Cargando…

Vertical head rotation as major source of differences between time-separated digital cephalometric radiographs of patients acquired in one cephalostat X-ray device

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the retrospective study was to analyze the reliability and repeatability of specific landmark-positions used in cephalometry to determine the major sources of absolute landmark position differences for repeated, time-separated (time-point I and II) digital cephalometric ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulze, Ralf K. W., Linnerth, Lea K. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00935-x
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The purpose of the retrospective study was to analyze the reliability and repeatability of specific landmark-positions used in cephalometry to determine the major sources of absolute landmark position differences for repeated, time-separated (time-point I and II) digital cephalometric radiographs (CEPH) of the same patients. METHODS: 100 pairs of CPEHs from the database of a sample of adult patients (18 to 28 years) were analyzed by one calibrated observer and three landmark points (Sella: S, Nasion: N, Subspinale: A) were digitally marked using ImageJ-software. The coordinates of these points entered the evaluation using displacement vectors as primary endpoints between the coordinates of the landmarks in the two images as well as SNA-angles and the angle ω of SN relative to the floor. RESULTS: Displacement vectors between CEPHI and CEPHII were rather large (N: 7.95 ± 4.85 mm, S: 5.34 ± 3.50 mm, A: 4.81 ± 3.95 mm. SNA was rather stable between the two sequential radiographs (mean difference: 0.002° ± 1.85°). and did not correlate with age of the patient (SNA(I): spearman-Rho: 0.0239, p = 0.8134; SNA(II) : spearman-Rho: 0.0244, p = 0.8096). Although the vertical angle ω did not differ between CEPH(I) and CEPH(II) (mean difference: 0.4° ± 4.7°, p(wilcoxon) = 0.8155), it showed a quadratic relationship (p(F−statistic): < 2.2e−16) with the length of the displacement vector N. CONCLUSION: The significantly varying location of the reference points S, N and A between time-separated CEPHs of one patient can largely be explained by different angulation (head rotation within the sagittal plane) of the Frankfurt plane to the floor (horizontal plane).