Cargando…

A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition

BACKGROUND: In the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), tumor size is not considered in T1 stage. The present study aimed to find out the optimal cutoff for tumor size to further stratify patients with T1 HCC. METHODS: Operated H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Chao-Wei, Tsai, Hsin-I, Yu, Ming-Chin, Wang, Chih-Chi, Lee, Wei-Chen, Yeh, Ta-Sen, Yeh, Chun-Nan, Lin, Cheng-Yu, Kuo, Tony, Chen, Hsing-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10422-8
_version_ 1784839479645700096
author Lee, Chao-Wei
Tsai, Hsin-I
Yu, Ming-Chin
Wang, Chih-Chi
Lee, Wei-Chen
Yeh, Ta-Sen
Yeh, Chun-Nan
Lin, Cheng-Yu
Kuo, Tony
Chen, Hsing-Yu
author_facet Lee, Chao-Wei
Tsai, Hsin-I
Yu, Ming-Chin
Wang, Chih-Chi
Lee, Wei-Chen
Yeh, Ta-Sen
Yeh, Chun-Nan
Lin, Cheng-Yu
Kuo, Tony
Chen, Hsing-Yu
author_sort Lee, Chao-Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), tumor size is not considered in T1 stage. The present study aimed to find out the optimal cutoff for tumor size to further stratify patients with T1 HCC. METHODS: Operated HCC patients were identified from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD), and the patients with T1bN0M0 tumors were further divided into two groups based on the tumor size. The resulting subgroups were denoted as T1b (≤ cutoff) and T1c (> cutoff). The survivals were compared between T1a/b and T1c as well as T1c and T2. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2018, a total of 2893 patients who underwent surgery for T1N0M0 HCC were identified from the CGRD. After excluding cases who died within 30 days of surgery, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis discovered that T1 tumors > 65 mm (T1c) had survivals similar to those of T2N0M0 tumors. Cox regression multivariate analysis further demonstrated that tumor size > 6.5 cm was an independent poor prognostic indicator for T1 HCC. Sensitivity tests also confirmed that tumors lager than 6.5 cm were significantly more likely to develop both tumor recurrence and liver-specific death after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that tumor size would significantly impact the survival outcome of T1 HCC after surgery. Due to significantly worse survival, we proposed a subclassification within T1 HCC, T1c: solitary tumor > 6.5 cm without vascular invasion, to further stratify those patients at risk. Further studies are mandatory to validate our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12072-022-10422-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9701177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97011772022-11-28 A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition Lee, Chao-Wei Tsai, Hsin-I Yu, Ming-Chin Wang, Chih-Chi Lee, Wei-Chen Yeh, Ta-Sen Yeh, Chun-Nan Lin, Cheng-Yu Kuo, Tony Chen, Hsing-Yu Hepatol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: In the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), tumor size is not considered in T1 stage. The present study aimed to find out the optimal cutoff for tumor size to further stratify patients with T1 HCC. METHODS: Operated HCC patients were identified from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD), and the patients with T1bN0M0 tumors were further divided into two groups based on the tumor size. The resulting subgroups were denoted as T1b (≤ cutoff) and T1c (> cutoff). The survivals were compared between T1a/b and T1c as well as T1c and T2. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2018, a total of 2893 patients who underwent surgery for T1N0M0 HCC were identified from the CGRD. After excluding cases who died within 30 days of surgery, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis discovered that T1 tumors > 65 mm (T1c) had survivals similar to those of T2N0M0 tumors. Cox regression multivariate analysis further demonstrated that tumor size > 6.5 cm was an independent poor prognostic indicator for T1 HCC. Sensitivity tests also confirmed that tumors lager than 6.5 cm were significantly more likely to develop both tumor recurrence and liver-specific death after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that tumor size would significantly impact the survival outcome of T1 HCC after surgery. Due to significantly worse survival, we proposed a subclassification within T1 HCC, T1c: solitary tumor > 6.5 cm without vascular invasion, to further stratify those patients at risk. Further studies are mandatory to validate our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12072-022-10422-8. Springer India 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9701177/ /pubmed/36169915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10422-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Chao-Wei
Tsai, Hsin-I
Yu, Ming-Chin
Wang, Chih-Chi
Lee, Wei-Chen
Yeh, Ta-Sen
Yeh, Chun-Nan
Lin, Cheng-Yu
Kuo, Tony
Chen, Hsing-Yu
A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition
title A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition
title_full A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition
title_fullStr A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition
title_full_unstemmed A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition
title_short A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition
title_sort proposal for t1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the ajcc 8th edition
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10422-8
work_keys_str_mv AT leechaowei aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT tsaihsini aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT yumingchin aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT wangchihchi aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT leeweichen aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT yehtasen aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT yehchunnan aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT linchengyu aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT kuotony aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT chenhsingyu aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT leechaowei proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT tsaihsini proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT yumingchin proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT wangchihchi proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT leeweichen proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT yehtasen proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT yehchunnan proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT linchengyu proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT kuotony proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition
AT chenhsingyu proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition