Cargando…

Gründerzeit. Hightech und Alternativen der Wissenschaft in West-Berlin

Launched in 1982, the so-called Berliner Wissenschaftsladen e. V. (WILAB) belonged to the scattered West-German ventures in “counter-science”. This article situates the origins of the “Laden” (~ workshop)—an “alternative” spin-off of sorts, spawned from the Technical University of Berlin—in the cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stadler, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36301328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00048-022-00352-9
Descripción
Sumario:Launched in 1982, the so-called Berliner Wissenschaftsladen e. V. (WILAB) belonged to the scattered West-German ventures in “counter-science”. This article situates the origins of the “Laden” (~ workshop)—an “alternative” spin-off of sorts, spawned from the Technical University of Berlin—in the context of contemporary advances in regional science policy. In this connection, the ailing, de-industrializing “island city” arguably even played a certain pioneering role: elements of its multipronged “innovation offensive”, which peaked in the early-to-mid 1980s, were visible beyond city limits, including the trade show BIG TECH and, notably, the Berlin Center for Innovation and New Enterprises (BIG), the FRG’s first start-up “incubator”, which opened in 1983. In other words, politically-minded scientists in tendency now had to deal with conditions that were less and less conducive to dreams of a “socially engaged” and “non-alienated” (counter-)science. Indeed, while hardly opposed to the new gospel of innovation, it’s not surprising that ventures such as WILAB, committed as they were to the production of “socially useful” science, found themselves increasingly marginalized. It’s as such a marginal venture, my argument goes, that WILAB’s prima facie hopeless attempt to initiate a different, more “humane” information technology sheds an instructive light on the emergence of “entrepreneurial” science in the FRG during the 1970s and 1980s.