Cargando…

Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail

BACKGROUND: Audit and Feedback (A&F), a strategy aimed at promoting modified practice through performance feedback, is a method to change provider behaviour and reduce unnecessary medical services. This study aims to assess the use of A&F to reduce antibiotic prescribing for viral infections...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singer, Alexander, Kosowan, Leanne, Abrams, Elissa M., Katz, Alan, Lix, Lisa, Leong, Katrina, Paige, Allison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36435746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01912-7
_version_ 1784839533289799680
author Singer, Alexander
Kosowan, Leanne
Abrams, Elissa M.
Katz, Alan
Lix, Lisa
Leong, Katrina
Paige, Allison
author_facet Singer, Alexander
Kosowan, Leanne
Abrams, Elissa M.
Katz, Alan
Lix, Lisa
Leong, Katrina
Paige, Allison
author_sort Singer, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Audit and Feedback (A&F), a strategy aimed at promoting modified practice through performance feedback, is a method to change provider behaviour and reduce unnecessary medical services. This study aims to assess the use of A&F to reduce antibiotic prescribing for viral infections and antipsychotic prescribing to patients with dementia. METHODS: Clustered randomized trial of 239 primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada, participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network. Forty-six practices were randomly assigned to one of three groups: control group, intervention 1 (recommendations summary), intervention 2 (recommendations summary and personalized feedback). We assessed prescribing rates prior to the intervention (2014/15), during and immediately after the intervention (2016/17) and following the intervention (2018/19). Physician characteristics were assessed. RESULTS: Between 2014/15–2016/17, 91.6% of providers in intervention group 1 and 95.9% of providers in intervention group 2 reduced their antibiotic and antipsychotic prescribing rate by ≥ 1 compared to the control group (77.6%) (p-value 0.0073). This reduction was maintained into 2018/19 at 91.4%. On multivariate regression alternatively funded providers had 2.4 × higher odds of reducing their antibiotic prescribing rate compared to fee-for-service providers. In quantile regression of providers with a reduction in antibiotic prescribing, alternatively funded (e.g. salaried or locum) providers compared to fee-for-service providers were significant at the 80(th) quantile. CONCLUSIONS: Both A&F and recommendation summaries sent to providers by a trusted source reduced unnecessary prescriptions. Our findings support further scale up of efforts to engage with primary care practices to improve care with A&F. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05385445, retrospectively registered, 23/05/2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01912-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9701433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97014332022-11-28 Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail Singer, Alexander Kosowan, Leanne Abrams, Elissa M. Katz, Alan Lix, Lisa Leong, Katrina Paige, Allison BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Audit and Feedback (A&F), a strategy aimed at promoting modified practice through performance feedback, is a method to change provider behaviour and reduce unnecessary medical services. This study aims to assess the use of A&F to reduce antibiotic prescribing for viral infections and antipsychotic prescribing to patients with dementia. METHODS: Clustered randomized trial of 239 primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada, participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network. Forty-six practices were randomly assigned to one of three groups: control group, intervention 1 (recommendations summary), intervention 2 (recommendations summary and personalized feedback). We assessed prescribing rates prior to the intervention (2014/15), during and immediately after the intervention (2016/17) and following the intervention (2018/19). Physician characteristics were assessed. RESULTS: Between 2014/15–2016/17, 91.6% of providers in intervention group 1 and 95.9% of providers in intervention group 2 reduced their antibiotic and antipsychotic prescribing rate by ≥ 1 compared to the control group (77.6%) (p-value 0.0073). This reduction was maintained into 2018/19 at 91.4%. On multivariate regression alternatively funded providers had 2.4 × higher odds of reducing their antibiotic prescribing rate compared to fee-for-service providers. In quantile regression of providers with a reduction in antibiotic prescribing, alternatively funded (e.g. salaried or locum) providers compared to fee-for-service providers were significant at the 80(th) quantile. CONCLUSIONS: Both A&F and recommendation summaries sent to providers by a trusted source reduced unnecessary prescriptions. Our findings support further scale up of efforts to engage with primary care practices to improve care with A&F. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05385445, retrospectively registered, 23/05/2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01912-7. BioMed Central 2022-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9701433/ /pubmed/36435746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01912-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Singer, Alexander
Kosowan, Leanne
Abrams, Elissa M.
Katz, Alan
Lix, Lisa
Leong, Katrina
Paige, Allison
Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail
title Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail
title_full Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail
title_fullStr Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail
title_full_unstemmed Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail
title_short Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail
title_sort implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the choosing wisely canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36435746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01912-7
work_keys_str_mv AT singeralexander implementinganauditandfeedbackcycletoimproveadherencetothechoosingwiselycanadarecommendationsclusteredrandomizedtrail
AT kosowanleanne implementinganauditandfeedbackcycletoimproveadherencetothechoosingwiselycanadarecommendationsclusteredrandomizedtrail
AT abramselissam implementinganauditandfeedbackcycletoimproveadherencetothechoosingwiselycanadarecommendationsclusteredrandomizedtrail
AT katzalan implementinganauditandfeedbackcycletoimproveadherencetothechoosingwiselycanadarecommendationsclusteredrandomizedtrail
AT lixlisa implementinganauditandfeedbackcycletoimproveadherencetothechoosingwiselycanadarecommendationsclusteredrandomizedtrail
AT leongkatrina implementinganauditandfeedbackcycletoimproveadherencetothechoosingwiselycanadarecommendationsclusteredrandomizedtrail
AT paigeallison implementinganauditandfeedbackcycletoimproveadherencetothechoosingwiselycanadarecommendationsclusteredrandomizedtrail