Cargando…

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). METHODS: Carotid DECTA datasets of 28...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Chenyu, Jin, Dan, Liu, Zhuoheng, Zhang, Yan, Ni, Ming, Yuan, Huishu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36435892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01308-2
_version_ 1784839498805280768
author Jiang, Chenyu
Jin, Dan
Liu, Zhuoheng
Zhang, Yan
Ni, Ming
Yuan, Huishu
author_facet Jiang, Chenyu
Jin, Dan
Liu, Zhuoheng
Zhang, Yan
Ni, Ming
Yuan, Huishu
author_sort Jiang, Chenyu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). METHODS: Carotid DECTA datasets of 28 consecutive patients were reconstructed at 50 keV using DLIR at low, medium, and high levels (DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H) and 80% ASIR-V algorithms. Mean attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at different levels of arteries were measured and calculated. Image quality for noise and texture, depiction of arteries, and diagnostic performance toward carotid plaques were assessed subjectively by two radiologists. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared between the ASIR-V, DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H groups. RESULTS: The image noise at aorta and common carotid artery, SNR, and CNR at all level arteries of DLIR-H images were significantly higher than those of ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.040). The quantitative analysis of DLIR-L and DLIR-M showed comparable denoise capability with ASIR-V. The overall image quality (p = 0.000) and image noise (p = 0.000–0.014) were significantly better in the DLIR-M and DLIR-H images. The image texture was improved by DLR at all level compared to ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.008). Depictions of head and neck arteries and diagnostic performance were comparable between four groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 80% ASIR-V, we recommend DLIR-H for clinical carotid DECTA reconstruction, which can significantly improve the image quality of carotid DECTA at 50 keV but maintain a desirable diagnostic performance and arterial depiction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9701290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97012902022-11-28 Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance Jiang, Chenyu Jin, Dan Liu, Zhuoheng Zhang, Yan Ni, Ming Yuan, Huishu Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). METHODS: Carotid DECTA datasets of 28 consecutive patients were reconstructed at 50 keV using DLIR at low, medium, and high levels (DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H) and 80% ASIR-V algorithms. Mean attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at different levels of arteries were measured and calculated. Image quality for noise and texture, depiction of arteries, and diagnostic performance toward carotid plaques were assessed subjectively by two radiologists. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared between the ASIR-V, DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H groups. RESULTS: The image noise at aorta and common carotid artery, SNR, and CNR at all level arteries of DLIR-H images were significantly higher than those of ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.040). The quantitative analysis of DLIR-L and DLIR-M showed comparable denoise capability with ASIR-V. The overall image quality (p = 0.000) and image noise (p = 0.000–0.014) were significantly better in the DLIR-M and DLIR-H images. The image texture was improved by DLR at all level compared to ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.008). Depictions of head and neck arteries and diagnostic performance were comparable between four groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 80% ASIR-V, we recommend DLIR-H for clinical carotid DECTA reconstruction, which can significantly improve the image quality of carotid DECTA at 50 keV but maintain a desirable diagnostic performance and arterial depiction. Springer Vienna 2022-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9701290/ /pubmed/36435892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01308-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Jiang, Chenyu
Jin, Dan
Liu, Zhuoheng
Zhang, Yan
Ni, Ming
Yuan, Huishu
Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance
title Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance
title_full Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance
title_fullStr Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance
title_short Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance
title_sort deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36435892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01308-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangchenyu deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT jindan deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT liuzhuoheng deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT zhangyan deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT niming deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT yuanhuishu deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmforcarotiddualenergycomputedtomographyangiographyevaluationofimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance