Cargando…

Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Public safety personnel (PSP) are exposed to potentially psychologically traumatic events (PPTE) far more often than the general public, which increases the risk for various post-traumatic stress injuries (PTSIs). While there are many evidence-based psychological interventions for PTSI,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahji, Anees, Di Nota, Paula M., Groll, Dianne, Carleton, R. Nicholas, Anderson, Gregory S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02112-1
_version_ 1784839448397086720
author Bahji, Anees
Di Nota, Paula M.
Groll, Dianne
Carleton, R. Nicholas
Anderson, Gregory S.
author_facet Bahji, Anees
Di Nota, Paula M.
Groll, Dianne
Carleton, R. Nicholas
Anderson, Gregory S.
author_sort Bahji, Anees
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public safety personnel (PSP) are exposed to potentially psychologically traumatic events (PPTE) far more often than the general public, which increases the risk for various post-traumatic stress injuries (PTSIs). While there are many evidence-based psychological interventions for PTSI, the effectiveness of each intervention for PSP remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The current study assessed the effectiveness and acceptability of psychological interventions for PTSI among PSPs. METHODS: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis were performed on the effectiveness and acceptability of psychotherapies for PTSIs (i.e., symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder) among PSP. The review adhered to the PRISMA reporting guidelines and used standardized mean differences (Cohen’s d), rate ratios (RR), and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to measure pooled effect sizes across studies; negative d values and RR values less than one indicated a reduction in symptoms compared to baseline or control groups. In addition, heterogeneity was quantified using I(2), and publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test. RESULTS: The analyses included data from eight randomized controlled trials representing 402 PSP (79.4% male, 35.3 years). Psychological interventions included narrative exposure therapy (n = 1), cognitive behavioral therapy (n = 2), eclectic psychotherapy (n = 2), eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing (n = 1), supportive counseling (n = 2), and group critical incident stress debriefing (n = 1). The interventions were associated with statistically significant reductions in symptoms associated with PTSD (d = − 1.23; 95% CI − 1.81, − 0.65; 7 studies; I(2) = 81%), anxiety (− 0.76; 95% CI − 1.28, − 0.24; 3 studies; I(2) = 47%), and depression (d = − 1.10; 95% CI − 1.62, − 0.58; 5 studies; I(2) = 64%). There were smaller but statistically significant improvements at follow-up for symptoms of PTSD (d = − 1.29 [− 2.31, − 0.27]), anxiety (d = − 0.82 [− 1.20, − 0.44]), and depression (d = − 0.46 [− 0.77, − 0.14]). There were no statistically significant differences in dropout rates (RR = 1.00 [0.96, 1.05]), suggesting high acceptability across interventions. CONCLUSIONS: There is preliminary evidence that psychotherapies help treat PTSIs in PSP; however, the shortage of high-quality studies on PSP indicates a need for additional research into treating PTSI among PSP. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42019133534.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9701019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97010192022-11-27 Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bahji, Anees Di Nota, Paula M. Groll, Dianne Carleton, R. Nicholas Anderson, Gregory S. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Public safety personnel (PSP) are exposed to potentially psychologically traumatic events (PPTE) far more often than the general public, which increases the risk for various post-traumatic stress injuries (PTSIs). While there are many evidence-based psychological interventions for PTSI, the effectiveness of each intervention for PSP remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The current study assessed the effectiveness and acceptability of psychological interventions for PTSI among PSPs. METHODS: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis were performed on the effectiveness and acceptability of psychotherapies for PTSIs (i.e., symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder) among PSP. The review adhered to the PRISMA reporting guidelines and used standardized mean differences (Cohen’s d), rate ratios (RR), and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to measure pooled effect sizes across studies; negative d values and RR values less than one indicated a reduction in symptoms compared to baseline or control groups. In addition, heterogeneity was quantified using I(2), and publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test. RESULTS: The analyses included data from eight randomized controlled trials representing 402 PSP (79.4% male, 35.3 years). Psychological interventions included narrative exposure therapy (n = 1), cognitive behavioral therapy (n = 2), eclectic psychotherapy (n = 2), eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing (n = 1), supportive counseling (n = 2), and group critical incident stress debriefing (n = 1). The interventions were associated with statistically significant reductions in symptoms associated with PTSD (d = − 1.23; 95% CI − 1.81, − 0.65; 7 studies; I(2) = 81%), anxiety (− 0.76; 95% CI − 1.28, − 0.24; 3 studies; I(2) = 47%), and depression (d = − 1.10; 95% CI − 1.62, − 0.58; 5 studies; I(2) = 64%). There were smaller but statistically significant improvements at follow-up for symptoms of PTSD (d = − 1.29 [− 2.31, − 0.27]), anxiety (d = − 0.82 [− 1.20, − 0.44]), and depression (d = − 0.46 [− 0.77, − 0.14]). There were no statistically significant differences in dropout rates (RR = 1.00 [0.96, 1.05]), suggesting high acceptability across interventions. CONCLUSIONS: There is preliminary evidence that psychotherapies help treat PTSIs in PSP; however, the shortage of high-quality studies on PSP indicates a need for additional research into treating PTSI among PSP. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42019133534. BioMed Central 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9701019/ /pubmed/36434683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02112-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bahji, Anees
Di Nota, Paula M.
Groll, Dianne
Carleton, R. Nicholas
Anderson, Gregory S.
Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02112-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bahjianees psychologicalinterventionsforposttraumaticstressinjuriesamongpublicsafetypersonnelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dinotapaulam psychologicalinterventionsforposttraumaticstressinjuriesamongpublicsafetypersonnelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grolldianne psychologicalinterventionsforposttraumaticstressinjuriesamongpublicsafetypersonnelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carletonrnicholas psychologicalinterventionsforposttraumaticstressinjuriesamongpublicsafetypersonnelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT andersongregorys psychologicalinterventionsforposttraumaticstressinjuriesamongpublicsafetypersonnelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis