Cargando…
Risk factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness identified from 290 cross-country observational studies until February 2022: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
BACKGROUND: Observational studies made it possible to assess the impact of risk factors on the long-term effectiveness of mRNA and adenoviral vector (AdV) vaccines against COVID-19. METHODS: A computerized literature search was undertaken using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and MedRxiv databases to identify...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02663-z |
_version_ | 1784839464095318016 |
---|---|
author | Petráš, Marek Máčalík, Roman Janovská, Daniela Čelko, Alexander M. Dáňová, Jana Selinger, Eliška Doleček, Jonáš Neradová, Sylva Franklová, Martina Dlouhý, Pavel Rosina, Jozef Lesná, Ivana Králová |
author_facet | Petráš, Marek Máčalík, Roman Janovská, Daniela Čelko, Alexander M. Dáňová, Jana Selinger, Eliška Doleček, Jonáš Neradová, Sylva Franklová, Martina Dlouhý, Pavel Rosina, Jozef Lesná, Ivana Králová |
author_sort | Petráš, Marek |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Observational studies made it possible to assess the impact of risk factors on the long-term effectiveness of mRNA and adenoviral vector (AdV) vaccines against COVID-19. METHODS: A computerized literature search was undertaken using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and MedRxiv databases to identify eligible studies, with no language restrictions, published up to 28 February 2022. Eligible were observational studies assessing vaccine effectiveness (VE) by disease severity with reference groups of unvaccinated participants or participants immunized with one, two, or three vaccine doses. Our study was carried out in compliance with the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. The risk of study bias was identified using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The GRADE guidelines were applied to assess the strength of evidence for the primary outcome. The synthesis was conducted using a meta-analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS: Out of a total of 14,155 publications, 290 studies were included. Early VE of full vaccination against COVID-19 of any symptomatology and severity decreased from 96% (95% CI, 95–96%) for mRNA and from 86% (95% CI, 83–89%) for AdV vaccines to 67% for both vaccine types in the last 2 months of 2021. A similar 1-year decline from 98 to 86% was found for severe COVID-19 after full immunization with mRNA, but not with AdV vaccines providing persistent 82–87% effectiveness. Variant-reduced VE was only associated with Omicron regardless of disease severity, vaccine type, or vaccination completeness. The level of protection was reduced in participants aged >65 years, with a comorbidity or those in long-term care or residential homes independently of the number of doses received. The booster effect of the third mRNA dose was unclear because incompletely restored effectiveness, regardless of disease severity, declined within a short-term interval of 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Full vaccination provided an early high, yet waning level of protection against COVID-19 of any severity with a strong impact on the high-risk population. Moreover, the potential risk of new antigenically distinct variants should not be underestimated, and any future immunization strategy should include variant-updated vaccines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02663-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9701077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97010772022-11-27 Risk factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness identified from 290 cross-country observational studies until February 2022: a meta-analysis and meta-regression Petráš, Marek Máčalík, Roman Janovská, Daniela Čelko, Alexander M. Dáňová, Jana Selinger, Eliška Doleček, Jonáš Neradová, Sylva Franklová, Martina Dlouhý, Pavel Rosina, Jozef Lesná, Ivana Králová BMC Med Review BACKGROUND: Observational studies made it possible to assess the impact of risk factors on the long-term effectiveness of mRNA and adenoviral vector (AdV) vaccines against COVID-19. METHODS: A computerized literature search was undertaken using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and MedRxiv databases to identify eligible studies, with no language restrictions, published up to 28 February 2022. Eligible were observational studies assessing vaccine effectiveness (VE) by disease severity with reference groups of unvaccinated participants or participants immunized with one, two, or three vaccine doses. Our study was carried out in compliance with the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. The risk of study bias was identified using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The GRADE guidelines were applied to assess the strength of evidence for the primary outcome. The synthesis was conducted using a meta-analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS: Out of a total of 14,155 publications, 290 studies were included. Early VE of full vaccination against COVID-19 of any symptomatology and severity decreased from 96% (95% CI, 95–96%) for mRNA and from 86% (95% CI, 83–89%) for AdV vaccines to 67% for both vaccine types in the last 2 months of 2021. A similar 1-year decline from 98 to 86% was found for severe COVID-19 after full immunization with mRNA, but not with AdV vaccines providing persistent 82–87% effectiveness. Variant-reduced VE was only associated with Omicron regardless of disease severity, vaccine type, or vaccination completeness. The level of protection was reduced in participants aged >65 years, with a comorbidity or those in long-term care or residential homes independently of the number of doses received. The booster effect of the third mRNA dose was unclear because incompletely restored effectiveness, regardless of disease severity, declined within a short-term interval of 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Full vaccination provided an early high, yet waning level of protection against COVID-19 of any severity with a strong impact on the high-risk population. Moreover, the potential risk of new antigenically distinct variants should not be underestimated, and any future immunization strategy should include variant-updated vaccines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02663-z. BioMed Central 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9701077/ /pubmed/36434597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02663-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Petráš, Marek Máčalík, Roman Janovská, Daniela Čelko, Alexander M. Dáňová, Jana Selinger, Eliška Doleček, Jonáš Neradová, Sylva Franklová, Martina Dlouhý, Pavel Rosina, Jozef Lesná, Ivana Králová Risk factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness identified from 290 cross-country observational studies until February 2022: a meta-analysis and meta-regression |
title | Risk factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness identified from 290 cross-country observational studies until February 2022: a meta-analysis and meta-regression |
title_full | Risk factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness identified from 290 cross-country observational studies until February 2022: a meta-analysis and meta-regression |
title_fullStr | Risk factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness identified from 290 cross-country observational studies until February 2022: a meta-analysis and meta-regression |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness identified from 290 cross-country observational studies until February 2022: a meta-analysis and meta-regression |
title_short | Risk factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness identified from 290 cross-country observational studies until February 2022: a meta-analysis and meta-regression |
title_sort | risk factors affecting covid-19 vaccine effectiveness identified from 290 cross-country observational studies until february 2022: a meta-analysis and meta-regression |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02663-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petrasmarek riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT macalikroman riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT janovskadaniela riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT celkoalexanderm riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT danovajana riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT selingereliska riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT dolecekjonas riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT neradovasylva riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT franklovamartina riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT dlouhypavel riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT rosinajozef riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression AT lesnaivanakralova riskfactorsaffectingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessidentifiedfrom290crosscountryobservationalstudiesuntilfebruary2022ametaanalysisandmetaregression |