Cargando…

Prevalence of Dens Invaginatus assessed by CBCT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Dens invaginatus is a developmental dental anomaly resulting from an invagination of dental tissues folding from the outer surface towards dental pulp. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of dens invaginatus using cone beam computed tomogra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González-Mancilla, Sara, Montero-Miralles, Paloma, Saúco-Márquez, Juan J., Areal-Quecuty, Victoria, Cabanillas-Balsera, Daniel, Segura-Egea, Juan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36458027
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59849
_version_ 1784839509301526528
author González-Mancilla, Sara
Montero-Miralles, Paloma
Saúco-Márquez, Juan J.
Areal-Quecuty, Victoria
Cabanillas-Balsera, Daniel
Segura-Egea, Juan J.
author_facet González-Mancilla, Sara
Montero-Miralles, Paloma
Saúco-Márquez, Juan J.
Areal-Quecuty, Victoria
Cabanillas-Balsera, Daniel
Segura-Egea, Juan J.
author_sort González-Mancilla, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dens invaginatus is a developmental dental anomaly resulting from an invagination of dental tissues folding from the outer surface towards dental pulp. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of dens invaginatus using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA statements. The research question was: What is the prevalence of dens invaginatus in the adult population assessed by CBCT? The MeSH terms were used to search articles published in the electronic database PubMed. Studies were selected considering predetermined eligibility criteria. The Robins-I tool developed by Cochrane was used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias. RESULTS: Four studies were included in this systematic review, including 2009 CBCT images. The overall prevalence of dens invaginatus was 9.0% (95% CI = 7.2 – 10.8%; p< 0.001). Three studies were considered of low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that prevalence of dens invaginatus using CBCT was higher than previous estimations carried out with conventional radiographs. Therefore, an early identification and a correct management of invaginated teeth is essential for improving the prognosis of these teeth. It can be concluded that teeth with dens invaginatus should always be studied using CBCT. Key words:Dens invaginatus, Dens in dente, Dental anomalies, CBCT, Cone beam computed tomography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9701346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97013462022-11-30 Prevalence of Dens Invaginatus assessed by CBCT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis González-Mancilla, Sara Montero-Miralles, Paloma Saúco-Márquez, Juan J. Areal-Quecuty, Victoria Cabanillas-Balsera, Daniel Segura-Egea, Juan J. J Clin Exp Dent Review BACKGROUND: Dens invaginatus is a developmental dental anomaly resulting from an invagination of dental tissues folding from the outer surface towards dental pulp. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of dens invaginatus using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA statements. The research question was: What is the prevalence of dens invaginatus in the adult population assessed by CBCT? The MeSH terms were used to search articles published in the electronic database PubMed. Studies were selected considering predetermined eligibility criteria. The Robins-I tool developed by Cochrane was used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias. RESULTS: Four studies were included in this systematic review, including 2009 CBCT images. The overall prevalence of dens invaginatus was 9.0% (95% CI = 7.2 – 10.8%; p< 0.001). Three studies were considered of low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that prevalence of dens invaginatus using CBCT was higher than previous estimations carried out with conventional radiographs. Therefore, an early identification and a correct management of invaginated teeth is essential for improving the prognosis of these teeth. It can be concluded that teeth with dens invaginatus should always be studied using CBCT. Key words:Dens invaginatus, Dens in dente, Dental anomalies, CBCT, Cone beam computed tomography. Medicina Oral S.L. 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9701346/ /pubmed/36458027 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59849 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
González-Mancilla, Sara
Montero-Miralles, Paloma
Saúco-Márquez, Juan J.
Areal-Quecuty, Victoria
Cabanillas-Balsera, Daniel
Segura-Egea, Juan J.
Prevalence of Dens Invaginatus assessed by CBCT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Prevalence of Dens Invaginatus assessed by CBCT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Prevalence of Dens Invaginatus assessed by CBCT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of Dens Invaginatus assessed by CBCT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Dens Invaginatus assessed by CBCT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Prevalence of Dens Invaginatus assessed by CBCT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort prevalence of dens invaginatus assessed by cbct: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36458027
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59849
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezmancillasara prevalenceofdensinvaginatusassessedbycbctsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT monteromirallespaloma prevalenceofdensinvaginatusassessedbycbctsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saucomarquezjuanj prevalenceofdensinvaginatusassessedbycbctsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT arealquecutyvictoria prevalenceofdensinvaginatusassessedbycbctsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cabanillasbalseradaniel prevalenceofdensinvaginatusassessedbycbctsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT seguraegeajuanj prevalenceofdensinvaginatusassessedbycbctsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis