Cargando…

Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived ventricular volumes and function guide clinical decision-making for various cardiac pathologies. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and clinical applicability of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) method for performing biventricular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatipoglu, Suzan, Mohiaddin, Raad H., Gatehouse, Peter, Alpendurada, Francisco, Baksi, A. John, Izgi, Cemil, Prasad, Sanjay K., Pennell, Dudley J., Krupickova, Sylvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1
_version_ 1784839340034097152
author Hatipoglu, Suzan
Mohiaddin, Raad H.
Gatehouse, Peter
Alpendurada, Francisco
Baksi, A. John
Izgi, Cemil
Prasad, Sanjay K.
Pennell, Dudley J.
Krupickova, Sylvia
author_facet Hatipoglu, Suzan
Mohiaddin, Raad H.
Gatehouse, Peter
Alpendurada, Francisco
Baksi, A. John
Izgi, Cemil
Prasad, Sanjay K.
Pennell, Dudley J.
Krupickova, Sylvia
author_sort Hatipoglu, Suzan
collection PubMed
description Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived ventricular volumes and function guide clinical decision-making for various cardiac pathologies. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and clinical applicability of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) method for performing biventricular volumetric analysis. Three-hundred CMR studies (100 with normal CMR findings, 50 dilated cardiomyopathy, 50 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 50 ischaemic heart disease and 50 congenital or valvular heart disease) were randomly selected from database. Manual biventricular volumetric analysis (CMRtools) results were derived from clinical reports and automated volumetric analyses were performed using short axis volumetry AI function of CircleCVI(42) v5.12 software. For 20 studies, a combined method of manually adjusted AI contours was tested and all three methods were timed. Clinicians` confidence in AI method was assessed using an online survey. Although agreement was better for left ventricle than right ventricle, AI analysis results were comparable to manual method. Manual adjustment of AI contours further improved agreement: within subject coefficient of variation decreased from 5.0% to 4.5% for left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and from 9.9% to 7.1% for right ventricular EF. Twenty manual analyses were performed in 250 min 12 s whereas same task took 5 min 48 s using AI method. Clinicians were open to adopt AI but concerns about accuracy and validity were raised. The AI method provides clinically valid outcomes and saves significant time. To address concerns raised by survey participants and overcome shortcomings of the automated myocardial segmentation, visual assessment of contours and performing manual corrections where necessary appears to be a practical approach. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9700578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97005782022-11-27 Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting Hatipoglu, Suzan Mohiaddin, Raad H. Gatehouse, Peter Alpendurada, Francisco Baksi, A. John Izgi, Cemil Prasad, Sanjay K. Pennell, Dudley J. Krupickova, Sylvia Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived ventricular volumes and function guide clinical decision-making for various cardiac pathologies. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and clinical applicability of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) method for performing biventricular volumetric analysis. Three-hundred CMR studies (100 with normal CMR findings, 50 dilated cardiomyopathy, 50 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 50 ischaemic heart disease and 50 congenital or valvular heart disease) were randomly selected from database. Manual biventricular volumetric analysis (CMRtools) results were derived from clinical reports and automated volumetric analyses were performed using short axis volumetry AI function of CircleCVI(42) v5.12 software. For 20 studies, a combined method of manually adjusted AI contours was tested and all three methods were timed. Clinicians` confidence in AI method was assessed using an online survey. Although agreement was better for left ventricle than right ventricle, AI analysis results were comparable to manual method. Manual adjustment of AI contours further improved agreement: within subject coefficient of variation decreased from 5.0% to 4.5% for left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and from 9.9% to 7.1% for right ventricular EF. Twenty manual analyses were performed in 250 min 12 s whereas same task took 5 min 48 s using AI method. Clinicians were open to adopt AI but concerns about accuracy and validity were raised. The AI method provides clinically valid outcomes and saves significant time. To address concerns raised by survey participants and overcome shortcomings of the automated myocardial segmentation, visual assessment of contours and performing manual corrections where necessary appears to be a practical approach. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1. Springer Netherlands 2022-06-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9700578/ /pubmed/36434343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hatipoglu, Suzan
Mohiaddin, Raad H.
Gatehouse, Peter
Alpendurada, Francisco
Baksi, A. John
Izgi, Cemil
Prasad, Sanjay K.
Pennell, Dudley J.
Krupickova, Sylvia
Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting
title Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting
title_full Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting
title_fullStr Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting
title_full_unstemmed Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting
title_short Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting
title_sort performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hatipoglusuzan performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting
AT mohiaddinraadh performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting
AT gatehousepeter performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting
AT alpenduradafrancisco performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting
AT baksiajohn performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting
AT izgicemil performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting
AT prasadsanjayk performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting
AT pennelldudleyj performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting
AT krupickovasylvia performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting