in top-down and bottom-up emotion generation have been proposed to play a key role in the progression of psychiatric disorders. The aim of the current study was to develop more ecologically valid measures of top-down interpretation biases and bottom-up evoked emotional responses. METHODS: A total of 124 healthy female participants aged 18–25 took part in the study. We evaluated two sets of 18 brief film clips. The first set of film clips presented ambiguous social situations designed to examine interpretation biases. Participants provided written interpretations of each ambiguous film clip which were subjected to sentiment analysis. We compared the films in terms of the valence of participants interpretations. The second set of film clips presented neutral and emotionally provoking social scenarios designed to elicit subjective and facial emotional responses. While viewing these film clips participants mood ratings and facial affect were recorded and analysed using exploratory factor analyses. RESULTS: Most of the 18 ambiguous film clips were interpreted in the expected manner while still retaining some ambiguity. However, participants were more attuned to the negative cues in the ambiguous film clips and three film clips were identified as unambiguous. These films clips were deemed unsuitable for assessing interpretation bias. The exploratory factor analyses of participants’ mood ratings and evoked facial affect showed that the positive and negative emotionally provoking film clips formed their own factors as expected. However, there was substantial cross-loading of the neutral film clips when participants’ facial expression data was analysed. DISCUSSION: A subset of the film clips from the two tasks could be used to assess top-down interpretation biases and bottom-up evoked emotional responses. Ambiguous negatively valenced film clips should have more subtle negative cues to avoid ceiling effects and to ensure there is enough room for interpretation. PeerJ Inc. 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9700451/ /pubmed/36444380 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14160 Text en ©2022 Leppanen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Psychiatry and Psychology
Leppanen, Jenni
Patsalos, Olivia
Surguladze, Sophie
Kerr-Gaffney, Jess
Williams, Steven
Tchanturia, Ketevan
Evaluation of film stimuli for the assessment of social-emotional processing: a pilot study
title Evaluation of film stimuli for the assessment of social-emotional processing: a pilot study
title_full Evaluation of film stimuli for the assessment of social-emotional processing: a pilot study
title_fullStr Evaluation of film stimuli for the assessment of social-emotional processing: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of film stimuli for the assessment of social-emotional processing: a pilot study
title_short Evaluation of film stimuli for the assessment of social-emotional processing: a pilot study
title_sort evaluation of film stimuli for the assessment of social-emotional processing: a pilot study
topic Psychiatry and Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444380
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14160
work_keys_str_mv AT leppanenjenni evaluationoffilmstimulifortheassessmentofsocialemotionalprocessingapilotstudy
AT patsalosolivia evaluationoffilmstimulifortheassessmentofsocialemotionalprocessingapilotstudy
AT surguladzesophie evaluationoffilmstimulifortheassessmentofsocialemotionalprocessingapilotstudy
AT kerrgaffneyjess evaluationoffilmstimulifortheassessmentofsocialemotionalprocessingapilotstudy
AT williamssteven evaluationoffilmstimulifortheassessmentofsocialemotionalprocessingapilotstudy
AT tchanturiaketevan evaluationoffilmstimulifortheassessmentofsocialemotionalprocessingapilotstudy