Cargando…
Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived ventricular volumes and function guide clinical decision-making for various cardiac pathologies. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and clinical applicability of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) method for performing biventricular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1 |
_version_ | 1784839340034097152 |
---|---|
author | Hatipoglu, Suzan Mohiaddin, Raad H. Gatehouse, Peter Alpendurada, Francisco Baksi, A. John Izgi, Cemil Prasad, Sanjay K. Pennell, Dudley J. Krupickova, Sylvia |
author_facet | Hatipoglu, Suzan Mohiaddin, Raad H. Gatehouse, Peter Alpendurada, Francisco Baksi, A. John Izgi, Cemil Prasad, Sanjay K. Pennell, Dudley J. Krupickova, Sylvia |
author_sort | Hatipoglu, Suzan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived ventricular volumes and function guide clinical decision-making for various cardiac pathologies. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and clinical applicability of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) method for performing biventricular volumetric analysis. Three-hundred CMR studies (100 with normal CMR findings, 50 dilated cardiomyopathy, 50 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 50 ischaemic heart disease and 50 congenital or valvular heart disease) were randomly selected from database. Manual biventricular volumetric analysis (CMRtools) results were derived from clinical reports and automated volumetric analyses were performed using short axis volumetry AI function of CircleCVI(42) v5.12 software. For 20 studies, a combined method of manually adjusted AI contours was tested and all three methods were timed. Clinicians` confidence in AI method was assessed using an online survey. Although agreement was better for left ventricle than right ventricle, AI analysis results were comparable to manual method. Manual adjustment of AI contours further improved agreement: within subject coefficient of variation decreased from 5.0% to 4.5% for left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and from 9.9% to 7.1% for right ventricular EF. Twenty manual analyses were performed in 250 min 12 s whereas same task took 5 min 48 s using AI method. Clinicians were open to adopt AI but concerns about accuracy and validity were raised. The AI method provides clinically valid outcomes and saves significant time. To address concerns raised by survey participants and overcome shortcomings of the automated myocardial segmentation, visual assessment of contours and performing manual corrections where necessary appears to be a practical approach. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9700578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97005782022-11-27 Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting Hatipoglu, Suzan Mohiaddin, Raad H. Gatehouse, Peter Alpendurada, Francisco Baksi, A. John Izgi, Cemil Prasad, Sanjay K. Pennell, Dudley J. Krupickova, Sylvia Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived ventricular volumes and function guide clinical decision-making for various cardiac pathologies. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and clinical applicability of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) method for performing biventricular volumetric analysis. Three-hundred CMR studies (100 with normal CMR findings, 50 dilated cardiomyopathy, 50 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 50 ischaemic heart disease and 50 congenital or valvular heart disease) were randomly selected from database. Manual biventricular volumetric analysis (CMRtools) results were derived from clinical reports and automated volumetric analyses were performed using short axis volumetry AI function of CircleCVI(42) v5.12 software. For 20 studies, a combined method of manually adjusted AI contours was tested and all three methods were timed. Clinicians` confidence in AI method was assessed using an online survey. Although agreement was better for left ventricle than right ventricle, AI analysis results were comparable to manual method. Manual adjustment of AI contours further improved agreement: within subject coefficient of variation decreased from 5.0% to 4.5% for left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and from 9.9% to 7.1% for right ventricular EF. Twenty manual analyses were performed in 250 min 12 s whereas same task took 5 min 48 s using AI method. Clinicians were open to adopt AI but concerns about accuracy and validity were raised. The AI method provides clinically valid outcomes and saves significant time. To address concerns raised by survey participants and overcome shortcomings of the automated myocardial segmentation, visual assessment of contours and performing manual corrections where necessary appears to be a practical approach. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1. Springer Netherlands 2022-06-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9700578/ /pubmed/36434343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Hatipoglu, Suzan Mohiaddin, Raad H. Gatehouse, Peter Alpendurada, Francisco Baksi, A. John Izgi, Cemil Prasad, Sanjay K. Pennell, Dudley J. Krupickova, Sylvia Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting |
title | Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting |
title_full | Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting |
title_fullStr | Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting |
title_short | Performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting |
title_sort | performance of artificial intelligence for biventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetric analysis in the clinical setting |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hatipoglusuzan performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting AT mohiaddinraadh performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting AT gatehousepeter performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting AT alpenduradafrancisco performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting AT baksiajohn performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting AT izgicemil performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting AT prasadsanjayk performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting AT pennelldudleyj performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting AT krupickovasylvia performanceofartificialintelligenceforbiventricularcardiovascularmagneticresonancevolumetricanalysisintheclinicalsetting |