Cargando…
Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). METHODS: Carotid DECTA datasets of 28...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36435892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01308-2 |
_version_ | 1784839498805280768 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Chenyu Jin, Dan Liu, Zhuoheng Zhang, Yan Ni, Ming Yuan, Huishu |
author_facet | Jiang, Chenyu Jin, Dan Liu, Zhuoheng Zhang, Yan Ni, Ming Yuan, Huishu |
author_sort | Jiang, Chenyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). METHODS: Carotid DECTA datasets of 28 consecutive patients were reconstructed at 50 keV using DLIR at low, medium, and high levels (DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H) and 80% ASIR-V algorithms. Mean attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at different levels of arteries were measured and calculated. Image quality for noise and texture, depiction of arteries, and diagnostic performance toward carotid plaques were assessed subjectively by two radiologists. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared between the ASIR-V, DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H groups. RESULTS: The image noise at aorta and common carotid artery, SNR, and CNR at all level arteries of DLIR-H images were significantly higher than those of ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.040). The quantitative analysis of DLIR-L and DLIR-M showed comparable denoise capability with ASIR-V. The overall image quality (p = 0.000) and image noise (p = 0.000–0.014) were significantly better in the DLIR-M and DLIR-H images. The image texture was improved by DLR at all level compared to ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.008). Depictions of head and neck arteries and diagnostic performance were comparable between four groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 80% ASIR-V, we recommend DLIR-H for clinical carotid DECTA reconstruction, which can significantly improve the image quality of carotid DECTA at 50 keV but maintain a desirable diagnostic performance and arterial depiction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9701290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97012902022-11-28 Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance Jiang, Chenyu Jin, Dan Liu, Zhuoheng Zhang, Yan Ni, Ming Yuan, Huishu Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). METHODS: Carotid DECTA datasets of 28 consecutive patients were reconstructed at 50 keV using DLIR at low, medium, and high levels (DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H) and 80% ASIR-V algorithms. Mean attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at different levels of arteries were measured and calculated. Image quality for noise and texture, depiction of arteries, and diagnostic performance toward carotid plaques were assessed subjectively by two radiologists. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared between the ASIR-V, DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H groups. RESULTS: The image noise at aorta and common carotid artery, SNR, and CNR at all level arteries of DLIR-H images were significantly higher than those of ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.040). The quantitative analysis of DLIR-L and DLIR-M showed comparable denoise capability with ASIR-V. The overall image quality (p = 0.000) and image noise (p = 0.000–0.014) were significantly better in the DLIR-M and DLIR-H images. The image texture was improved by DLR at all level compared to ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.008). Depictions of head and neck arteries and diagnostic performance were comparable between four groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 80% ASIR-V, we recommend DLIR-H for clinical carotid DECTA reconstruction, which can significantly improve the image quality of carotid DECTA at 50 keV but maintain a desirable diagnostic performance and arterial depiction. Springer Vienna 2022-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9701290/ /pubmed/36435892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01308-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jiang, Chenyu Jin, Dan Liu, Zhuoheng Zhang, Yan Ni, Ming Yuan, Huishu Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance |
title | Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance |
title_full | Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance |
title_fullStr | Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance |
title_short | Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance |
title_sort | deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36435892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01308-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangchenyu deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance AT jindan deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance AT liuzhuoheng deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance AT zhangyan deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance AT niming deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance AT yuanhuishu deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance |