Cargando…
A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition
BACKGROUND: In the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), tumor size is not considered in T1 stage. The present study aimed to find out the optimal cutoff for tumor size to further stratify patients with T1 HCC. METHODS: Operated H...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer India
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10422-8 |
_version_ | 1784839479645700096 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Chao-Wei Tsai, Hsin-I Yu, Ming-Chin Wang, Chih-Chi Lee, Wei-Chen Yeh, Ta-Sen Yeh, Chun-Nan Lin, Cheng-Yu Kuo, Tony Chen, Hsing-Yu |
author_facet | Lee, Chao-Wei Tsai, Hsin-I Yu, Ming-Chin Wang, Chih-Chi Lee, Wei-Chen Yeh, Ta-Sen Yeh, Chun-Nan Lin, Cheng-Yu Kuo, Tony Chen, Hsing-Yu |
author_sort | Lee, Chao-Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), tumor size is not considered in T1 stage. The present study aimed to find out the optimal cutoff for tumor size to further stratify patients with T1 HCC. METHODS: Operated HCC patients were identified from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD), and the patients with T1bN0M0 tumors were further divided into two groups based on the tumor size. The resulting subgroups were denoted as T1b (≤ cutoff) and T1c (> cutoff). The survivals were compared between T1a/b and T1c as well as T1c and T2. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2018, a total of 2893 patients who underwent surgery for T1N0M0 HCC were identified from the CGRD. After excluding cases who died within 30 days of surgery, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis discovered that T1 tumors > 65 mm (T1c) had survivals similar to those of T2N0M0 tumors. Cox regression multivariate analysis further demonstrated that tumor size > 6.5 cm was an independent poor prognostic indicator for T1 HCC. Sensitivity tests also confirmed that tumors lager than 6.5 cm were significantly more likely to develop both tumor recurrence and liver-specific death after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that tumor size would significantly impact the survival outcome of T1 HCC after surgery. Due to significantly worse survival, we proposed a subclassification within T1 HCC, T1c: solitary tumor > 6.5 cm without vascular invasion, to further stratify those patients at risk. Further studies are mandatory to validate our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12072-022-10422-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9701177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer India |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97011772022-11-28 A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition Lee, Chao-Wei Tsai, Hsin-I Yu, Ming-Chin Wang, Chih-Chi Lee, Wei-Chen Yeh, Ta-Sen Yeh, Chun-Nan Lin, Cheng-Yu Kuo, Tony Chen, Hsing-Yu Hepatol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: In the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), tumor size is not considered in T1 stage. The present study aimed to find out the optimal cutoff for tumor size to further stratify patients with T1 HCC. METHODS: Operated HCC patients were identified from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD), and the patients with T1bN0M0 tumors were further divided into two groups based on the tumor size. The resulting subgroups were denoted as T1b (≤ cutoff) and T1c (> cutoff). The survivals were compared between T1a/b and T1c as well as T1c and T2. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2018, a total of 2893 patients who underwent surgery for T1N0M0 HCC were identified from the CGRD. After excluding cases who died within 30 days of surgery, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis discovered that T1 tumors > 65 mm (T1c) had survivals similar to those of T2N0M0 tumors. Cox regression multivariate analysis further demonstrated that tumor size > 6.5 cm was an independent poor prognostic indicator for T1 HCC. Sensitivity tests also confirmed that tumors lager than 6.5 cm were significantly more likely to develop both tumor recurrence and liver-specific death after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that tumor size would significantly impact the survival outcome of T1 HCC after surgery. Due to significantly worse survival, we proposed a subclassification within T1 HCC, T1c: solitary tumor > 6.5 cm without vascular invasion, to further stratify those patients at risk. Further studies are mandatory to validate our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12072-022-10422-8. Springer India 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9701177/ /pubmed/36169915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10422-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Chao-Wei Tsai, Hsin-I Yu, Ming-Chin Wang, Chih-Chi Lee, Wei-Chen Yeh, Ta-Sen Yeh, Chun-Nan Lin, Cheng-Yu Kuo, Tony Chen, Hsing-Yu A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition |
title | A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition |
title_full | A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition |
title_fullStr | A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition |
title_full_unstemmed | A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition |
title_short | A proposal for T1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the AJCC 8th edition |
title_sort | proposal for t1 subclassification in hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the ajcc 8th edition |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10422-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leechaowei aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT tsaihsini aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT yumingchin aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT wangchihchi aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT leeweichen aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT yehtasen aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT yehchunnan aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT linchengyu aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT kuotony aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT chenhsingyu aproposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT leechaowei proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT tsaihsini proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT yumingchin proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT wangchihchi proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT leeweichen proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT yehtasen proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT yehchunnan proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT linchengyu proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT kuotony proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition AT chenhsingyu proposalfort1subclassificationinhepatocellularcarcinomareappraisaloftheajcc8thedition |